Information Sources and Decision-Making in Neurosurgery: Results of a Survey of Members of the Brazilian Neurosurgery Society

Abstract Introduction In all surgical disciplines, including neurosurgery, there are questions about the level of evidence supporting surgical practices and the mechanisms and adequacy of knowledge translation. Objectives To assess the perception of Brazilian neurosurgeons...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rodrigo Gorayeb, Maria João Forjaz, Antônio Gonçalves-Ferreira, Joaquim Ferreira
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda. 2018-05-01
Series:Brazilian Neurosurgery
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0038-1656716
id doaj-752515bfcd3e4c339bb172abaf38ea43
record_format Article
spelling doaj-752515bfcd3e4c339bb172abaf38ea432021-04-02T12:08:43ZengThieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.Brazilian Neurosurgery0103-53552359-59222018-05-01370208108710.1055/s-0038-1656716Information Sources and Decision-Making in Neurosurgery: Results of a Survey of Members of the Brazilian Neurosurgery SocietyRodrigo Gorayeb0Maria João Forjaz1Antônio Gonçalves-Ferreira2Joaquim Ferreira3Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, PortugalNational School of Public Health, Institute of Health Carlos III and REDISSEC, Biscay, SpainClínica Universitária de Neurocirurgia e Instituto de Anatomia, Faculty of Medicine, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, PortugalInstituto de Medicina Molecular, Lisbon, Portugal; Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, Universidade of Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal; Campus Neurológico Sénior, Torres Vedras, Lisbon, PortugalAbstract Introduction In all surgical disciplines, including neurosurgery, there are questions about the level of evidence supporting surgical practices and the mechanisms and adequacy of knowledge translation. Objectives To assess the perception of Brazilian neurosurgeons of information sources and decision-making mechanisms related to their medical practices. Methods An online questionnaire was sent to the 2,400 members of the Brazilian Neurosurgical Society. Results A total of 32% of the neurosurgeons completed the questionnaire, 53% had more than 10 years experience, 67% had worked in public hospitals, 34% had performed spine surgeries, and 30% had performed brain tumor surgeries. The therapeutic decisions were based mostly on internship learning (54%) and personal professional experience (52%). The most common information sources were scientific abstracts (53%) and the Internet (47%). A total of 89% believed that evidence-based medicine was relevant, 93% believed protocols or guidelines were necessary, and 74% subscribed to a medical journal. Nonetheless, only 43% had protocols implemented in their services, 93% highly valued a surgeon's personal experience, and 63% showed little familiarity with the interpretation of scientific concepts in the literature. Among the respondents, 83% were willing to try an innovative treatment alternative if it was shown to improve clinical outcomes and reduce severe complications. Conclusions The disparity in the responses highlights the need to implement recommendations that improve decision-making mechanisms.http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0038-1656716neurosurgeryevidence-based medicinesource of informationdecision-making
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rodrigo Gorayeb
Maria João Forjaz
Antônio Gonçalves-Ferreira
Joaquim Ferreira
spellingShingle Rodrigo Gorayeb
Maria João Forjaz
Antônio Gonçalves-Ferreira
Joaquim Ferreira
Information Sources and Decision-Making in Neurosurgery: Results of a Survey of Members of the Brazilian Neurosurgery Society
Brazilian Neurosurgery
neurosurgery
evidence-based medicine
source of information
decision-making
author_facet Rodrigo Gorayeb
Maria João Forjaz
Antônio Gonçalves-Ferreira
Joaquim Ferreira
author_sort Rodrigo Gorayeb
title Information Sources and Decision-Making in Neurosurgery: Results of a Survey of Members of the Brazilian Neurosurgery Society
title_short Information Sources and Decision-Making in Neurosurgery: Results of a Survey of Members of the Brazilian Neurosurgery Society
title_full Information Sources and Decision-Making in Neurosurgery: Results of a Survey of Members of the Brazilian Neurosurgery Society
title_fullStr Information Sources and Decision-Making in Neurosurgery: Results of a Survey of Members of the Brazilian Neurosurgery Society
title_full_unstemmed Information Sources and Decision-Making in Neurosurgery: Results of a Survey of Members of the Brazilian Neurosurgery Society
title_sort information sources and decision-making in neurosurgery: results of a survey of members of the brazilian neurosurgery society
publisher Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
series Brazilian Neurosurgery
issn 0103-5355
2359-5922
publishDate 2018-05-01
description Abstract Introduction In all surgical disciplines, including neurosurgery, there are questions about the level of evidence supporting surgical practices and the mechanisms and adequacy of knowledge translation. Objectives To assess the perception of Brazilian neurosurgeons of information sources and decision-making mechanisms related to their medical practices. Methods An online questionnaire was sent to the 2,400 members of the Brazilian Neurosurgical Society. Results A total of 32% of the neurosurgeons completed the questionnaire, 53% had more than 10 years experience, 67% had worked in public hospitals, 34% had performed spine surgeries, and 30% had performed brain tumor surgeries. The therapeutic decisions were based mostly on internship learning (54%) and personal professional experience (52%). The most common information sources were scientific abstracts (53%) and the Internet (47%). A total of 89% believed that evidence-based medicine was relevant, 93% believed protocols or guidelines were necessary, and 74% subscribed to a medical journal. Nonetheless, only 43% had protocols implemented in their services, 93% highly valued a surgeon's personal experience, and 63% showed little familiarity with the interpretation of scientific concepts in the literature. Among the respondents, 83% were willing to try an innovative treatment alternative if it was shown to improve clinical outcomes and reduce severe complications. Conclusions The disparity in the responses highlights the need to implement recommendations that improve decision-making mechanisms.
topic neurosurgery
evidence-based medicine
source of information
decision-making
url http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0038-1656716
work_keys_str_mv AT rodrigogorayeb informationsourcesanddecisionmakinginneurosurgeryresultsofasurveyofmembersofthebrazilianneurosurgerysociety
AT mariajoaoforjaz informationsourcesanddecisionmakinginneurosurgeryresultsofasurveyofmembersofthebrazilianneurosurgerysociety
AT antoniogoncalvesferreira informationsourcesanddecisionmakinginneurosurgeryresultsofasurveyofmembersofthebrazilianneurosurgerysociety
AT joaquimferreira informationsourcesanddecisionmakinginneurosurgeryresultsofasurveyofmembersofthebrazilianneurosurgerysociety
_version_ 1721570053723258880