Characterizing the Human Mycobiota: A Comparison of Small Subunit rRNA, ITS1, ITS2, and Large Subunit rRNA Genomic Targets

Interest in the human microbiome has increased dramatically in the last decade. However, much of this research has focused on bacteria, while the composition and roles of their fungal counterparts remain less understood. Furthermore, a variety of methodological approaches have been applied, and the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michael Hoggard, Anna Vesty, Giselle Wong, Johanna M. Montgomery, Chantelle Fourie, Richard G. Douglas, Kristi Biswas, Michael W. Taylor
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-09-01
Series:Frontiers in Microbiology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02208/full
id doaj-7529cd9bd3cf49d0810db8c0b8e54d7e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7529cd9bd3cf49d0810db8c0b8e54d7e2020-11-24T21:16:15ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Microbiology1664-302X2018-09-01910.3389/fmicb.2018.02208406817Characterizing the Human Mycobiota: A Comparison of Small Subunit rRNA, ITS1, ITS2, and Large Subunit rRNA Genomic TargetsMichael Hoggard0Anna Vesty1Anna Vesty2Giselle Wong3Johanna M. Montgomery4Chantelle Fourie5Richard G. Douglas6Kristi Biswas7Michael W. Taylor8Michael W. Taylor9School of Biological Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New ZealandSchool of Medicine, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New ZealandMicrobiology Laboratory, LabPLUS, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New ZealandSchool of Biological Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New ZealandDepartment of Physiology, Centre for Brain Research, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New ZealandDepartment of Physiology, Centre for Brain Research, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New ZealandSchool of Medicine, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New ZealandSchool of Medicine, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New ZealandSchool of Biological Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New ZealandMaurice Wilkins Centre for Molecular Biodiscovery, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New ZealandInterest in the human microbiome has increased dramatically in the last decade. However, much of this research has focused on bacteria, while the composition and roles of their fungal counterparts remain less understood. Furthermore, a variety of methodological approaches have been applied, and the comparability between studies is unclear. This study compared four primer pairs targeting the small subunit (SSU) rRNA (18S), ITS1, ITS2, and large subunit (LSU) rRNA (26S) genomic regions for their ability to accurately characterize fungal communities typical of the human mycobiota. All four target regions of 21 individual fungal mock community taxa were capable of being amplified adequately and sequenced. Mixed mock community analyses revealed marked variability in the ability of each primer pair to accurately characterize a complex community. ITS target regions outperformed LSU and SSU. Of the ITS regions, ITS1 failed to generate sequences for Yarrowia lipolytica and all three Malassezia species when in a mixed community. These findings were further supported in studies of human sinonasal and mouse fecal samples. Based on these analyses, previous studies using ITS1, SSU, or LSU markers may omit key taxa that are identified by the ITS2 marker. Of methods commonly used in human mycobiota studies to date, we recommend selection of the ITS2 marker. Further investigation of more recently developed fungal primer options will be essential to ultimately determine the optimal methodological approach by which future human mycobiota studies ought to be standardized.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02208/fullfungihuman microbiomemicrobiotamycobiotainternal transcribed spacernext-generation sequencing
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Michael Hoggard
Anna Vesty
Anna Vesty
Giselle Wong
Johanna M. Montgomery
Chantelle Fourie
Richard G. Douglas
Kristi Biswas
Michael W. Taylor
Michael W. Taylor
spellingShingle Michael Hoggard
Anna Vesty
Anna Vesty
Giselle Wong
Johanna M. Montgomery
Chantelle Fourie
Richard G. Douglas
Kristi Biswas
Michael W. Taylor
Michael W. Taylor
Characterizing the Human Mycobiota: A Comparison of Small Subunit rRNA, ITS1, ITS2, and Large Subunit rRNA Genomic Targets
Frontiers in Microbiology
fungi
human microbiome
microbiota
mycobiota
internal transcribed spacer
next-generation sequencing
author_facet Michael Hoggard
Anna Vesty
Anna Vesty
Giselle Wong
Johanna M. Montgomery
Chantelle Fourie
Richard G. Douglas
Kristi Biswas
Michael W. Taylor
Michael W. Taylor
author_sort Michael Hoggard
title Characterizing the Human Mycobiota: A Comparison of Small Subunit rRNA, ITS1, ITS2, and Large Subunit rRNA Genomic Targets
title_short Characterizing the Human Mycobiota: A Comparison of Small Subunit rRNA, ITS1, ITS2, and Large Subunit rRNA Genomic Targets
title_full Characterizing the Human Mycobiota: A Comparison of Small Subunit rRNA, ITS1, ITS2, and Large Subunit rRNA Genomic Targets
title_fullStr Characterizing the Human Mycobiota: A Comparison of Small Subunit rRNA, ITS1, ITS2, and Large Subunit rRNA Genomic Targets
title_full_unstemmed Characterizing the Human Mycobiota: A Comparison of Small Subunit rRNA, ITS1, ITS2, and Large Subunit rRNA Genomic Targets
title_sort characterizing the human mycobiota: a comparison of small subunit rrna, its1, its2, and large subunit rrna genomic targets
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Microbiology
issn 1664-302X
publishDate 2018-09-01
description Interest in the human microbiome has increased dramatically in the last decade. However, much of this research has focused on bacteria, while the composition and roles of their fungal counterparts remain less understood. Furthermore, a variety of methodological approaches have been applied, and the comparability between studies is unclear. This study compared four primer pairs targeting the small subunit (SSU) rRNA (18S), ITS1, ITS2, and large subunit (LSU) rRNA (26S) genomic regions for their ability to accurately characterize fungal communities typical of the human mycobiota. All four target regions of 21 individual fungal mock community taxa were capable of being amplified adequately and sequenced. Mixed mock community analyses revealed marked variability in the ability of each primer pair to accurately characterize a complex community. ITS target regions outperformed LSU and SSU. Of the ITS regions, ITS1 failed to generate sequences for Yarrowia lipolytica and all three Malassezia species when in a mixed community. These findings were further supported in studies of human sinonasal and mouse fecal samples. Based on these analyses, previous studies using ITS1, SSU, or LSU markers may omit key taxa that are identified by the ITS2 marker. Of methods commonly used in human mycobiota studies to date, we recommend selection of the ITS2 marker. Further investigation of more recently developed fungal primer options will be essential to ultimately determine the optimal methodological approach by which future human mycobiota studies ought to be standardized.
topic fungi
human microbiome
microbiota
mycobiota
internal transcribed spacer
next-generation sequencing
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02208/full
work_keys_str_mv AT michaelhoggard characterizingthehumanmycobiotaacomparisonofsmallsubunitrrnaits1its2andlargesubunitrrnagenomictargets
AT annavesty characterizingthehumanmycobiotaacomparisonofsmallsubunitrrnaits1its2andlargesubunitrrnagenomictargets
AT annavesty characterizingthehumanmycobiotaacomparisonofsmallsubunitrrnaits1its2andlargesubunitrrnagenomictargets
AT gisellewong characterizingthehumanmycobiotaacomparisonofsmallsubunitrrnaits1its2andlargesubunitrrnagenomictargets
AT johannammontgomery characterizingthehumanmycobiotaacomparisonofsmallsubunitrrnaits1its2andlargesubunitrrnagenomictargets
AT chantellefourie characterizingthehumanmycobiotaacomparisonofsmallsubunitrrnaits1its2andlargesubunitrrnagenomictargets
AT richardgdouglas characterizingthehumanmycobiotaacomparisonofsmallsubunitrrnaits1its2andlargesubunitrrnagenomictargets
AT kristibiswas characterizingthehumanmycobiotaacomparisonofsmallsubunitrrnaits1its2andlargesubunitrrnagenomictargets
AT michaelwtaylor characterizingthehumanmycobiotaacomparisonofsmallsubunitrrnaits1its2andlargesubunitrrnagenomictargets
AT michaelwtaylor characterizingthehumanmycobiotaacomparisonofsmallsubunitrrnaits1its2andlargesubunitrrnagenomictargets
_version_ 1726016368196714496