A hard day’s night: time use in shift workers

Abstract Background Differences in how shift workers accumulate physical activity (PA) while at work and in leisure time, on days when they are working at night, during the day, or on non-work days, are largely unexplored. The aim of this study was to improve understanding of physical activity patte...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tracy L. Kolbe-Alexander, Sjaan Gomersall, Bronwyn Clark, Luciana Torquati, Toby Pavey, Wendy J. Brown
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-06-01
Series:BMC Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-019-6766-5
id doaj-752f7a4cb5b1492c8a52fc15f27ce721
record_format Article
spelling doaj-752f7a4cb5b1492c8a52fc15f27ce7212020-11-25T03:11:51ZengBMCBMC Public Health1471-24582019-06-0119S211110.1186/s12889-019-6766-5A hard day’s night: time use in shift workersTracy L. Kolbe-Alexander0Sjaan Gomersall1Bronwyn Clark2Luciana Torquati3Toby Pavey4Wendy J. Brown5School of Health and Wellbeing, University of Southern QueenslandSchool of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of QueenslandSchool of Public Health, The University of QueenslandSchool of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of QueenslandSchool of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of QueenslandSchool of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of QueenslandAbstract Background Differences in how shift workers accumulate physical activity (PA) while at work and in leisure time, on days when they are working at night, during the day, or on non-work days, are largely unexplored. The aim of this study was to improve understanding of physical activity patterns in two groups of shift workers, and to measure variations according to their shift schedules. Methods This pragmatic pilot study was conducted in two workplaces. Employees in Workplace 1 (n = 10) were required to drive for most of their shift. Workplace 2 was a manufacturing company where most of the employees’ (n = 30) occupational tasks were completed while standing. Use of time was assessed using the adult version of the Multimedia Activity Recall for Children and Adults (MARCA) administered by telephone interview. Three MARCA interviews were conducted with each participant, in order to capture a typical profile of a day-shift day, a night-shift day and a non-work day, using a two-day recall for each interview. Participants were asked to wear the activPAL3™ activity monitor, for 7 consecutive days. Paired and independent t-tests were used to compute significant differences between day-shift, night-shift and non-work days within and between workplaces. Results The total number of days quantified for the MARCA data was 192 days (64 day-shift, 60 night-shift and 68 non-work days). Workplace 2 participants reported more physical activity and less sedentary behaviour on day-shift and night shift days than on non-work days. Time spent in sedentary behaviour was similar on day-shift, night-shift and non-work days in Workplace 1. Workplace 1 participants were more sedentary (p = 0.003) and engaged in more light intensity PA (p = 0.031) on day-shift and night-shift workdays, than those from Workplace 2. Sleep times were lowest on day-shift days. Conclusion As the occupational tasks for participants in Workplace 2 involved physical activities, the findings do not support the conventional view that shift workers are more sedentary than those who only work during the day. Rather occupational tasks appear to be a more important determinant of physical activity patterns both on work and non-work days than varying shift patterns.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-019-6766-5Shift workersTime-usePhysical activity
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tracy L. Kolbe-Alexander
Sjaan Gomersall
Bronwyn Clark
Luciana Torquati
Toby Pavey
Wendy J. Brown
spellingShingle Tracy L. Kolbe-Alexander
Sjaan Gomersall
Bronwyn Clark
Luciana Torquati
Toby Pavey
Wendy J. Brown
A hard day’s night: time use in shift workers
BMC Public Health
Shift workers
Time-use
Physical activity
author_facet Tracy L. Kolbe-Alexander
Sjaan Gomersall
Bronwyn Clark
Luciana Torquati
Toby Pavey
Wendy J. Brown
author_sort Tracy L. Kolbe-Alexander
title A hard day’s night: time use in shift workers
title_short A hard day’s night: time use in shift workers
title_full A hard day’s night: time use in shift workers
title_fullStr A hard day’s night: time use in shift workers
title_full_unstemmed A hard day’s night: time use in shift workers
title_sort hard day’s night: time use in shift workers
publisher BMC
series BMC Public Health
issn 1471-2458
publishDate 2019-06-01
description Abstract Background Differences in how shift workers accumulate physical activity (PA) while at work and in leisure time, on days when they are working at night, during the day, or on non-work days, are largely unexplored. The aim of this study was to improve understanding of physical activity patterns in two groups of shift workers, and to measure variations according to their shift schedules. Methods This pragmatic pilot study was conducted in two workplaces. Employees in Workplace 1 (n = 10) were required to drive for most of their shift. Workplace 2 was a manufacturing company where most of the employees’ (n = 30) occupational tasks were completed while standing. Use of time was assessed using the adult version of the Multimedia Activity Recall for Children and Adults (MARCA) administered by telephone interview. Three MARCA interviews were conducted with each participant, in order to capture a typical profile of a day-shift day, a night-shift day and a non-work day, using a two-day recall for each interview. Participants were asked to wear the activPAL3™ activity monitor, for 7 consecutive days. Paired and independent t-tests were used to compute significant differences between day-shift, night-shift and non-work days within and between workplaces. Results The total number of days quantified for the MARCA data was 192 days (64 day-shift, 60 night-shift and 68 non-work days). Workplace 2 participants reported more physical activity and less sedentary behaviour on day-shift and night shift days than on non-work days. Time spent in sedentary behaviour was similar on day-shift, night-shift and non-work days in Workplace 1. Workplace 1 participants were more sedentary (p = 0.003) and engaged in more light intensity PA (p = 0.031) on day-shift and night-shift workdays, than those from Workplace 2. Sleep times were lowest on day-shift days. Conclusion As the occupational tasks for participants in Workplace 2 involved physical activities, the findings do not support the conventional view that shift workers are more sedentary than those who only work during the day. Rather occupational tasks appear to be a more important determinant of physical activity patterns both on work and non-work days than varying shift patterns.
topic Shift workers
Time-use
Physical activity
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-019-6766-5
work_keys_str_mv AT tracylkolbealexander aharddaysnighttimeuseinshiftworkers
AT sjaangomersall aharddaysnighttimeuseinshiftworkers
AT bronwynclark aharddaysnighttimeuseinshiftworkers
AT lucianatorquati aharddaysnighttimeuseinshiftworkers
AT tobypavey aharddaysnighttimeuseinshiftworkers
AT wendyjbrown aharddaysnighttimeuseinshiftworkers
AT tracylkolbealexander harddaysnighttimeuseinshiftworkers
AT sjaangomersall harddaysnighttimeuseinshiftworkers
AT bronwynclark harddaysnighttimeuseinshiftworkers
AT lucianatorquati harddaysnighttimeuseinshiftworkers
AT tobypavey harddaysnighttimeuseinshiftworkers
AT wendyjbrown harddaysnighttimeuseinshiftworkers
_version_ 1724652636821520384