Comparison of Diagnostic Tools for the Detection of <i>Dirofilaria immitis </i>Infection in Dogs

• Main Authors: Rossella Panarese, Roberta Iatta, Jairo Alfonso Mendoza-Roldan, Donald Szlosek, Jennifer Braff, Joe Liu, Frédéric Beugnet, Filipe Dantas-Torres, Melissa J. Beall, Domenico Otranto
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: MDPI AG 2020-06-01
• Series: Pathogens
• Subjects: <b><i>Keywords:</i></b> <i>Dirofilaria immitis</i>; modified Knott’s test; ELISA; immune complex dissociation; serological assays
• Online Access: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0817/9/6/499

In the last two decades, reports of canine heartworm (HW) infection have increased even in non-endemic areas, with a large variability in prevalence data due to the diagnostic strategy employed. This study evaluated the relative performance of two microtiter plate ELISA methods for the detection of HW antigen in determining the occurrence of <i>Dirofilaria immitis </i>in a dog population previously tested by the modified Knott’s test and SNAP 4Dx Plus test. The prevalence of this infection in the sheltered dog population (n = 363) from a high-risk area for HW infection was 44.4% according to the modified Knott’s test and 58.1% according to a point-of-care antigen ELISA. All serum samples were then evaluated by a microtiter plate ELISA test performed with and without immune complex dissociation (ICD). The prevalence increased from 56.5% to 79.6% following ICD, indicating a high proportion of samples with immune complexing. Comparing these results to that of the modified Knott’s test, the samples negative for microfilariae (mfs) and those positive only for <i>D. repens</i> mfs demonstrated the greatest increase in the proportion of positive results for <i>D. immitis</i> by ELISA following ICD. While the ICD method is not recommended for routine screening, it may be a valuable secondary strategy for identifying HW infections in dogs.