Models Explaining the Levels of Forest Environmental Taxes and Other PES Schemes in Japan

Between 2003 and April 2016, 37 of 47 prefectures (i.e., sub-national local governmental units) introduced forest environmental taxes—local payment for environmental services (PES) schemes. These introductions are unique historical natural experiments, in which local governments made their own polit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Takuya Takahashi, Katsuya Tanaka
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-05-01
Series:Forests
Subjects:
PES
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/12/6/685
id doaj-7597a132c9cf4263950831a887042461
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7597a132c9cf4263950831a8870424612021-06-01T01:18:13ZengMDPI AGForests1999-49072021-05-011268568510.3390/f12060685Models Explaining the Levels of Forest Environmental Taxes and Other PES Schemes in JapanTakuya Takahashi0Katsuya Tanaka1School of Environmental Science, University of Shiga Prefecture, Shiga 522-8533, JapanFaculty of Economics and Research Center for Sustainability and Environment, Shiga University, Hikone, Shiga 522-8522, JapanBetween 2003 and April 2016, 37 of 47 prefectures (i.e., sub-national local governmental units) introduced forest environmental taxes—local payment for environmental services (PES) schemes. These introductions are unique historical natural experiments, in which local governments made their own political decisions considering multiple factors. This study empirically evaluates models that explain normalized expenditures from forest environmental taxes as well as other PES schemes (subsidies for enhancing forests’ and mountain villages’ multifunction, and green donation) and traditional forestry budgets for Japan’s 47 prefectures based on the median voter model. Results demonstrate that the median voter model can particularly explain forest environmental taxes and forestry budgets. Specifically, the past incidence of droughts and landslides is positively correlated with the levels of forest environmental taxes. The higher the number of municipalities in a prefecture, the lower the amount of forest environmental tax spent on forests. Moreover, the number of forest volunteering groups, possibly an indicator of social capital in the forest sectors, had strong positive correlations with the levels of forest environmental taxes and forestry budgets. Other PES schemes and forestry budgets had unique patterns of correlations with the examined factors.https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/12/6/685PESpoliticslocal governmentspublic finance
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Takuya Takahashi
Katsuya Tanaka
spellingShingle Takuya Takahashi
Katsuya Tanaka
Models Explaining the Levels of Forest Environmental Taxes and Other PES Schemes in Japan
Forests
PES
politics
local governments
public finance
author_facet Takuya Takahashi
Katsuya Tanaka
author_sort Takuya Takahashi
title Models Explaining the Levels of Forest Environmental Taxes and Other PES Schemes in Japan
title_short Models Explaining the Levels of Forest Environmental Taxes and Other PES Schemes in Japan
title_full Models Explaining the Levels of Forest Environmental Taxes and Other PES Schemes in Japan
title_fullStr Models Explaining the Levels of Forest Environmental Taxes and Other PES Schemes in Japan
title_full_unstemmed Models Explaining the Levels of Forest Environmental Taxes and Other PES Schemes in Japan
title_sort models explaining the levels of forest environmental taxes and other pes schemes in japan
publisher MDPI AG
series Forests
issn 1999-4907
publishDate 2021-05-01
description Between 2003 and April 2016, 37 of 47 prefectures (i.e., sub-national local governmental units) introduced forest environmental taxes—local payment for environmental services (PES) schemes. These introductions are unique historical natural experiments, in which local governments made their own political decisions considering multiple factors. This study empirically evaluates models that explain normalized expenditures from forest environmental taxes as well as other PES schemes (subsidies for enhancing forests’ and mountain villages’ multifunction, and green donation) and traditional forestry budgets for Japan’s 47 prefectures based on the median voter model. Results demonstrate that the median voter model can particularly explain forest environmental taxes and forestry budgets. Specifically, the past incidence of droughts and landslides is positively correlated with the levels of forest environmental taxes. The higher the number of municipalities in a prefecture, the lower the amount of forest environmental tax spent on forests. Moreover, the number of forest volunteering groups, possibly an indicator of social capital in the forest sectors, had strong positive correlations with the levels of forest environmental taxes and forestry budgets. Other PES schemes and forestry budgets had unique patterns of correlations with the examined factors.
topic PES
politics
local governments
public finance
url https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/12/6/685
work_keys_str_mv AT takuyatakahashi modelsexplainingthelevelsofforestenvironmentaltaxesandotherpesschemesinjapan
AT katsuyatanaka modelsexplainingthelevelsofforestenvironmentaltaxesandotherpesschemesinjapan
_version_ 1721412658379358208