A computer evaluation of the dentin remaining after cervical preparation in curved canals: gates-glidden drills vs. orifice shaper

The aim of this study was to evaluate the preparation of the cervical two thirds of curved canals after using two different endodontic rotary instruments, i.e., Gates-Glidden drills and Orifice Shaper. 20 mesial roots of mandibular molars were used and analyzed before and after instrumentation. The...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tauby Coutinho Filho, Gustavo André De Deus Carneiro Vianna, Tatiana Guimarães Pinto, Eduardo Diogo Gurgel Filho, Cláudio Maniglia Ferreira
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidade Estadual de Campinas 2015-10-01
Series:Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8641105
id doaj-75e23f5ec545446fb5de6c72411558c2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-75e23f5ec545446fb5de6c72411558c22021-07-15T14:03:09ZengUniversidade Estadual de CampinasBrazilian Journal of Oral Sciences1677-32252015-10-011310.20396/bjos.v1i3.8641105A computer evaluation of the dentin remaining after cervical preparation in curved canals: gates-glidden drills vs. orifice shaperTauby Coutinho Filho0Gustavo André De Deus Carneiro Vianna1Tatiana Guimarães Pinto2Eduardo Diogo Gurgel Filho3Cláudio Maniglia Ferreira4Rio de Janeiro State UniversityRio de Janeiro State UniversityRio de Janeiro State UniversityUNIFORUNIFORThe aim of this study was to evaluate the preparation of the cervical two thirds of curved canals after using two different endodontic rotary instruments, i.e., Gates-Glidden drills and Orifice Shaper. 20 mesial roots of mandibular molars were used and analyzed before and after instrumentation. The teeth were then placed in clear resin blocks and thus it was possible to remove the resin blocks from the mold, cut them 3 mm below the root bifurcation, and analyze the teeth. The blocks were then reassembled in the mold so that the canals could be instrumented. The area of the mesial canal and the least radicular thickness between furcation and mesial root were measured using an image analyzer computer program. The amount of dental tissue removed by the two instruments was greater towards the furcation. The mean area of the canals prepared with the GG drill was 0.63mm2 and the mean area of the canals prepared with the OS was 0.47mm2 . The average thickness between the mesiobuccal canal prepared by the GG drill and the furcation was 0.72mm and the average thickness between the mesiolingual canal instrumented by the OS and the furcation was 0.81mm. The remaining radicular thickness between the distal wall of the mesial root and the lumen of the canals prepared with either the Gates-Glidden drills or the Orifice Shaper was not significant (P>0.05).https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8641105Cleaning and shapingGates-glidden drillOrifice shaperRoot canal
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tauby Coutinho Filho
Gustavo André De Deus Carneiro Vianna
Tatiana Guimarães Pinto
Eduardo Diogo Gurgel Filho
Cláudio Maniglia Ferreira
spellingShingle Tauby Coutinho Filho
Gustavo André De Deus Carneiro Vianna
Tatiana Guimarães Pinto
Eduardo Diogo Gurgel Filho
Cláudio Maniglia Ferreira
A computer evaluation of the dentin remaining after cervical preparation in curved canals: gates-glidden drills vs. orifice shaper
Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences
Cleaning and shaping
Gates-glidden drill
Orifice shaper
Root canal
author_facet Tauby Coutinho Filho
Gustavo André De Deus Carneiro Vianna
Tatiana Guimarães Pinto
Eduardo Diogo Gurgel Filho
Cláudio Maniglia Ferreira
author_sort Tauby Coutinho Filho
title A computer evaluation of the dentin remaining after cervical preparation in curved canals: gates-glidden drills vs. orifice shaper
title_short A computer evaluation of the dentin remaining after cervical preparation in curved canals: gates-glidden drills vs. orifice shaper
title_full A computer evaluation of the dentin remaining after cervical preparation in curved canals: gates-glidden drills vs. orifice shaper
title_fullStr A computer evaluation of the dentin remaining after cervical preparation in curved canals: gates-glidden drills vs. orifice shaper
title_full_unstemmed A computer evaluation of the dentin remaining after cervical preparation in curved canals: gates-glidden drills vs. orifice shaper
title_sort computer evaluation of the dentin remaining after cervical preparation in curved canals: gates-glidden drills vs. orifice shaper
publisher Universidade Estadual de Campinas
series Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences
issn 1677-3225
publishDate 2015-10-01
description The aim of this study was to evaluate the preparation of the cervical two thirds of curved canals after using two different endodontic rotary instruments, i.e., Gates-Glidden drills and Orifice Shaper. 20 mesial roots of mandibular molars were used and analyzed before and after instrumentation. The teeth were then placed in clear resin blocks and thus it was possible to remove the resin blocks from the mold, cut them 3 mm below the root bifurcation, and analyze the teeth. The blocks were then reassembled in the mold so that the canals could be instrumented. The area of the mesial canal and the least radicular thickness between furcation and mesial root were measured using an image analyzer computer program. The amount of dental tissue removed by the two instruments was greater towards the furcation. The mean area of the canals prepared with the GG drill was 0.63mm2 and the mean area of the canals prepared with the OS was 0.47mm2 . The average thickness between the mesiobuccal canal prepared by the GG drill and the furcation was 0.72mm and the average thickness between the mesiolingual canal instrumented by the OS and the furcation was 0.81mm. The remaining radicular thickness between the distal wall of the mesial root and the lumen of the canals prepared with either the Gates-Glidden drills or the Orifice Shaper was not significant (P>0.05).
topic Cleaning and shaping
Gates-glidden drill
Orifice shaper
Root canal
url https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8641105
work_keys_str_mv AT taubycoutinhofilho acomputerevaluationofthedentinremainingaftercervicalpreparationincurvedcanalsgatesgliddendrillsvsorificeshaper
AT gustavoandrededeuscarneirovianna acomputerevaluationofthedentinremainingaftercervicalpreparationincurvedcanalsgatesgliddendrillsvsorificeshaper
AT tatianaguimaraespinto acomputerevaluationofthedentinremainingaftercervicalpreparationincurvedcanalsgatesgliddendrillsvsorificeshaper
AT eduardodiogogurgelfilho acomputerevaluationofthedentinremainingaftercervicalpreparationincurvedcanalsgatesgliddendrillsvsorificeshaper
AT claudiomanigliaferreira acomputerevaluationofthedentinremainingaftercervicalpreparationincurvedcanalsgatesgliddendrillsvsorificeshaper
AT taubycoutinhofilho computerevaluationofthedentinremainingaftercervicalpreparationincurvedcanalsgatesgliddendrillsvsorificeshaper
AT gustavoandrededeuscarneirovianna computerevaluationofthedentinremainingaftercervicalpreparationincurvedcanalsgatesgliddendrillsvsorificeshaper
AT tatianaguimaraespinto computerevaluationofthedentinremainingaftercervicalpreparationincurvedcanalsgatesgliddendrillsvsorificeshaper
AT eduardodiogogurgelfilho computerevaluationofthedentinremainingaftercervicalpreparationincurvedcanalsgatesgliddendrillsvsorificeshaper
AT claudiomanigliaferreira computerevaluationofthedentinremainingaftercervicalpreparationincurvedcanalsgatesgliddendrillsvsorificeshaper
_version_ 1721300335994077184