Biopolitics, biotechnologies, biomedicine, and biolaw as forms of bioregulation

Modern science, education, and medicine are increasingly becoming the primary agents of biopolitics. Biomedicine is emerging, and before our eyes, it is becoming a part of the social sphere and, in the long term, a part of the new economic order and one of the state’s main agents of biopolitics. In...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mokhov Aleksandr Anatolyevich, Levushkin Anatolii Nikolaevich, Yavorskiy Aleksander Nikolaevich
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2021-01-01
Series:SHS Web of Conferences
Subjects:
law
Online Access:https://www.shs-conferences.org/articles/shsconf/pdf/2021/19/shsconf_blf2021_01009.pdf
id doaj-75fe306c2fe54afaaa51075e3ee2a54b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-75fe306c2fe54afaaa51075e3ee2a54b2021-06-11T07:55:30ZengEDP SciencesSHS Web of Conferences2261-24242021-01-011080100910.1051/shsconf/202110801009shsconf_blf2021_01009Biopolitics, biotechnologies, biomedicine, and biolaw as forms of bioregulationMokhov Aleksandr Anatolyevich0Levushkin Anatolii Nikolaevich1Yavorskiy Aleksander Nikolaevich2Kutafin Moscow State Law University, Department of medical LawKutafin Moscow State Law University, Department of Business and Corporate LawPushchino State Institute of Natural SciencesModern science, education, and medicine are increasingly becoming the primary agents of biopolitics. Biomedicine is emerging, and before our eyes, it is becoming a part of the social sphere and, in the long term, a part of the new economic order and one of the state’s main agents of biopolitics. In this regard, attention to ethical and legal issues in biomedicine will only increase in the coming years. The study’s objective was to determine the role and legal nature of biotechnologies, biopolitics, biomedicine, bioethics, and biolaw as forms of bioregulation. The methodological basis of this work was provided by general scientific methods of cognition of legal phenomena, such as synthesis, the method of analogy, formal logic, and others, as well as private, scientific methods of research of biotechnology, biopolitics, biomedicine, bioethics, and biolaw as forms of bioregulation. The issue is considered from the perspective of the concept of four “BIOs”: biotechnology-biosafety-bioeconomics-biopolitics. It is concluded that the role of not only bioethics but also the emerging biolaw in the implementation of biopolitics, i.e., policies aimed at the development of the economy, social sphere, and society, taking into account the new realities formed under the onslaught of modern biological technologies, is significantly increasing. Progress in biology and medicine led to the need to combine scientific and theoretical, and socio-cultural knowledge to solve society’s problems, bioethics began to take shape. The authors propose the accelerated development of biolaw as a supra-sectoral legal formation, allowing from the perspective of a systematic approach to combining the achievements of both established sectoral legal sciences (administrative law, civil law, etc.) and medical law, pharmaceutical law to solve new problems, leveling of biological threats, risks, ensuring biological safety. The development of biolaw cannot be done without the interdisciplinary approach provided by links with bioethics, biology, medicine, economics, public health, healthcare, and others.https://www.shs-conferences.org/articles/shsconf/pdf/2021/19/shsconf_blf2021_01009.pdfbiotechnologiesbioeconomicsbiopoliticslawbiomedicineregulation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mokhov Aleksandr Anatolyevich
Levushkin Anatolii Nikolaevich
Yavorskiy Aleksander Nikolaevich
spellingShingle Mokhov Aleksandr Anatolyevich
Levushkin Anatolii Nikolaevich
Yavorskiy Aleksander Nikolaevich
Biopolitics, biotechnologies, biomedicine, and biolaw as forms of bioregulation
SHS Web of Conferences
biotechnologies
bioeconomics
biopolitics
law
biomedicine
regulation
author_facet Mokhov Aleksandr Anatolyevich
Levushkin Anatolii Nikolaevich
Yavorskiy Aleksander Nikolaevich
author_sort Mokhov Aleksandr Anatolyevich
title Biopolitics, biotechnologies, biomedicine, and biolaw as forms of bioregulation
title_short Biopolitics, biotechnologies, biomedicine, and biolaw as forms of bioregulation
title_full Biopolitics, biotechnologies, biomedicine, and biolaw as forms of bioregulation
title_fullStr Biopolitics, biotechnologies, biomedicine, and biolaw as forms of bioregulation
title_full_unstemmed Biopolitics, biotechnologies, biomedicine, and biolaw as forms of bioregulation
title_sort biopolitics, biotechnologies, biomedicine, and biolaw as forms of bioregulation
publisher EDP Sciences
series SHS Web of Conferences
issn 2261-2424
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Modern science, education, and medicine are increasingly becoming the primary agents of biopolitics. Biomedicine is emerging, and before our eyes, it is becoming a part of the social sphere and, in the long term, a part of the new economic order and one of the state’s main agents of biopolitics. In this regard, attention to ethical and legal issues in biomedicine will only increase in the coming years. The study’s objective was to determine the role and legal nature of biotechnologies, biopolitics, biomedicine, bioethics, and biolaw as forms of bioregulation. The methodological basis of this work was provided by general scientific methods of cognition of legal phenomena, such as synthesis, the method of analogy, formal logic, and others, as well as private, scientific methods of research of biotechnology, biopolitics, biomedicine, bioethics, and biolaw as forms of bioregulation. The issue is considered from the perspective of the concept of four “BIOs”: biotechnology-biosafety-bioeconomics-biopolitics. It is concluded that the role of not only bioethics but also the emerging biolaw in the implementation of biopolitics, i.e., policies aimed at the development of the economy, social sphere, and society, taking into account the new realities formed under the onslaught of modern biological technologies, is significantly increasing. Progress in biology and medicine led to the need to combine scientific and theoretical, and socio-cultural knowledge to solve society’s problems, bioethics began to take shape. The authors propose the accelerated development of biolaw as a supra-sectoral legal formation, allowing from the perspective of a systematic approach to combining the achievements of both established sectoral legal sciences (administrative law, civil law, etc.) and medical law, pharmaceutical law to solve new problems, leveling of biological threats, risks, ensuring biological safety. The development of biolaw cannot be done without the interdisciplinary approach provided by links with bioethics, biology, medicine, economics, public health, healthcare, and others.
topic biotechnologies
bioeconomics
biopolitics
law
biomedicine
regulation
url https://www.shs-conferences.org/articles/shsconf/pdf/2021/19/shsconf_blf2021_01009.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT mokhovaleksandranatolyevich biopoliticsbiotechnologiesbiomedicineandbiolawasformsofbioregulation
AT levushkinanatoliinikolaevich biopoliticsbiotechnologiesbiomedicineandbiolawasformsofbioregulation
AT yavorskiyaleksandernikolaevich biopoliticsbiotechnologiesbiomedicineandbiolawasformsofbioregulation
_version_ 1721382785800732672