Transposable Elements and Genome Size Variations in Plants

Although the number of protein-coding genes is not highly variable between plant taxa, the DNA content in their genomes is highly variable, by as much as 2,056-fold from a 1C amount of 0.0648 pg to 132.5 pg. The mean 1C-value in plants is 2.4 pg, and genome size expansion/contraction is lineage-spec...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sung-Il Lee, Nam-Soo Kim
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Korea Genome Organization 2014-09-01
Series:Genomics & Informatics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://genominfo.org/upload/pdf/gni-12-87.pdf
id doaj-7607ed3bf3e640e281d89ac7483d060c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7607ed3bf3e640e281d89ac7483d060c2020-11-25T00:26:26ZengKorea Genome OrganizationGenomics & Informatics1598-866X2234-07422014-09-01123879710.5808/GI.2014.12.3.87133Transposable Elements and Genome Size Variations in PlantsSung-Il Lee0Nam-Soo Kim1Department of Molecular Bioscience, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 200-701, Korea.Department of Molecular Bioscience, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 200-701, Korea.Although the number of protein-coding genes is not highly variable between plant taxa, the DNA content in their genomes is highly variable, by as much as 2,056-fold from a 1C amount of 0.0648 pg to 132.5 pg. The mean 1C-value in plants is 2.4 pg, and genome size expansion/contraction is lineage-specific in plant taxonomy. Transposable element fractions in plant genomes are also variable, as low as ~3% in small genomes and as high as ~85% in large genomes, indicating that genome size is a linear function of transposable element content. Of the 2 classes of transposable elements, the dynamics of class 1 long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons is a major contributor to the 1C value differences among plants. The activity of LTR retrotransposons is under the control of epigenetic suppressing mechanisms. Also, genome-purging mechanisms have been adopted to counter-balance the genome size amplification. With a wealth of information on whole-genome sequences in plant genomes, it was revealed that several genome-purging mechanisms have been employed, depending on plant taxa. Two genera, Lilium and Fritillaria, are known to have large genomes in angiosperms. There were twice times of concerted genome size evolutions in the family Liliaceae during the divergence of the current genera in Liliaceae. In addition to the LTR retrotransposons, non-LTR retrotransposons and satellite DNAs contributed to the huge genomes in the two genera by possible failure of genome counter-balancing mechanisms.http://genominfo.org/upload/pdf/gni-12-87.pdfC-valueDNA transposable elementsgenome-purginggenome sizeLTR retrotransposons
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sung-Il Lee
Nam-Soo Kim
spellingShingle Sung-Il Lee
Nam-Soo Kim
Transposable Elements and Genome Size Variations in Plants
Genomics & Informatics
C-value
DNA transposable elements
genome-purging
genome size
LTR retrotransposons
author_facet Sung-Il Lee
Nam-Soo Kim
author_sort Sung-Il Lee
title Transposable Elements and Genome Size Variations in Plants
title_short Transposable Elements and Genome Size Variations in Plants
title_full Transposable Elements and Genome Size Variations in Plants
title_fullStr Transposable Elements and Genome Size Variations in Plants
title_full_unstemmed Transposable Elements and Genome Size Variations in Plants
title_sort transposable elements and genome size variations in plants
publisher Korea Genome Organization
series Genomics & Informatics
issn 1598-866X
2234-0742
publishDate 2014-09-01
description Although the number of protein-coding genes is not highly variable between plant taxa, the DNA content in their genomes is highly variable, by as much as 2,056-fold from a 1C amount of 0.0648 pg to 132.5 pg. The mean 1C-value in plants is 2.4 pg, and genome size expansion/contraction is lineage-specific in plant taxonomy. Transposable element fractions in plant genomes are also variable, as low as ~3% in small genomes and as high as ~85% in large genomes, indicating that genome size is a linear function of transposable element content. Of the 2 classes of transposable elements, the dynamics of class 1 long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons is a major contributor to the 1C value differences among plants. The activity of LTR retrotransposons is under the control of epigenetic suppressing mechanisms. Also, genome-purging mechanisms have been adopted to counter-balance the genome size amplification. With a wealth of information on whole-genome sequences in plant genomes, it was revealed that several genome-purging mechanisms have been employed, depending on plant taxa. Two genera, Lilium and Fritillaria, are known to have large genomes in angiosperms. There were twice times of concerted genome size evolutions in the family Liliaceae during the divergence of the current genera in Liliaceae. In addition to the LTR retrotransposons, non-LTR retrotransposons and satellite DNAs contributed to the huge genomes in the two genera by possible failure of genome counter-balancing mechanisms.
topic C-value
DNA transposable elements
genome-purging
genome size
LTR retrotransposons
url http://genominfo.org/upload/pdf/gni-12-87.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT sungillee transposableelementsandgenomesizevariationsinplants
AT namsookim transposableelementsandgenomesizevariationsinplants
_version_ 1725344053968502784