Effect of rock uplift and Milankovitch timescale variations in precipitation and vegetation cover on catchment erosion rates

<p>Catchment erosion and sedimentation are influenced by variations in the rates of rock uplift (tectonics) and periodic fluctuations in climate and vegetation cover. This study focuses on quantifying the effects of changing climate and vegetation on erosion and sedimentation over distinct cli...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: H. Sharma, T. A. Ehlers, C. Glotzbach, M. Schmid, K. Tielbörger
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2021-08-01
Series:Earth Surface Dynamics
Online Access:https://esurf.copernicus.org/articles/9/1045/2021/esurf-9-1045-2021.pdf
id doaj-7613ffb3d8974321a9f090bc2ab46289
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7613ffb3d8974321a9f090bc2ab462892021-08-26T14:02:09ZengCopernicus PublicationsEarth Surface Dynamics2196-63112196-632X2021-08-0191045107210.5194/esurf-9-1045-2021Effect of rock uplift and Milankovitch timescale variations in precipitation and vegetation cover on catchment erosion ratesH. Sharma0T. A. Ehlers1C. Glotzbach2M. Schmid3K. Tielbörger4Department of Geosciences, University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, GermanyDepartment of Geosciences, University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, GermanyDepartment of Geosciences, University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, GermanyDepartment of Geosciences, University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, GermanyDepartment of Biology, Plant Ecology Group, University of Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 5, 72076 Tübingen, Germany<p>Catchment erosion and sedimentation are influenced by variations in the rates of rock uplift (tectonics) and periodic fluctuations in climate and vegetation cover. This study focuses on quantifying the effects of changing climate and vegetation on erosion and sedimentation over distinct climate–vegetation settings by applying the Landlab–SPACE landscape evolution model. As catchment evolution is subjected to tectonic and climate forcings at millennial to million-year timescales, the simulations are performed for different tectonic scenarios and periodicities in climate–vegetation change. We present a series of generalized experiments that explore the sensitivity of catchment hillslope and fluvial erosion as well as sedimentation for different rock uplift rates (0.05, 0.1, 0.2 mm a<span class="inline-formula"><sup>−1</sup></span>) and Milankovitch climate periodicities (23, 41, and 100 kyr). Model inputs were parameterized for two different climate and vegetation conditions at two sites in the Chilean Coastal Cordillera at <span class="inline-formula">∼26</span><span class="inline-formula"><sup>∘</sup></span> S (arid and sparsely vegetated) and <span class="inline-formula">∼33</span><span class="inline-formula"><sup>∘</sup></span> S (Mediterranean). For each setting, steady-state topographies were produced for each uplift rate before introducing periodic variations in precipitation and vegetation cover. Following this, the sensitivity of these landscapes was analyzed for 3 Myr in a transient state. Results suggest that regardless of the uplift rate, transients in precipitation and vegetation cover resulted in transients in erosion rates in the direction of change in precipitation and vegetation. The transients in sedimentation were observed to be in the opposite direction of change in the precipitation and vegetation cover, with phase lags of <span class="inline-formula">∼1.5</span>–2.5 kyr. These phase lags can be attributed to the changes in plant functional type (PFT) distribution induced by the changes in climate and the regolith production rate. These effects are most pronounced over longer-period changes (100 kyr) and higher rock uplift rates (0.2 mm yr<span class="inline-formula"><sup>−1</sup></span>). This holds true for both the vegetation and climate settings considered. Furthermore, transient changes in catchment erosion due to varying vegetation and precipitation were between <span class="inline-formula">∼35</span> % and 110 % of the background (rock uplift) rate and would be measurable with commonly used techniques (e.g., sediment flux histories, cosmogenic nuclides). Taken together, we find that vegetation-dependent erosion and sedimentation are influenced by Milankovitch timescale changes in climate but that these transient changes are superimposed upon tectonically driven rates of rock uplift.</p>https://esurf.copernicus.org/articles/9/1045/2021/esurf-9-1045-2021.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author H. Sharma
T. A. Ehlers
C. Glotzbach
M. Schmid
K. Tielbörger
spellingShingle H. Sharma
T. A. Ehlers
C. Glotzbach
M. Schmid
K. Tielbörger
Effect of rock uplift and Milankovitch timescale variations in precipitation and vegetation cover on catchment erosion rates
Earth Surface Dynamics
author_facet H. Sharma
T. A. Ehlers
C. Glotzbach
M. Schmid
K. Tielbörger
author_sort H. Sharma
title Effect of rock uplift and Milankovitch timescale variations in precipitation and vegetation cover on catchment erosion rates
title_short Effect of rock uplift and Milankovitch timescale variations in precipitation and vegetation cover on catchment erosion rates
title_full Effect of rock uplift and Milankovitch timescale variations in precipitation and vegetation cover on catchment erosion rates
title_fullStr Effect of rock uplift and Milankovitch timescale variations in precipitation and vegetation cover on catchment erosion rates
title_full_unstemmed Effect of rock uplift and Milankovitch timescale variations in precipitation and vegetation cover on catchment erosion rates
title_sort effect of rock uplift and milankovitch timescale variations in precipitation and vegetation cover on catchment erosion rates
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Earth Surface Dynamics
issn 2196-6311
2196-632X
publishDate 2021-08-01
description <p>Catchment erosion and sedimentation are influenced by variations in the rates of rock uplift (tectonics) and periodic fluctuations in climate and vegetation cover. This study focuses on quantifying the effects of changing climate and vegetation on erosion and sedimentation over distinct climate–vegetation settings by applying the Landlab–SPACE landscape evolution model. As catchment evolution is subjected to tectonic and climate forcings at millennial to million-year timescales, the simulations are performed for different tectonic scenarios and periodicities in climate–vegetation change. We present a series of generalized experiments that explore the sensitivity of catchment hillslope and fluvial erosion as well as sedimentation for different rock uplift rates (0.05, 0.1, 0.2 mm a<span class="inline-formula"><sup>−1</sup></span>) and Milankovitch climate periodicities (23, 41, and 100 kyr). Model inputs were parameterized for two different climate and vegetation conditions at two sites in the Chilean Coastal Cordillera at <span class="inline-formula">∼26</span><span class="inline-formula"><sup>∘</sup></span> S (arid and sparsely vegetated) and <span class="inline-formula">∼33</span><span class="inline-formula"><sup>∘</sup></span> S (Mediterranean). For each setting, steady-state topographies were produced for each uplift rate before introducing periodic variations in precipitation and vegetation cover. Following this, the sensitivity of these landscapes was analyzed for 3 Myr in a transient state. Results suggest that regardless of the uplift rate, transients in precipitation and vegetation cover resulted in transients in erosion rates in the direction of change in precipitation and vegetation. The transients in sedimentation were observed to be in the opposite direction of change in the precipitation and vegetation cover, with phase lags of <span class="inline-formula">∼1.5</span>–2.5 kyr. These phase lags can be attributed to the changes in plant functional type (PFT) distribution induced by the changes in climate and the regolith production rate. These effects are most pronounced over longer-period changes (100 kyr) and higher rock uplift rates (0.2 mm yr<span class="inline-formula"><sup>−1</sup></span>). This holds true for both the vegetation and climate settings considered. Furthermore, transient changes in catchment erosion due to varying vegetation and precipitation were between <span class="inline-formula">∼35</span> % and 110 % of the background (rock uplift) rate and would be measurable with commonly used techniques (e.g., sediment flux histories, cosmogenic nuclides). Taken together, we find that vegetation-dependent erosion and sedimentation are influenced by Milankovitch timescale changes in climate but that these transient changes are superimposed upon tectonically driven rates of rock uplift.</p>
url https://esurf.copernicus.org/articles/9/1045/2021/esurf-9-1045-2021.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT hsharma effectofrockupliftandmilankovitchtimescalevariationsinprecipitationandvegetationcoveroncatchmenterosionrates
AT taehlers effectofrockupliftandmilankovitchtimescalevariationsinprecipitationandvegetationcoveroncatchmenterosionrates
AT cglotzbach effectofrockupliftandmilankovitchtimescalevariationsinprecipitationandvegetationcoveroncatchmenterosionrates
AT mschmid effectofrockupliftandmilankovitchtimescalevariationsinprecipitationandvegetationcoveroncatchmenterosionrates
AT ktielborger effectofrockupliftandmilankovitchtimescalevariationsinprecipitationandvegetationcoveroncatchmenterosionrates
_version_ 1721191826570870784