Factors That Affect the False-Negative Outcomes of Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy in Thyroid Nodules

• Main Authors: Orhan Agcaoglu, Nihat Aksakal, Beyza Ozcinar, Inanc S. Sarici, Gulcin Ercan, Meltem Kucukyilmaz, Fatih Yanar, Ibrahim A. Ozemir, Berkay Kilic, Kasim Caglayan, Dilek Yilmazbayhan, Artur Salmaslioglu, Halim Issever, Selcuk Ozarmagan, Yesim Erbil
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Hindawi Limited 2013-01-01
• Series: International Journal of Endocrinology
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/126084

Background. The purpose of this study was to assess the factors that affect the false-negative outcomes of fine-needle aspiration biopsies (FNABs) in thyroid nodules. Methods. Thyroid nodules that underwent FNAB and surgery between August 2005 and January 2012 were analyzed. FNABs were taken from the suspicious nodules regardless of nodule size. Results. Nodules were analyzed in 2 different groups: Group 1 was the false-negatives (n=81) and Group 2 was the remaining true-positives, true-negatives, and false-positives (n=649). A cytopathologist attended in 559 (77%) of FNAB procedures. There was a positive correlation between the nodule size and false-negative rates, and the absence of an interpreting cytopathologist for the examination of the FNAB procedure was the most significant parameter with a 76-fold increased risk of false-negative results. Conclusion. The contribution of cytopathologists extends the time of the procedure, and this could be a difficult practice in centres with high patient turnovers. We currently request the contribution of a cytopathologist for selected patients whom should be followed up without surgery.