Testing the recoverability of grass DNA transferred to textiles for forensic purpose

Botanical evidence such as grass stains on textiles is sometimes present in the crime scene and can allow investigators to establish an association between persons linked to the criminal event and the crime scene. In this study, extraction of grass DNA from stains on textiles was undertaken. DNA ext...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Francesc Francès
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Maejo University 2010-11-01
Series:Maejo International Journal of Science and Technology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mijst.mju.ac.th/vol4/462-467.pdf
id doaj-7628f962a8204c26acada414dda7b17f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7628f962a8204c26acada414dda7b17f2020-11-24T20:54:24ZengMaejo UniversityMaejo International Journal of Science and Technology1905-78732010-11-01403462467Testing the recoverability of grass DNA transferred to textiles for forensic purposeFrancesc FrancèsBotanical evidence such as grass stains on textiles is sometimes present in the crime scene and can allow investigators to establish an association between persons linked to the criminal event and the crime scene. In this study, extraction of grass DNA from stains on textiles was undertaken. DNA extraction was performed on four grass species conserved both indoors and outdoors for 7, 14 and 30 days after staining. Once the extracted DNA was quantified, a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplifying a fragment of the internal transcribed spacer was performed.DNA extraction was successful in 97.5% of samples. No significant differences in the amount of extracted DNA were detected among species or stain ages. However, one grass species (Cynodon dactylon) showed a significant diminution in the mean DNA concentration between indoor and outdoor samples (439.9±137 ng/µL vs. 318.9±177 ng/µL respectively; p=0.041). PCR was successful in 89.2% of samples. This study has thus demonstrated the recoverability of grass DNA from stains on cloths and its stability in the first month after staining in both outdoor and indoor environments, as well as its suitability for PCR amplification that could allow correct species identification.http://www.mijst.mju.ac.th/vol4/462-467.pdfgrass DNAforensic DNA analysisforensic science
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Francesc Francès
spellingShingle Francesc Francès
Testing the recoverability of grass DNA transferred to textiles for forensic purpose
Maejo International Journal of Science and Technology
grass DNA
forensic DNA analysis
forensic science
author_facet Francesc Francès
author_sort Francesc Francès
title Testing the recoverability of grass DNA transferred to textiles for forensic purpose
title_short Testing the recoverability of grass DNA transferred to textiles for forensic purpose
title_full Testing the recoverability of grass DNA transferred to textiles for forensic purpose
title_fullStr Testing the recoverability of grass DNA transferred to textiles for forensic purpose
title_full_unstemmed Testing the recoverability of grass DNA transferred to textiles for forensic purpose
title_sort testing the recoverability of grass dna transferred to textiles for forensic purpose
publisher Maejo University
series Maejo International Journal of Science and Technology
issn 1905-7873
publishDate 2010-11-01
description Botanical evidence such as grass stains on textiles is sometimes present in the crime scene and can allow investigators to establish an association between persons linked to the criminal event and the crime scene. In this study, extraction of grass DNA from stains on textiles was undertaken. DNA extraction was performed on four grass species conserved both indoors and outdoors for 7, 14 and 30 days after staining. Once the extracted DNA was quantified, a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplifying a fragment of the internal transcribed spacer was performed.DNA extraction was successful in 97.5% of samples. No significant differences in the amount of extracted DNA were detected among species or stain ages. However, one grass species (Cynodon dactylon) showed a significant diminution in the mean DNA concentration between indoor and outdoor samples (439.9±137 ng/µL vs. 318.9±177 ng/µL respectively; p=0.041). PCR was successful in 89.2% of samples. This study has thus demonstrated the recoverability of grass DNA from stains on cloths and its stability in the first month after staining in both outdoor and indoor environments, as well as its suitability for PCR amplification that could allow correct species identification.
topic grass DNA
forensic DNA analysis
forensic science
url http://www.mijst.mju.ac.th/vol4/462-467.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT francescfrances testingtherecoverabilityofgrassdnatransferredtotextilesforforensicpurpose
_version_ 1716794596120330240