New RER stations for Brussels? Challenges, methods and constraints

This article goes back over the debate which still remains to be settled and which divides the Brussels-Capital Region and the SNCB regarding the creation of new urban railway stations in the framework of the RER project. Our aim is to provide an objective (or at least methodologically transparent a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kevin Lebrun, Frédéric Dobruszkes
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Université Saint-Louis Bruxelles 2012-01-01
Series:Brussels Studies
Subjects:
RER
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/brussels/1076
id doaj-762e41649d1f49db897c77be3d94f07c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-762e41649d1f49db897c77be3d94f07c2020-11-24T21:27:51ZengUniversité Saint-Louis BruxellesBrussels Studies2031-02932012-01-0110.4000/brussels.1076New RER stations for Brussels? Challenges, methods and constraintsKevin LebrunFrédéric DobruszkesThis article goes back over the debate which still remains to be settled and which divides the Brussels-Capital Region and the SNCB regarding the creation of new urban railway stations in the framework of the RER project. Our aim is to provide an objective (or at least methodologically transparent and clearly presented) assessment which is up to date as regards the relevance of these stations. Thus, after presenting the problem and discussing possible methods, we propose a calculation of the potential of each of the stations proposed by the different urban planning documents of the Brussels Region.We thus illustrate the pertinence of most of them, a significant share of which are more relevant than some of the existing secondary stations in Brussels. However, the most promising stations are often those which seem the most difficult from a technical point of view. Conversely, new stations that would be the easiest to build often have the lower traffic potential.Beyond the impartiality of the results, we also insist on the fact that the decision to put a station (back) into service depends above all on political action, which reflects the fact that challenges of various dimensions and natures have been taken into account. This is illustrated in our case studies.http://journals.openedition.org/brussels/1076public transportmobilityRER
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kevin Lebrun
Frédéric Dobruszkes
spellingShingle Kevin Lebrun
Frédéric Dobruszkes
New RER stations for Brussels? Challenges, methods and constraints
Brussels Studies
public transport
mobility
RER
author_facet Kevin Lebrun
Frédéric Dobruszkes
author_sort Kevin Lebrun
title New RER stations for Brussels? Challenges, methods and constraints
title_short New RER stations for Brussels? Challenges, methods and constraints
title_full New RER stations for Brussels? Challenges, methods and constraints
title_fullStr New RER stations for Brussels? Challenges, methods and constraints
title_full_unstemmed New RER stations for Brussels? Challenges, methods and constraints
title_sort new rer stations for brussels? challenges, methods and constraints
publisher Université Saint-Louis Bruxelles
series Brussels Studies
issn 2031-0293
publishDate 2012-01-01
description This article goes back over the debate which still remains to be settled and which divides the Brussels-Capital Region and the SNCB regarding the creation of new urban railway stations in the framework of the RER project. Our aim is to provide an objective (or at least methodologically transparent and clearly presented) assessment which is up to date as regards the relevance of these stations. Thus, after presenting the problem and discussing possible methods, we propose a calculation of the potential of each of the stations proposed by the different urban planning documents of the Brussels Region.We thus illustrate the pertinence of most of them, a significant share of which are more relevant than some of the existing secondary stations in Brussels. However, the most promising stations are often those which seem the most difficult from a technical point of view. Conversely, new stations that would be the easiest to build often have the lower traffic potential.Beyond the impartiality of the results, we also insist on the fact that the decision to put a station (back) into service depends above all on political action, which reflects the fact that challenges of various dimensions and natures have been taken into account. This is illustrated in our case studies.
topic public transport
mobility
RER
url http://journals.openedition.org/brussels/1076
work_keys_str_mv AT kevinlebrun newrerstationsforbrusselschallengesmethodsandconstraints
AT fredericdobruszkes newrerstationsforbrusselschallengesmethodsandconstraints
_version_ 1725972963436527616