The reliability of transabdominal cervical length measurement in a low-risk obstetric population: Comparison with transvaginal measurement

Objective: To determine the correlation between transabdominal (TA) and transvaginal (TV) cervical length measurement in a low-risk obstetric population in Taiwan. Materials and methods: Women with a singleton pregnancy between 20 weeks and 24 weeks of gestation underwent postvoid TA and TV cervical...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cheng-Ran Peng, Chie-Pein Chen, Kuo-Gon Wang, Liang-Kai Wang, Chen-Yu Chen, Yi-Yung Chen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2015-04-01
Series:Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1028455915000315
id doaj-7653d5e417a644d7984a2654e8e62f4e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7653d5e417a644d7984a2654e8e62f4e2020-11-24T22:07:39ZengElsevierTaiwanese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology1028-45592015-04-0154216717110.1016/j.tjog.2014.03.007The reliability of transabdominal cervical length measurement in a low-risk obstetric population: Comparison with transvaginal measurementCheng-Ran Peng0Chie-Pein Chen1Kuo-Gon Wang2Liang-Kai Wang3Chen-Yu Chen4Yi-Yung Chen5Division of High Risk Pregnancy, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, TaiwanDivision of High Risk Pregnancy, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, TaiwanDivision of High Risk Pregnancy, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, TaiwanDivision of High Risk Pregnancy, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, TaiwanDivision of High Risk Pregnancy, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, TaiwanDivision of High Risk Pregnancy, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, TaiwanObjective: To determine the correlation between transabdominal (TA) and transvaginal (TV) cervical length measurement in a low-risk obstetric population in Taiwan. Materials and methods: Women with a singleton pregnancy between 20 weeks and 24 weeks of gestation underwent postvoid TA and TV cervical length measurements. Differences between the measurements obtained using the two methods were evaluated. Results: Two hundred and five women agreed to participate in the study. Paired TA and TV measurements were obtained in 174 women. The mean TA cervical length was 36.0 ± 4.9 mm and the mean TV cervical length was 37.6 ± 5.4 mm. The mean TA cervical length was shorter than the mean TV cervical length by 1.6 mm. The 5th percentile of TA and TV cervical length was 29 mm and 29.1 mm, respectively. The discrepancies between the two methods were not significantly correlated with maternal body mass index (BMI). All women with TV cervical length <25 mm had a corresponding TA cervical length <29 mm. Conclusion: The TA cervical length could be obtained in the majority of the low-risk pregnant women in the present study, and the TA cervical length was closely correlated with the TV cervical length. The use of TA ultrasound could be an effective initial tool for cervical length screening in low-risk pregnant women. TA cervical length <29 mm (5th percentile) could be used as a cut-off value for further TV ultrasound.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1028455915000315cervical length screeningpreterm deliverytransabdominal ultrasound
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Cheng-Ran Peng
Chie-Pein Chen
Kuo-Gon Wang
Liang-Kai Wang
Chen-Yu Chen
Yi-Yung Chen
spellingShingle Cheng-Ran Peng
Chie-Pein Chen
Kuo-Gon Wang
Liang-Kai Wang
Chen-Yu Chen
Yi-Yung Chen
The reliability of transabdominal cervical length measurement in a low-risk obstetric population: Comparison with transvaginal measurement
Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
cervical length screening
preterm delivery
transabdominal ultrasound
author_facet Cheng-Ran Peng
Chie-Pein Chen
Kuo-Gon Wang
Liang-Kai Wang
Chen-Yu Chen
Yi-Yung Chen
author_sort Cheng-Ran Peng
title The reliability of transabdominal cervical length measurement in a low-risk obstetric population: Comparison with transvaginal measurement
title_short The reliability of transabdominal cervical length measurement in a low-risk obstetric population: Comparison with transvaginal measurement
title_full The reliability of transabdominal cervical length measurement in a low-risk obstetric population: Comparison with transvaginal measurement
title_fullStr The reliability of transabdominal cervical length measurement in a low-risk obstetric population: Comparison with transvaginal measurement
title_full_unstemmed The reliability of transabdominal cervical length measurement in a low-risk obstetric population: Comparison with transvaginal measurement
title_sort reliability of transabdominal cervical length measurement in a low-risk obstetric population: comparison with transvaginal measurement
publisher Elsevier
series Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
issn 1028-4559
publishDate 2015-04-01
description Objective: To determine the correlation between transabdominal (TA) and transvaginal (TV) cervical length measurement in a low-risk obstetric population in Taiwan. Materials and methods: Women with a singleton pregnancy between 20 weeks and 24 weeks of gestation underwent postvoid TA and TV cervical length measurements. Differences between the measurements obtained using the two methods were evaluated. Results: Two hundred and five women agreed to participate in the study. Paired TA and TV measurements were obtained in 174 women. The mean TA cervical length was 36.0 ± 4.9 mm and the mean TV cervical length was 37.6 ± 5.4 mm. The mean TA cervical length was shorter than the mean TV cervical length by 1.6 mm. The 5th percentile of TA and TV cervical length was 29 mm and 29.1 mm, respectively. The discrepancies between the two methods were not significantly correlated with maternal body mass index (BMI). All women with TV cervical length <25 mm had a corresponding TA cervical length <29 mm. Conclusion: The TA cervical length could be obtained in the majority of the low-risk pregnant women in the present study, and the TA cervical length was closely correlated with the TV cervical length. The use of TA ultrasound could be an effective initial tool for cervical length screening in low-risk pregnant women. TA cervical length <29 mm (5th percentile) could be used as a cut-off value for further TV ultrasound.
topic cervical length screening
preterm delivery
transabdominal ultrasound
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1028455915000315
work_keys_str_mv AT chengranpeng thereliabilityoftransabdominalcervicallengthmeasurementinalowriskobstetricpopulationcomparisonwithtransvaginalmeasurement
AT chiepeinchen thereliabilityoftransabdominalcervicallengthmeasurementinalowriskobstetricpopulationcomparisonwithtransvaginalmeasurement
AT kuogonwang thereliabilityoftransabdominalcervicallengthmeasurementinalowriskobstetricpopulationcomparisonwithtransvaginalmeasurement
AT liangkaiwang thereliabilityoftransabdominalcervicallengthmeasurementinalowriskobstetricpopulationcomparisonwithtransvaginalmeasurement
AT chenyuchen thereliabilityoftransabdominalcervicallengthmeasurementinalowriskobstetricpopulationcomparisonwithtransvaginalmeasurement
AT yiyungchen thereliabilityoftransabdominalcervicallengthmeasurementinalowriskobstetricpopulationcomparisonwithtransvaginalmeasurement
AT chengranpeng reliabilityoftransabdominalcervicallengthmeasurementinalowriskobstetricpopulationcomparisonwithtransvaginalmeasurement
AT chiepeinchen reliabilityoftransabdominalcervicallengthmeasurementinalowriskobstetricpopulationcomparisonwithtransvaginalmeasurement
AT kuogonwang reliabilityoftransabdominalcervicallengthmeasurementinalowriskobstetricpopulationcomparisonwithtransvaginalmeasurement
AT liangkaiwang reliabilityoftransabdominalcervicallengthmeasurementinalowriskobstetricpopulationcomparisonwithtransvaginalmeasurement
AT chenyuchen reliabilityoftransabdominalcervicallengthmeasurementinalowriskobstetricpopulationcomparisonwithtransvaginalmeasurement
AT yiyungchen reliabilityoftransabdominalcervicallengthmeasurementinalowriskobstetricpopulationcomparisonwithtransvaginalmeasurement
_version_ 1725819303943471104