Pinpointing the optimal spatial frequency range for automatic neural facial fear processing

Faces convey an assortment of emotional information via low and high spatial frequencies (LSFs and HSFs). However, there is no consensus on the role of particular spatial frequency (SF) information during facial fear processing. Comparison across studies is hampered by the high variability in cut-of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stephanie Van der Donck, Tiffany Tang, Milena Dzhelyova, Johan Wagemans, Bart Boets
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2020-11-01
Series:NeuroImage
Subjects:
EEG
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811920306376
id doaj-766a73d1c9ad405d966785c883ff2ddb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-766a73d1c9ad405d966785c883ff2ddb2020-12-13T04:17:53ZengElsevierNeuroImage1095-95722020-11-01221117151Pinpointing the optimal spatial frequency range for automatic neural facial fear processingStephanie Van der Donck0Tiffany Tang1Milena Dzhelyova2Johan Wagemans3Bart Boets4Center for Developmental Psychiatry, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Leuven Autism Research (LAuRes), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Corresponding author. Kapucijnenvoer 7 blok h - box 7001, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.Center for Developmental Psychiatry, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, BelgiumInstitute of Research in Psychological Sciences, Institute of Neuroscience, Université de Louvain, Louvain-La-Neuve, BelgiumLeuven Autism Research (LAuRes), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Brain and Cognition, KU Leuven, BelgiumCenter for Developmental Psychiatry, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Leuven Autism Research (LAuRes), KU Leuven, Leuven, BelgiumFaces convey an assortment of emotional information via low and high spatial frequencies (LSFs and HSFs). However, there is no consensus on the role of particular spatial frequency (SF) information during facial fear processing. Comparison across studies is hampered by the high variability in cut-off values for demarcating the SF spectrum and by differences in task demands. We investigated which SF information is minimally required to rapidly detect briefly presented fearful faces in an implicit and automatic manner, by sweeping through an entire SF range without constraints of predefined cut-offs for LSFs and HSFs. We combined fast periodic visual stimulation with electroencephalography. We presented neutral faces at 6 ​Hz, periodically interleaved every 5th image with a fearful face, allowing us to quantify an objective neural index of fear discrimination at exactly 1.2 ​Hz. We started from a stimulus containing either only very low or very high SFs and gradually increased the SF content by adding higher or lower SF information, respectively, to reach the full SF spectrum over the course of 70 ​s. We found that faces require at least SF information higher than 5.93 cycles per image (cpi) to implicitly differentiate fearful from neutral faces. However, exclusive HSF faces, even in a restricted SF range between 94.82 and 189.63 cpi already carry the critical information to extract the emotional expression of the faces.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811920306376EEGFPVSFacial emotion processingImplicit fear detectionSpatial frequency
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Stephanie Van der Donck
Tiffany Tang
Milena Dzhelyova
Johan Wagemans
Bart Boets
spellingShingle Stephanie Van der Donck
Tiffany Tang
Milena Dzhelyova
Johan Wagemans
Bart Boets
Pinpointing the optimal spatial frequency range for automatic neural facial fear processing
NeuroImage
EEG
FPVS
Facial emotion processing
Implicit fear detection
Spatial frequency
author_facet Stephanie Van der Donck
Tiffany Tang
Milena Dzhelyova
Johan Wagemans
Bart Boets
author_sort Stephanie Van der Donck
title Pinpointing the optimal spatial frequency range for automatic neural facial fear processing
title_short Pinpointing the optimal spatial frequency range for automatic neural facial fear processing
title_full Pinpointing the optimal spatial frequency range for automatic neural facial fear processing
title_fullStr Pinpointing the optimal spatial frequency range for automatic neural facial fear processing
title_full_unstemmed Pinpointing the optimal spatial frequency range for automatic neural facial fear processing
title_sort pinpointing the optimal spatial frequency range for automatic neural facial fear processing
publisher Elsevier
series NeuroImage
issn 1095-9572
publishDate 2020-11-01
description Faces convey an assortment of emotional information via low and high spatial frequencies (LSFs and HSFs). However, there is no consensus on the role of particular spatial frequency (SF) information during facial fear processing. Comparison across studies is hampered by the high variability in cut-off values for demarcating the SF spectrum and by differences in task demands. We investigated which SF information is minimally required to rapidly detect briefly presented fearful faces in an implicit and automatic manner, by sweeping through an entire SF range without constraints of predefined cut-offs for LSFs and HSFs. We combined fast periodic visual stimulation with electroencephalography. We presented neutral faces at 6 ​Hz, periodically interleaved every 5th image with a fearful face, allowing us to quantify an objective neural index of fear discrimination at exactly 1.2 ​Hz. We started from a stimulus containing either only very low or very high SFs and gradually increased the SF content by adding higher or lower SF information, respectively, to reach the full SF spectrum over the course of 70 ​s. We found that faces require at least SF information higher than 5.93 cycles per image (cpi) to implicitly differentiate fearful from neutral faces. However, exclusive HSF faces, even in a restricted SF range between 94.82 and 189.63 cpi already carry the critical information to extract the emotional expression of the faces.
topic EEG
FPVS
Facial emotion processing
Implicit fear detection
Spatial frequency
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811920306376
work_keys_str_mv AT stephanievanderdonck pinpointingtheoptimalspatialfrequencyrangeforautomaticneuralfacialfearprocessing
AT tiffanytang pinpointingtheoptimalspatialfrequencyrangeforautomaticneuralfacialfearprocessing
AT milenadzhelyova pinpointingtheoptimalspatialfrequencyrangeforautomaticneuralfacialfearprocessing
AT johanwagemans pinpointingtheoptimalspatialfrequencyrangeforautomaticneuralfacialfearprocessing
AT bartboets pinpointingtheoptimalspatialfrequencyrangeforautomaticneuralfacialfearprocessing
_version_ 1724385540977983488