How Does the Social Grouping of Animals in Nature Protect Against Sickness? A Perspective

Sickness behavior is broadly represented in vertebrates, usually in association with the fever response in response to acute infections. The reactions to sickness behavior in a group member or potential group member in humans is quite variable, depending upon circumstances. In animals, the reactions...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lynette A. Hart, Benjamin L. Hart
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-07-01
Series:Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnbeh.2021.672097/full
id doaj-76756b8805cd4c0fb291a9267e12db62
record_format Article
spelling doaj-76756b8805cd4c0fb291a9267e12db622021-07-07T04:48:59ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience1662-51532021-07-011510.3389/fnbeh.2021.672097672097How Does the Social Grouping of Animals in Nature Protect Against Sickness? A PerspectiveLynette A. Hart0Benjamin L. Hart1Department of Population Health and Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United StatesDepartment of Anatomy, Physiology and Cell Biology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United StatesSickness behavior is broadly represented in vertebrates, usually in association with the fever response in response to acute infections. The reactions to sickness behavior in a group member or potential group member in humans is quite variable, depending upon circumstances. In animals, the reactions to sickness behavior in a group member or potential group member evoke a specific response that reflects the species-specific lifestyle. Groups of animals can employ varied strategies to reduce or address exposure to sickness. Most of these have scarcely been studied in nature from a disease perspective: (1) adjusting exposure to sick conspecifics or contaminated areas; (2) caring for a sick group member; (3) peripheralization and agonistic behaviors to strange non-group conspecifics; and (4) using special strategies at parturition when newborn are healthy but vulnerable. Unexplored in this regard is infanticide, where newborn that are born with very little immunity until they receive antibody-rich colostrum, could be a target of maternal infanticide if they manifest signs of sickness and could be infectious to littermates. The strategies used by different species are highly specific and dependent upon the particular circumstances. What is needed is a more general awareness and consideration of the possibilities that avoiding or adapting to sickness behavior may be driving some social behaviors of animals in nature.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnbeh.2021.672097/fulldisease exposureinfanticideinfectionpathogensocial behavior
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lynette A. Hart
Benjamin L. Hart
spellingShingle Lynette A. Hart
Benjamin L. Hart
How Does the Social Grouping of Animals in Nature Protect Against Sickness? A Perspective
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
disease exposure
infanticide
infection
pathogen
social behavior
author_facet Lynette A. Hart
Benjamin L. Hart
author_sort Lynette A. Hart
title How Does the Social Grouping of Animals in Nature Protect Against Sickness? A Perspective
title_short How Does the Social Grouping of Animals in Nature Protect Against Sickness? A Perspective
title_full How Does the Social Grouping of Animals in Nature Protect Against Sickness? A Perspective
title_fullStr How Does the Social Grouping of Animals in Nature Protect Against Sickness? A Perspective
title_full_unstemmed How Does the Social Grouping of Animals in Nature Protect Against Sickness? A Perspective
title_sort how does the social grouping of animals in nature protect against sickness? a perspective
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
issn 1662-5153
publishDate 2021-07-01
description Sickness behavior is broadly represented in vertebrates, usually in association with the fever response in response to acute infections. The reactions to sickness behavior in a group member or potential group member in humans is quite variable, depending upon circumstances. In animals, the reactions to sickness behavior in a group member or potential group member evoke a specific response that reflects the species-specific lifestyle. Groups of animals can employ varied strategies to reduce or address exposure to sickness. Most of these have scarcely been studied in nature from a disease perspective: (1) adjusting exposure to sick conspecifics or contaminated areas; (2) caring for a sick group member; (3) peripheralization and agonistic behaviors to strange non-group conspecifics; and (4) using special strategies at parturition when newborn are healthy but vulnerable. Unexplored in this regard is infanticide, where newborn that are born with very little immunity until they receive antibody-rich colostrum, could be a target of maternal infanticide if they manifest signs of sickness and could be infectious to littermates. The strategies used by different species are highly specific and dependent upon the particular circumstances. What is needed is a more general awareness and consideration of the possibilities that avoiding or adapting to sickness behavior may be driving some social behaviors of animals in nature.
topic disease exposure
infanticide
infection
pathogen
social behavior
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnbeh.2021.672097/full
work_keys_str_mv AT lynetteahart howdoesthesocialgroupingofanimalsinnatureprotectagainstsicknessaperspective
AT benjaminlhart howdoesthesocialgroupingofanimalsinnatureprotectagainstsicknessaperspective
_version_ 1721316854725607424