Psychometric testing of immigrants and natives in an acute psychiatry facility

The diagnostic process after referral to an acute psychiatric treatment facility consists of more than the clinical investigation and laboratory tests. Psychometric tests in a broad range of languages may be such an augmentation of our diagnostic armamentarium. Whether such tests are in use, and how...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: John E. Berg
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Emerald Publishing 2018-01-01
Series:Mental Illness
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.pagepress.org/journals/index.php/mi/article/view/6987
id doaj-767c8ea155654c3ba7883912aaf0b0b5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-767c8ea155654c3ba7883912aaf0b0b52020-11-25T03:44:22ZengEmerald PublishingMental Illness2036-74572036-74652018-01-019210.4081/mi.2017.69873867Psychometric testing of immigrants and natives in an acute psychiatry facilityJohn E. Berg0Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo and Akershus University Hospital, OsloThe diagnostic process after referral to an acute psychiatric treatment facility consists of more than the clinical investigation and laboratory tests. Psychometric tests in a broad range of languages may be such an augmentation of our diagnostic armamentarium. Whether such tests are in use, and how they are distributed among different patient categories was the aim of the study. All referrals in one calendar year (N=1168), as they are depicted in the hospital computerized medical records, were investigated. Fifty-six (6.1%) out of 926 ethnic Norwegians and six (3.0%) out of 198 non-Western immigrants were tested, whereas none of the 44 Western immigrants. The difference between ethnic Norwegians and the immigrants was significant (Z=-3.05 and P=0.002). Psychometric tests were thus almost not in use, and even lesser so in immigrants. Mean number of resident days was higher among those tested, 11.7 (SD=11.2) versus those not tested, 7.4 (SD=10.4) days, t=2.97 and P=0.004. Length of stay for ethnic Norwegians did not differ from that for non-Western immigrants 11.4 versus 11.7, respectively. The patients tested were older than those not tested. Mean age was 43.0 (SD=14.4) versus 38.8 (SD=12.1), with a t=2.65 and P=0.03. The difference in resident days between all immigrants and ethnic Norwegians was significant with a Z=- 2.232 and P=0.026. Level of testing was higher in ethnic Norwegians, and the tested patients stayed longer, maybe indicating more room for testing. Whether this low test-activity influences treatment quality is an unsettled question.http://www.pagepress.org/journals/index.php/mi/article/view/6987Psychometric tests, ethnicity, acute ward
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author John E. Berg
spellingShingle John E. Berg
Psychometric testing of immigrants and natives in an acute psychiatry facility
Mental Illness
Psychometric tests, ethnicity, acute ward
author_facet John E. Berg
author_sort John E. Berg
title Psychometric testing of immigrants and natives in an acute psychiatry facility
title_short Psychometric testing of immigrants and natives in an acute psychiatry facility
title_full Psychometric testing of immigrants and natives in an acute psychiatry facility
title_fullStr Psychometric testing of immigrants and natives in an acute psychiatry facility
title_full_unstemmed Psychometric testing of immigrants and natives in an acute psychiatry facility
title_sort psychometric testing of immigrants and natives in an acute psychiatry facility
publisher Emerald Publishing
series Mental Illness
issn 2036-7457
2036-7465
publishDate 2018-01-01
description The diagnostic process after referral to an acute psychiatric treatment facility consists of more than the clinical investigation and laboratory tests. Psychometric tests in a broad range of languages may be such an augmentation of our diagnostic armamentarium. Whether such tests are in use, and how they are distributed among different patient categories was the aim of the study. All referrals in one calendar year (N=1168), as they are depicted in the hospital computerized medical records, were investigated. Fifty-six (6.1%) out of 926 ethnic Norwegians and six (3.0%) out of 198 non-Western immigrants were tested, whereas none of the 44 Western immigrants. The difference between ethnic Norwegians and the immigrants was significant (Z=-3.05 and P=0.002). Psychometric tests were thus almost not in use, and even lesser so in immigrants. Mean number of resident days was higher among those tested, 11.7 (SD=11.2) versus those not tested, 7.4 (SD=10.4) days, t=2.97 and P=0.004. Length of stay for ethnic Norwegians did not differ from that for non-Western immigrants 11.4 versus 11.7, respectively. The patients tested were older than those not tested. Mean age was 43.0 (SD=14.4) versus 38.8 (SD=12.1), with a t=2.65 and P=0.03. The difference in resident days between all immigrants and ethnic Norwegians was significant with a Z=- 2.232 and P=0.026. Level of testing was higher in ethnic Norwegians, and the tested patients stayed longer, maybe indicating more room for testing. Whether this low test-activity influences treatment quality is an unsettled question.
topic Psychometric tests, ethnicity, acute ward
url http://www.pagepress.org/journals/index.php/mi/article/view/6987
work_keys_str_mv AT johneberg psychometrictestingofimmigrantsandnativesinanacutepsychiatryfacility
_version_ 1724515389766893568