Negotiating Comfort in the Metropolis: Peter Cook, Toyō Itō, and the Shinkenchiku Residential Design Competition, 1977 and 1988

This investigation approaches the annual Shinkenchiku Residential Design Competition (1965-2020) as a productive cross-cultural medium of exchange that generates new architectural knowledge. It situates this international competition of ideas in a long history of transnational encounters, to identif...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Cathelijne Nuijsink
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Institut National d'Histoire de l'Art 2021-04-01
Series:ABE Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/abe/10444
id doaj-76800c416c8b4a2186444a4da7348ea0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-76800c416c8b4a2186444a4da7348ea02021-07-08T16:46:58ZdeuInstitut National d'Histoire de l'ArtABE Journal2275-66392021-04-011810.4000/abe.10444Negotiating Comfort in the Metropolis: Peter Cook, Toyō Itō, and the Shinkenchiku Residential Design Competition, 1977 and 1988Cathelijne NuijsinkThis investigation approaches the annual Shinkenchiku Residential Design Competition (1965-2020) as a productive cross-cultural medium of exchange that generates new architectural knowledge. It situates this international competition of ideas in a long history of transnational encounters, to identify the contours of the ideological shift from the consolidation of modernist ideals to their critique. The paper highlights the iteration of the lack of “comfort” of modernist architecture, tracing the origins of this critique by referencing the 1977 and 1988 competitions, during which the respective judges Peter Cook and Toyō Itō challenged architects to devise innovative housing proposals to attain “comfort in the metropolis.” It initially employs a synchronic approach to investigate the origins of Cook’s competition theme, the multiple winning entries, the judges’ final remarks, and the after-effects of the competitions to apprehend how discrete geographies negotiated the notion of comfort. Next, the paper juxtaposes the outcomes of both years of the competition to offer a diachronic analysis of how architects have conceived the house and the city differently through time. This investigation reveals that the mechanism of this longstanding, idea-based competition confronts two judges’ positions to understand their cultural and architectural differences.http://journals.openedition.org/abe/10444comfortmetropoliscross-cultural exchangeShinkenchiku Residential Design Competition
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Cathelijne Nuijsink
spellingShingle Cathelijne Nuijsink
Negotiating Comfort in the Metropolis: Peter Cook, Toyō Itō, and the Shinkenchiku Residential Design Competition, 1977 and 1988
ABE Journal
comfort
metropolis
cross-cultural exchange
Shinkenchiku Residential Design Competition
author_facet Cathelijne Nuijsink
author_sort Cathelijne Nuijsink
title Negotiating Comfort in the Metropolis: Peter Cook, Toyō Itō, and the Shinkenchiku Residential Design Competition, 1977 and 1988
title_short Negotiating Comfort in the Metropolis: Peter Cook, Toyō Itō, and the Shinkenchiku Residential Design Competition, 1977 and 1988
title_full Negotiating Comfort in the Metropolis: Peter Cook, Toyō Itō, and the Shinkenchiku Residential Design Competition, 1977 and 1988
title_fullStr Negotiating Comfort in the Metropolis: Peter Cook, Toyō Itō, and the Shinkenchiku Residential Design Competition, 1977 and 1988
title_full_unstemmed Negotiating Comfort in the Metropolis: Peter Cook, Toyō Itō, and the Shinkenchiku Residential Design Competition, 1977 and 1988
title_sort negotiating comfort in the metropolis: peter cook, toyō itō, and the shinkenchiku residential design competition, 1977 and 1988
publisher Institut National d'Histoire de l'Art
series ABE Journal
issn 2275-6639
publishDate 2021-04-01
description This investigation approaches the annual Shinkenchiku Residential Design Competition (1965-2020) as a productive cross-cultural medium of exchange that generates new architectural knowledge. It situates this international competition of ideas in a long history of transnational encounters, to identify the contours of the ideological shift from the consolidation of modernist ideals to their critique. The paper highlights the iteration of the lack of “comfort” of modernist architecture, tracing the origins of this critique by referencing the 1977 and 1988 competitions, during which the respective judges Peter Cook and Toyō Itō challenged architects to devise innovative housing proposals to attain “comfort in the metropolis.” It initially employs a synchronic approach to investigate the origins of Cook’s competition theme, the multiple winning entries, the judges’ final remarks, and the after-effects of the competitions to apprehend how discrete geographies negotiated the notion of comfort. Next, the paper juxtaposes the outcomes of both years of the competition to offer a diachronic analysis of how architects have conceived the house and the city differently through time. This investigation reveals that the mechanism of this longstanding, idea-based competition confronts two judges’ positions to understand their cultural and architectural differences.
topic comfort
metropolis
cross-cultural exchange
Shinkenchiku Residential Design Competition
url http://journals.openedition.org/abe/10444
work_keys_str_mv AT cathelijnenuijsink negotiatingcomfortinthemetropolispetercooktoyoitoandtheshinkenchikuresidentialdesigncompetition1977and1988
_version_ 1721312777752018944