Joining Criteria for Harmonizing European Forest Available for Wood Supply Estimates. Case Studies from National Forest Inventories

• Main Authors: Christoph Fischer, Patrizia Gasparini, Martin Nylander, John Redmond, Laura Hernandez, Urs-Beat Brändli, Alejandro Pastor, Maria Rizzo, Iciar Alberdi
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: MDPI AG 2016-05-01
• Series: Forests
• Subjects: forest area; wood resources; wood supply; economic; environmental; social; restriction
• Online Access: http://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/7/5/104

For national and international reporting on forest available for wood supply (FAWS), harmonized data are needed. This information is required as forests provide goods for various sectors like the timber industry or the bioenergy sector. The effect of applying different thresholds to the three restriction classes (environmental, social and economic restriction) within the proposed reference definition for FAWS was evaluated. We applied the reference definition for FAWS to national data sets provided by five European National Forest Inventories using harmonized thresholds. The effects on FAWS area and growing stock were evaluated for each restriction and threshold. All countries within this study could report on protected areas. Social restrictions were not applied in any country, data on other restrictions are available but definitions vary. The application of common thresholds for restrictions proved difficult as effects vary between countries. The economic restriction is the most challenging to assess as many countries do not have corresponding data for direct calculation of, e.g., harvesting costs. Using proxies for harvesting costs was difficult, as common thresholds may not be applied in different countries. For standardized reporting, a FAWS definition should be developed that utilizes existing, harmonized indicators to describe restrictions.