A Review of Economic Evaluations of Tobacco Control Programs

Each year, an estimated 443,000 people die of smoking-related diseases in the United States. Cigarette smoking results in more than $193 billion in medical costs and productivity losses annually.In an effort to reduce this burden, many states, the federal government, and several national organizatio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jennifer W. Kahende, Bishwa Adhikari, Brett R. Loomis, LaTisha Marshall
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2008-12-01
Series:International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/6/1/51/
id doaj-76cc19207cff4e72a87cc8b44cd1320c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-76cc19207cff4e72a87cc8b44cd1320c2020-11-24T21:05:59ZengMDPI AGInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health1660-46012008-12-0161516810.3390/ijerph6010051A Review of Economic Evaluations of Tobacco Control ProgramsJennifer W. KahendeBishwa AdhikariBrett R. LoomisLaTisha MarshallEach year, an estimated 443,000 people die of smoking-related diseases in the United States. Cigarette smoking results in more than $193 billion in medical costs and productivity losses annually.In an effort to reduce this burden, many states, the federal government, and several national organizations fund tobacco control programs and policies. For this report we reviewed existing literature on economic evaluations of tobacco control interventions. We found that smoking cessation therapies, including nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) and self-help are most commonly studied. There are far fewer studies on other important interventions, such as price and tax increases, media campaigns, smoke free air laws and workplace smoking interventions, quitlines, youth access enforcement, school-based programs, and community-based programs. Although there are obvious gaps in the literature, the existing studies show in almost every case that tobacco control programs and policies are either cost-saving or highly cost-effective.http://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/6/1/51/Economic evaluationcost-effectivenesssmokingtobacco usesmoking cessation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jennifer W. Kahende
Bishwa Adhikari
Brett R. Loomis
LaTisha Marshall
spellingShingle Jennifer W. Kahende
Bishwa Adhikari
Brett R. Loomis
LaTisha Marshall
A Review of Economic Evaluations of Tobacco Control Programs
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Economic evaluation
cost-effectiveness
smoking
tobacco use
smoking cessation
author_facet Jennifer W. Kahende
Bishwa Adhikari
Brett R. Loomis
LaTisha Marshall
author_sort Jennifer W. Kahende
title A Review of Economic Evaluations of Tobacco Control Programs
title_short A Review of Economic Evaluations of Tobacco Control Programs
title_full A Review of Economic Evaluations of Tobacco Control Programs
title_fullStr A Review of Economic Evaluations of Tobacco Control Programs
title_full_unstemmed A Review of Economic Evaluations of Tobacco Control Programs
title_sort review of economic evaluations of tobacco control programs
publisher MDPI AG
series International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
issn 1660-4601
publishDate 2008-12-01
description Each year, an estimated 443,000 people die of smoking-related diseases in the United States. Cigarette smoking results in more than $193 billion in medical costs and productivity losses annually.In an effort to reduce this burden, many states, the federal government, and several national organizations fund tobacco control programs and policies. For this report we reviewed existing literature on economic evaluations of tobacco control interventions. We found that smoking cessation therapies, including nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) and self-help are most commonly studied. There are far fewer studies on other important interventions, such as price and tax increases, media campaigns, smoke free air laws and workplace smoking interventions, quitlines, youth access enforcement, school-based programs, and community-based programs. Although there are obvious gaps in the literature, the existing studies show in almost every case that tobacco control programs and policies are either cost-saving or highly cost-effective.
topic Economic evaluation
cost-effectiveness
smoking
tobacco use
smoking cessation
url http://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/6/1/51/
work_keys_str_mv AT jenniferwkahende areviewofeconomicevaluationsoftobaccocontrolprograms
AT bishwaadhikari areviewofeconomicevaluationsoftobaccocontrolprograms
AT brettrloomis areviewofeconomicevaluationsoftobaccocontrolprograms
AT latishamarshall areviewofeconomicevaluationsoftobaccocontrolprograms
AT jenniferwkahende reviewofeconomicevaluationsoftobaccocontrolprograms
AT bishwaadhikari reviewofeconomicevaluationsoftobaccocontrolprograms
AT brettrloomis reviewofeconomicevaluationsoftobaccocontrolprograms
AT latishamarshall reviewofeconomicevaluationsoftobaccocontrolprograms
_version_ 1716767155387629568