Volumetric-modulated arc therapy lung stereotactic body radiation therapy dosimetric quality assurance: A comparison between radiochromic film and chamber array
Introduction: The aim of this work is to verify the use of radiochromic film in the quality assurance (QA) of volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) plans and compare the results with those obtained using an ion chamber array. Materials and Methods: Q...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2017-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Medical Physics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.jmp.org.in/article.asp?issn=0971-6203;year=2017;volume=42;issue=3;spage=133;epage=139;aulast=Mata |
id |
doaj-76d1e32c18814b4bab0316bff07ab48f |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-76d1e32c18814b4bab0316bff07ab48f2020-11-24T23:34:47ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Medical Physics0971-62031998-39132017-01-0142313313910.4103/jmp.JMP_130_16Volumetric-modulated arc therapy lung stereotactic body radiation therapy dosimetric quality assurance: A comparison between radiochromic film and chamber arrayJuan Fernando Mata ColodroAlfredo Serna BernáVicente Puchades PuchadesDavid Ramos AmoresMiguel Alcaraz BañosIntroduction: The aim of this work is to verify the use of radiochromic film in the quality assurance (QA) of volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) plans and compare the results with those obtained using an ion chamber array. Materials and Methods: QA was performed for 14 plans using a two-dimensional-array seven29 and EBT3 film. Dose values per session ranged between 7.5 Gy and 18 Gy. The multichannel method was used to obtain a dose map for film. Results: The results obtained were compared with treatment planning system calculated profiles through gamma analysis. Passing criteria were 3%/3 mm, 2%/2 mm and 3%/1.5 mm with maximum and local dose (LD) normalization. Mean gamma passing rate (GPR) (percentage of points presenting a gamma function value of <1) was obtained and compared. Calibration curves were obtained for each color channel within the dose range 0–16 Gy. Mean GPR values for film were> 98.9% for all criteria when normalizing per maximum dose. When using LD, normalization was> 92.7%. GPR values for the array were lower for all criteria; this difference being statistically significant when normalizing at LD, reaching 12% for the 3%/1.5 mm criterion. Conclusion: Both detectors provide satisfactory results for the QA of plans for VMAT lung SBRT. The film provided greater mean GPR values, afforded greater spatial resolution and was more efficient overall.http://www.jmp.org.in/article.asp?issn=0971-6203;year=2017;volume=42;issue=3;spage=133;epage=139;aulast=MataIon chamber arraylung stereotactic body radiation therapyradiochromic filmvolumetric-modulated arc therapy |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Juan Fernando Mata Colodro Alfredo Serna Berná Vicente Puchades Puchades David Ramos Amores Miguel Alcaraz Baños |
spellingShingle |
Juan Fernando Mata Colodro Alfredo Serna Berná Vicente Puchades Puchades David Ramos Amores Miguel Alcaraz Baños Volumetric-modulated arc therapy lung stereotactic body radiation therapy dosimetric quality assurance: A comparison between radiochromic film and chamber array Journal of Medical Physics Ion chamber array lung stereotactic body radiation therapy radiochromic film volumetric-modulated arc therapy |
author_facet |
Juan Fernando Mata Colodro Alfredo Serna Berná Vicente Puchades Puchades David Ramos Amores Miguel Alcaraz Baños |
author_sort |
Juan Fernando Mata Colodro |
title |
Volumetric-modulated arc therapy lung stereotactic body radiation therapy dosimetric quality assurance: A comparison between radiochromic film and chamber array |
title_short |
Volumetric-modulated arc therapy lung stereotactic body radiation therapy dosimetric quality assurance: A comparison between radiochromic film and chamber array |
title_full |
Volumetric-modulated arc therapy lung stereotactic body radiation therapy dosimetric quality assurance: A comparison between radiochromic film and chamber array |
title_fullStr |
Volumetric-modulated arc therapy lung stereotactic body radiation therapy dosimetric quality assurance: A comparison between radiochromic film and chamber array |
title_full_unstemmed |
Volumetric-modulated arc therapy lung stereotactic body radiation therapy dosimetric quality assurance: A comparison between radiochromic film and chamber array |
title_sort |
volumetric-modulated arc therapy lung stereotactic body radiation therapy dosimetric quality assurance: a comparison between radiochromic film and chamber array |
publisher |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
series |
Journal of Medical Physics |
issn |
0971-6203 1998-3913 |
publishDate |
2017-01-01 |
description |
Introduction: The aim of this work is to verify the use of radiochromic film in the quality assurance (QA) of volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) plans and compare the results with those obtained using an ion chamber array. Materials and Methods: QA was performed for 14 plans using a two-dimensional-array seven29 and EBT3 film. Dose values per session ranged between 7.5 Gy and 18 Gy. The multichannel method was used to obtain a dose map for film. Results: The results obtained were compared with treatment planning system calculated profiles through gamma analysis. Passing criteria were 3%/3 mm, 2%/2 mm and 3%/1.5 mm with maximum and local dose (LD) normalization. Mean gamma passing rate (GPR) (percentage of points presenting a gamma function value of <1) was obtained and compared. Calibration curves were obtained for each color channel within the dose range 0–16 Gy. Mean GPR values for film were> 98.9% for all criteria when normalizing per maximum dose. When using LD, normalization was> 92.7%. GPR values for the array were lower for all criteria; this difference being statistically significant when normalizing at LD, reaching 12% for the 3%/1.5 mm criterion. Conclusion: Both detectors provide satisfactory results for the QA of plans for VMAT lung SBRT. The film provided greater mean GPR values, afforded greater spatial resolution and was more efficient overall. |
topic |
Ion chamber array lung stereotactic body radiation therapy radiochromic film volumetric-modulated arc therapy |
url |
http://www.jmp.org.in/article.asp?issn=0971-6203;year=2017;volume=42;issue=3;spage=133;epage=139;aulast=Mata |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT juanfernandomatacolodro volumetricmodulatedarctherapylungstereotacticbodyradiationtherapydosimetricqualityassuranceacomparisonbetweenradiochromicfilmandchamberarray AT alfredosernaberna volumetricmodulatedarctherapylungstereotacticbodyradiationtherapydosimetricqualityassuranceacomparisonbetweenradiochromicfilmandchamberarray AT vicentepuchadespuchades volumetricmodulatedarctherapylungstereotacticbodyradiationtherapydosimetricqualityassuranceacomparisonbetweenradiochromicfilmandchamberarray AT davidramosamores volumetricmodulatedarctherapylungstereotacticbodyradiationtherapydosimetricqualityassuranceacomparisonbetweenradiochromicfilmandchamberarray AT miguelalcarazbanos volumetricmodulatedarctherapylungstereotacticbodyradiationtherapydosimetricqualityassuranceacomparisonbetweenradiochromicfilmandchamberarray |
_version_ |
1725527616184647680 |