Volumetric-modulated arc therapy lung stereotactic body radiation therapy dosimetric quality assurance: A comparison between radiochromic film and chamber array

Introduction: The aim of this work is to verify the use of radiochromic film in the quality assurance (QA) of volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) plans and compare the results with those obtained using an ion chamber array. Materials and Methods: Q...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Juan Fernando Mata Colodro, Alfredo Serna Berná, Vicente Puchades Puchades, David Ramos Amores, Miguel Alcaraz Baños
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2017-01-01
Series:Journal of Medical Physics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jmp.org.in/article.asp?issn=0971-6203;year=2017;volume=42;issue=3;spage=133;epage=139;aulast=Mata
id doaj-76d1e32c18814b4bab0316bff07ab48f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-76d1e32c18814b4bab0316bff07ab48f2020-11-24T23:34:47ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Medical Physics0971-62031998-39132017-01-0142313313910.4103/jmp.JMP_130_16Volumetric-modulated arc therapy lung stereotactic body radiation therapy dosimetric quality assurance: A comparison between radiochromic film and chamber arrayJuan Fernando Mata ColodroAlfredo Serna BernáVicente Puchades PuchadesDavid Ramos AmoresMiguel Alcaraz BañosIntroduction: The aim of this work is to verify the use of radiochromic film in the quality assurance (QA) of volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) plans and compare the results with those obtained using an ion chamber array. Materials and Methods: QA was performed for 14 plans using a two-dimensional-array seven29 and EBT3 film. Dose values per session ranged between 7.5 Gy and 18 Gy. The multichannel method was used to obtain a dose map for film. Results: The results obtained were compared with treatment planning system calculated profiles through gamma analysis. Passing criteria were 3%/3 mm, 2%/2 mm and 3%/1.5 mm with maximum and local dose (LD) normalization. Mean gamma passing rate (GPR) (percentage of points presenting a gamma function value of <1) was obtained and compared. Calibration curves were obtained for each color channel within the dose range 0–16 Gy. Mean GPR values for film were> 98.9% for all criteria when normalizing per maximum dose. When using LD, normalization was> 92.7%. GPR values for the array were lower for all criteria; this difference being statistically significant when normalizing at LD, reaching 12% for the 3%/1.5 mm criterion. Conclusion: Both detectors provide satisfactory results for the QA of plans for VMAT lung SBRT. The film provided greater mean GPR values, afforded greater spatial resolution and was more efficient overall.http://www.jmp.org.in/article.asp?issn=0971-6203;year=2017;volume=42;issue=3;spage=133;epage=139;aulast=MataIon chamber arraylung stereotactic body radiation therapyradiochromic filmvolumetric-modulated arc therapy
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Juan Fernando Mata Colodro
Alfredo Serna Berná
Vicente Puchades Puchades
David Ramos Amores
Miguel Alcaraz Baños
spellingShingle Juan Fernando Mata Colodro
Alfredo Serna Berná
Vicente Puchades Puchades
David Ramos Amores
Miguel Alcaraz Baños
Volumetric-modulated arc therapy lung stereotactic body radiation therapy dosimetric quality assurance: A comparison between radiochromic film and chamber array
Journal of Medical Physics
Ion chamber array
lung stereotactic body radiation therapy
radiochromic film
volumetric-modulated arc therapy
author_facet Juan Fernando Mata Colodro
Alfredo Serna Berná
Vicente Puchades Puchades
David Ramos Amores
Miguel Alcaraz Baños
author_sort Juan Fernando Mata Colodro
title Volumetric-modulated arc therapy lung stereotactic body radiation therapy dosimetric quality assurance: A comparison between radiochromic film and chamber array
title_short Volumetric-modulated arc therapy lung stereotactic body radiation therapy dosimetric quality assurance: A comparison between radiochromic film and chamber array
title_full Volumetric-modulated arc therapy lung stereotactic body radiation therapy dosimetric quality assurance: A comparison between radiochromic film and chamber array
title_fullStr Volumetric-modulated arc therapy lung stereotactic body radiation therapy dosimetric quality assurance: A comparison between radiochromic film and chamber array
title_full_unstemmed Volumetric-modulated arc therapy lung stereotactic body radiation therapy dosimetric quality assurance: A comparison between radiochromic film and chamber array
title_sort volumetric-modulated arc therapy lung stereotactic body radiation therapy dosimetric quality assurance: a comparison between radiochromic film and chamber array
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Journal of Medical Physics
issn 0971-6203
1998-3913
publishDate 2017-01-01
description Introduction: The aim of this work is to verify the use of radiochromic film in the quality assurance (QA) of volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) plans and compare the results with those obtained using an ion chamber array. Materials and Methods: QA was performed for 14 plans using a two-dimensional-array seven29 and EBT3 film. Dose values per session ranged between 7.5 Gy and 18 Gy. The multichannel method was used to obtain a dose map for film. Results: The results obtained were compared with treatment planning system calculated profiles through gamma analysis. Passing criteria were 3%/3 mm, 2%/2 mm and 3%/1.5 mm with maximum and local dose (LD) normalization. Mean gamma passing rate (GPR) (percentage of points presenting a gamma function value of <1) was obtained and compared. Calibration curves were obtained for each color channel within the dose range 0–16 Gy. Mean GPR values for film were> 98.9% for all criteria when normalizing per maximum dose. When using LD, normalization was> 92.7%. GPR values for the array were lower for all criteria; this difference being statistically significant when normalizing at LD, reaching 12% for the 3%/1.5 mm criterion. Conclusion: Both detectors provide satisfactory results for the QA of plans for VMAT lung SBRT. The film provided greater mean GPR values, afforded greater spatial resolution and was more efficient overall.
topic Ion chamber array
lung stereotactic body radiation therapy
radiochromic film
volumetric-modulated arc therapy
url http://www.jmp.org.in/article.asp?issn=0971-6203;year=2017;volume=42;issue=3;spage=133;epage=139;aulast=Mata
work_keys_str_mv AT juanfernandomatacolodro volumetricmodulatedarctherapylungstereotacticbodyradiationtherapydosimetricqualityassuranceacomparisonbetweenradiochromicfilmandchamberarray
AT alfredosernaberna volumetricmodulatedarctherapylungstereotacticbodyradiationtherapydosimetricqualityassuranceacomparisonbetweenradiochromicfilmandchamberarray
AT vicentepuchadespuchades volumetricmodulatedarctherapylungstereotacticbodyradiationtherapydosimetricqualityassuranceacomparisonbetweenradiochromicfilmandchamberarray
AT davidramosamores volumetricmodulatedarctherapylungstereotacticbodyradiationtherapydosimetricqualityassuranceacomparisonbetweenradiochromicfilmandchamberarray
AT miguelalcarazbanos volumetricmodulatedarctherapylungstereotacticbodyradiationtherapydosimetricqualityassuranceacomparisonbetweenradiochromicfilmandchamberarray
_version_ 1725527616184647680