5.5 MEASUREMENT OF ARTERIAL STIFFNESS BY ULTRAFAST ECHO: COMPARISON WITH ECHOTRACKING IN NORMOTENSIVE SUBJECTS AND HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS

Because measurement of arterial stiffness is highly dependent on blood pressure (BP), methods independent of BP are required. Ultrafast echography (UFE, Supersonic Imagine, Aix en Provence, France) makes use of very fast sampling rate (up to 10 kHz), so transient events such as pressure wave arrival...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Louise Marais*, Mathieu Pernot, Hakim Khettab, Mickael Tanter, Emmanuel Messas, Mustapha Zidi, Stéphane Laurent, Pierre Boutouyrie
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Atlantis Press 2015-11-01
Series:Artery Research
Online Access:https://www.atlantis-press.com/article/125930719/view
id doaj-76d65f4adc0b4a48a9ebc54f9a9571b0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-76d65f4adc0b4a48a9ebc54f9a9571b02020-11-25T01:27:45ZengAtlantis PressArtery Research 1876-44012015-11-011210.1016/j.artres.2015.10.0305.5 MEASUREMENT OF ARTERIAL STIFFNESS BY ULTRAFAST ECHO: COMPARISON WITH ECHOTRACKING IN NORMOTENSIVE SUBJECTS AND HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTSLouise Marais*Mathieu PernotHakim KhettabMickael TanterEmmanuel MessasMustapha ZidiStéphane LaurentPierre BoutouyrieBecause measurement of arterial stiffness is highly dependent on blood pressure (BP), methods independent of BP are required. Ultrafast echography (UFE, Supersonic Imagine, Aix en Provence, France) makes use of very fast sampling rate (up to 10 kHz), so transient events such as pressure wave arrival can be tracked. This method has never been tested against classical echotracking (Artlab, Esaote, Maastricht, NL) and carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cf-PWV, Sphygmocor, AtCor, Sydney, Australia). We included 56 subjects, 27 normotensives (NT) and 29 essential hypertensives (HT), matched for age and sex. We optimized UFE algorithms for pressure wave detection and tracking, for both foot of the wave (FW) and dicrotic notch (DN) PWV. Feasibility appears good (FW: 78%, DN: 96%). The relations of arterial stiffness with age and blood pressure were stronger for echotracking and cf-PWV than for UFE. DN wave fronts appeared better associated with cf-PWV (r = 0.32, p < 0.001) and carotid PWV (r = 0.47, p < 0.001). FW was not associated with cf-PWV nor with carotid PWV. The residuals between DN and carotid PWV were not associated with BP or age. Similar associations between DN and cf-PWV/carotid PWV were found in NT and HT. Conclusion: After optimizing algorithms for wave front identification and tracking, UFE appears as a promising technique for assessing arterial stiffness. DN showed the best associations with echotracking, whereas FW did not provide meaningful data. As previously shown by Hermeling et al (J Hypertens 2008 and 2009), FW is not appropriate for local stiffness measurement likely because of very early wave reflections.https://www.atlantis-press.com/article/125930719/view
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Louise Marais*
Mathieu Pernot
Hakim Khettab
Mickael Tanter
Emmanuel Messas
Mustapha Zidi
Stéphane Laurent
Pierre Boutouyrie
spellingShingle Louise Marais*
Mathieu Pernot
Hakim Khettab
Mickael Tanter
Emmanuel Messas
Mustapha Zidi
Stéphane Laurent
Pierre Boutouyrie
5.5 MEASUREMENT OF ARTERIAL STIFFNESS BY ULTRAFAST ECHO: COMPARISON WITH ECHOTRACKING IN NORMOTENSIVE SUBJECTS AND HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS
Artery Research
author_facet Louise Marais*
Mathieu Pernot
Hakim Khettab
Mickael Tanter
Emmanuel Messas
Mustapha Zidi
Stéphane Laurent
Pierre Boutouyrie
author_sort Louise Marais*
title 5.5 MEASUREMENT OF ARTERIAL STIFFNESS BY ULTRAFAST ECHO: COMPARISON WITH ECHOTRACKING IN NORMOTENSIVE SUBJECTS AND HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS
title_short 5.5 MEASUREMENT OF ARTERIAL STIFFNESS BY ULTRAFAST ECHO: COMPARISON WITH ECHOTRACKING IN NORMOTENSIVE SUBJECTS AND HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS
title_full 5.5 MEASUREMENT OF ARTERIAL STIFFNESS BY ULTRAFAST ECHO: COMPARISON WITH ECHOTRACKING IN NORMOTENSIVE SUBJECTS AND HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS
title_fullStr 5.5 MEASUREMENT OF ARTERIAL STIFFNESS BY ULTRAFAST ECHO: COMPARISON WITH ECHOTRACKING IN NORMOTENSIVE SUBJECTS AND HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS
title_full_unstemmed 5.5 MEASUREMENT OF ARTERIAL STIFFNESS BY ULTRAFAST ECHO: COMPARISON WITH ECHOTRACKING IN NORMOTENSIVE SUBJECTS AND HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS
title_sort 5.5 measurement of arterial stiffness by ultrafast echo: comparison with echotracking in normotensive subjects and hypertensive patients
publisher Atlantis Press
series Artery Research
issn 1876-4401
publishDate 2015-11-01
description Because measurement of arterial stiffness is highly dependent on blood pressure (BP), methods independent of BP are required. Ultrafast echography (UFE, Supersonic Imagine, Aix en Provence, France) makes use of very fast sampling rate (up to 10 kHz), so transient events such as pressure wave arrival can be tracked. This method has never been tested against classical echotracking (Artlab, Esaote, Maastricht, NL) and carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cf-PWV, Sphygmocor, AtCor, Sydney, Australia). We included 56 subjects, 27 normotensives (NT) and 29 essential hypertensives (HT), matched for age and sex. We optimized UFE algorithms for pressure wave detection and tracking, for both foot of the wave (FW) and dicrotic notch (DN) PWV. Feasibility appears good (FW: 78%, DN: 96%). The relations of arterial stiffness with age and blood pressure were stronger for echotracking and cf-PWV than for UFE. DN wave fronts appeared better associated with cf-PWV (r = 0.32, p < 0.001) and carotid PWV (r = 0.47, p < 0.001). FW was not associated with cf-PWV nor with carotid PWV. The residuals between DN and carotid PWV were not associated with BP or age. Similar associations between DN and cf-PWV/carotid PWV were found in NT and HT. Conclusion: After optimizing algorithms for wave front identification and tracking, UFE appears as a promising technique for assessing arterial stiffness. DN showed the best associations with echotracking, whereas FW did not provide meaningful data. As previously shown by Hermeling et al (J Hypertens 2008 and 2009), FW is not appropriate for local stiffness measurement likely because of very early wave reflections.
url https://www.atlantis-press.com/article/125930719/view
work_keys_str_mv AT louisemarais 55measurementofarterialstiffnessbyultrafastechocomparisonwithechotrackinginnormotensivesubjectsandhypertensivepatients
AT mathieupernot 55measurementofarterialstiffnessbyultrafastechocomparisonwithechotrackinginnormotensivesubjectsandhypertensivepatients
AT hakimkhettab 55measurementofarterialstiffnessbyultrafastechocomparisonwithechotrackinginnormotensivesubjectsandhypertensivepatients
AT mickaeltanter 55measurementofarterialstiffnessbyultrafastechocomparisonwithechotrackinginnormotensivesubjectsandhypertensivepatients
AT emmanuelmessas 55measurementofarterialstiffnessbyultrafastechocomparisonwithechotrackinginnormotensivesubjectsandhypertensivepatients
AT mustaphazidi 55measurementofarterialstiffnessbyultrafastechocomparisonwithechotrackinginnormotensivesubjectsandhypertensivepatients
AT stephanelaurent 55measurementofarterialstiffnessbyultrafastechocomparisonwithechotrackinginnormotensivesubjectsandhypertensivepatients
AT pierreboutouyrie 55measurementofarterialstiffnessbyultrafastechocomparisonwithechotrackinginnormotensivesubjectsandhypertensivepatients
_version_ 1725103482802798592