The institutionalization of Jesus' charismatic authority, Part 1: Indirect Christology - direct Christology<Sup>1<Sup>

This study concerns an investigation of the evolution of the Jesus tradition. Christological titles are studied in terms of the social theory of the institutionalization of charismatic authority. It makes use of Anthony Thiselton's and Bengt Holmberg's application of Max Weber's socia...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yolanda Dreyer, Andries van Aarde
Format: Article
Language:Afrikaans
Published: AOSIS 2000-12-01
Series:HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies
Online Access:https://hts.org.za/index.php/hts/article/view/1765
id doaj-774613774b39482986a5479371541b7b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-774613774b39482986a5479371541b7b2020-11-24T22:47:17ZafrAOSISHTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies 0259-94222072-80502000-12-01562/369772210.4102/hts.v56i2/3.17651509The institutionalization of Jesus' charismatic authority, Part 1: Indirect Christology - direct Christology<Sup>1<Sup>Yolanda Dreyer0Andries van Aarde1Department of New Testament, Faculty of Theology, University of PretoriaDepartment of New Testament, Faculty of Theology, University of PretoriaThis study concerns an investigation of the evolution of the Jesus tradition. Christological titles are studied in terms of the social theory of the institutionalization of charismatic authority. It makes use of Anthony Thiselton's and Bengt Holmberg's application of Max Weber's social theory. It is argued that the followers of Jesus acknowledged and expressed his authority by means of naming. These "names" developed into "titles" when the post-Easter followers of Jesus allocated power to him. The process of the institutionalization of Jesus' charismatic authority relates to the transmission from the oral tradition of Jesus' sayings and deeds to the written evidence. The article emphasizes the work done by the Jesus Seminar. The following "rules of written evidence" are considered: clustering and contexting; revision and commentary; false attribution; difficult sayings and the process of christianising. In Part 2 of the study, Weber,s social theory is applied to the Christological title "Son of Man".https://hts.org.za/index.php/hts/article/view/1765
collection DOAJ
language Afrikaans
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yolanda Dreyer
Andries van Aarde
spellingShingle Yolanda Dreyer
Andries van Aarde
The institutionalization of Jesus' charismatic authority, Part 1: Indirect Christology - direct Christology<Sup>1<Sup>
HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies
author_facet Yolanda Dreyer
Andries van Aarde
author_sort Yolanda Dreyer
title The institutionalization of Jesus' charismatic authority, Part 1: Indirect Christology - direct Christology<Sup>1<Sup>
title_short The institutionalization of Jesus' charismatic authority, Part 1: Indirect Christology - direct Christology<Sup>1<Sup>
title_full The institutionalization of Jesus' charismatic authority, Part 1: Indirect Christology - direct Christology<Sup>1<Sup>
title_fullStr The institutionalization of Jesus' charismatic authority, Part 1: Indirect Christology - direct Christology<Sup>1<Sup>
title_full_unstemmed The institutionalization of Jesus' charismatic authority, Part 1: Indirect Christology - direct Christology<Sup>1<Sup>
title_sort institutionalization of jesus' charismatic authority, part 1: indirect christology - direct christology<sup>1<sup>
publisher AOSIS
series HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies
issn 0259-9422
2072-8050
publishDate 2000-12-01
description This study concerns an investigation of the evolution of the Jesus tradition. Christological titles are studied in terms of the social theory of the institutionalization of charismatic authority. It makes use of Anthony Thiselton's and Bengt Holmberg's application of Max Weber's social theory. It is argued that the followers of Jesus acknowledged and expressed his authority by means of naming. These "names" developed into "titles" when the post-Easter followers of Jesus allocated power to him. The process of the institutionalization of Jesus' charismatic authority relates to the transmission from the oral tradition of Jesus' sayings and deeds to the written evidence. The article emphasizes the work done by the Jesus Seminar. The following "rules of written evidence" are considered: clustering and contexting; revision and commentary; false attribution; difficult sayings and the process of christianising. In Part 2 of the study, Weber,s social theory is applied to the Christological title "Son of Man".
url https://hts.org.za/index.php/hts/article/view/1765
work_keys_str_mv AT yolandadreyer theinstitutionalizationofjesuscharismaticauthoritypart1indirectchristologydirectchristologysup1sup
AT andriesvanaarde theinstitutionalizationofjesuscharismaticauthoritypart1indirectchristologydirectchristologysup1sup
AT yolandadreyer institutionalizationofjesuscharismaticauthoritypart1indirectchristologydirectchristologysup1sup
AT andriesvanaarde institutionalizationofjesuscharismaticauthoritypart1indirectchristologydirectchristologysup1sup
_version_ 1725682150446989312