Exploring Congruence between Habermasian Philosophy, Mixed-Method Research, and Managing Data Using NVivo

Remaining faithful to the conceptual underpinnings of philosophy, methodological approach, and language can present researchers with dilemmas when a researcher exercises the freedom to choose mixed-method approaches to make meaning from inquiry. In this article, the author explores one approach to m...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Robyn Smyth
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2006-06-01
Series:International Journal of Qualitative Methods
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500204
id doaj-776f7f0a7ca24c92893d7e5b1cf4abdc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-776f7f0a7ca24c92893d7e5b1cf4abdc2020-11-25T03:24:02ZengSAGE PublishingInternational Journal of Qualitative Methods1609-40692006-06-01510.1177/16094069060050020410.1177_160940690600500204Exploring Congruence between Habermasian Philosophy, Mixed-Method Research, and Managing Data Using NVivoRobyn SmythRemaining faithful to the conceptual underpinnings of philosophy, methodological approach, and language can present researchers with dilemmas when a researcher exercises the freedom to choose mixed-method approaches to make meaning from inquiry. In this article, the author explores one approach to maintaining consistency while deriving outcomes that are trustworthy and have authenticity. She demonstrates how a researcher can remain grounded in the world of the research subject and thereby maintain authenticity and transferability. The discussion of computer-aided data management by programs such as NVivo illustrates how these tools can be usefully employed in constructivist methods to assist the researcher with the extensive bulk of qualitative research data.https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500204
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Robyn Smyth
spellingShingle Robyn Smyth
Exploring Congruence between Habermasian Philosophy, Mixed-Method Research, and Managing Data Using NVivo
International Journal of Qualitative Methods
author_facet Robyn Smyth
author_sort Robyn Smyth
title Exploring Congruence between Habermasian Philosophy, Mixed-Method Research, and Managing Data Using NVivo
title_short Exploring Congruence between Habermasian Philosophy, Mixed-Method Research, and Managing Data Using NVivo
title_full Exploring Congruence between Habermasian Philosophy, Mixed-Method Research, and Managing Data Using NVivo
title_fullStr Exploring Congruence between Habermasian Philosophy, Mixed-Method Research, and Managing Data Using NVivo
title_full_unstemmed Exploring Congruence between Habermasian Philosophy, Mixed-Method Research, and Managing Data Using NVivo
title_sort exploring congruence between habermasian philosophy, mixed-method research, and managing data using nvivo
publisher SAGE Publishing
series International Journal of Qualitative Methods
issn 1609-4069
publishDate 2006-06-01
description Remaining faithful to the conceptual underpinnings of philosophy, methodological approach, and language can present researchers with dilemmas when a researcher exercises the freedom to choose mixed-method approaches to make meaning from inquiry. In this article, the author explores one approach to maintaining consistency while deriving outcomes that are trustworthy and have authenticity. She demonstrates how a researcher can remain grounded in the world of the research subject and thereby maintain authenticity and transferability. The discussion of computer-aided data management by programs such as NVivo illustrates how these tools can be usefully employed in constructivist methods to assist the researcher with the extensive bulk of qualitative research data.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500204
work_keys_str_mv AT robynsmyth exploringcongruencebetweenhabermasianphilosophymixedmethodresearchandmanagingdatausingnvivo
_version_ 1724603846917881856