Identifying major policy challenges and policy interventions via expert methods
This paper presents the application of expert decision methods for the formulation and prioritization of the long-term economic, social and environmental policies in the Slovak Republic. The Partnership Agreement for the Slovak Republic (PA) is an underlying strategy for investments from the Europea...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Sciendo
2020-09-01
|
Series: | Review of Economic Perspectives |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.2478/revecp-2020-0017 |
id |
doaj-77cc94f9f5dd421d9a6b4adf81ba4278 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-77cc94f9f5dd421d9a6b4adf81ba42782021-09-05T14:01:22ZengSciendoReview of Economic Perspectives 1804-16632020-09-0120336137710.2478/revecp-2020-0017revecp-2020-0017Identifying major policy challenges and policy interventions via expert methodsDokupilová Dušana0Baláž Vladimír1Kurincová Vladimíra Čavojová2Mikušková Eva Ballová3Gombitová Dagmar4Institute for Forecasting, Centre of Social and Psychological Sciences, Slovak Academy of Sciences,Bratislava, Slovak RepublicInstitute for Forecasting, Centre of Social and Psychological Sciences, Slovak Academy of Sciences,Šancová 56, 813 64Bratislava, Slovak RepublicInstitute of Experimental Psychology, Centre of Social and Psychological Sciences, Slovak Academy of Sciences,Bratislava, Slovak RepublicInstitute of Experimental Psychology, Centre of Social and Psychological Sciences, Slovak Academy of Sciences,Bratislava, Slovak RepublicInstitute for Forecasting, Centre of Social and Psychological Sciences, Slovak Academy of Sciences,Bratislava, Slovak RepublicThis paper presents the application of expert decision methods for the formulation and prioritization of the long-term economic, social and environmental policies in the Slovak Republic. The Partnership Agreement for the Slovak Republic (PA) is an underlying strategy for investments from the European Structural and Investment Funds (ESIF) in the period 2021-2027. Policies implemented under the PA will allocate €13.4b on four policy objectives. This paper concentrates on the policy objective 4 ‘Social development’. The authors co-operated with the Deputy Prime Minister Office and assembled panels of top Slovak experts on social and economic issues. The Delphi and Analytical hierarchy process (AHP) methods were combined for analyzing major development challenges and eliciting policy priorities. The methods combined the bottom-up and top-down approaches to policy making. Nine potential policy measures in three policy areas emerged from the Delphi exercise. The AHP exercise applied three criteria (relevance, urgency and feasibility) to rank the abovementioned measures within three policy areas. As for the Policy Area 1 (Labour market, employment, training and institutions) the measure 4.1.1 ‘Improving access to employment and modernizing institutions and services on labour market’ clearly dominated over the measure 4.1.2 ‘Supporting a better work-life balance’. The measure 4.2.2 ‘Equal access to quality and inclusive education’ emerged substantially more important than measures 4.2.1 ‘Improving the quality and effectiveness of education and training systems’ and 4.2.3 ‘Support to life-long learning’ in the Policy Area 2 ‘Education and skills’. Finally, measures 4.3.2 ‘Supporting social and economic integration of marginalized Roma communities’ and 4.3.3 ‘Ensuring equal access to healthcare including primary care’ received the highest ranks in the Policy Area 3 ‘Health and social services’.https://doi.org/10.2478/revecp-2020-0017delphi methodanalytical hierarchy processpartnership agreementlong-term planningd78d70 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Dokupilová Dušana Baláž Vladimír Kurincová Vladimíra Čavojová Mikušková Eva Ballová Gombitová Dagmar |
spellingShingle |
Dokupilová Dušana Baláž Vladimír Kurincová Vladimíra Čavojová Mikušková Eva Ballová Gombitová Dagmar Identifying major policy challenges and policy interventions via expert methods Review of Economic Perspectives delphi method analytical hierarchy process partnership agreement long-term planning d78 d70 |
author_facet |
Dokupilová Dušana Baláž Vladimír Kurincová Vladimíra Čavojová Mikušková Eva Ballová Gombitová Dagmar |
author_sort |
Dokupilová Dušana |
title |
Identifying major policy challenges and policy interventions via expert methods |
title_short |
Identifying major policy challenges and policy interventions via expert methods |
title_full |
Identifying major policy challenges and policy interventions via expert methods |
title_fullStr |
Identifying major policy challenges and policy interventions via expert methods |
title_full_unstemmed |
Identifying major policy challenges and policy interventions via expert methods |
title_sort |
identifying major policy challenges and policy interventions via expert methods |
publisher |
Sciendo |
series |
Review of Economic Perspectives |
issn |
1804-1663 |
publishDate |
2020-09-01 |
description |
This paper presents the application of expert decision methods for the formulation and prioritization of the long-term economic, social and environmental policies in the Slovak Republic. The Partnership Agreement for the Slovak Republic (PA) is an underlying strategy for investments from the European Structural and Investment Funds (ESIF) in the period 2021-2027. Policies implemented under the PA will allocate €13.4b on four policy objectives. This paper concentrates on the policy objective 4 ‘Social development’. The authors co-operated with the Deputy Prime Minister Office and assembled panels of top Slovak experts on social and economic issues. The Delphi and Analytical hierarchy process (AHP) methods were combined for analyzing major development challenges and eliciting policy priorities. The methods combined the bottom-up and top-down approaches to policy making. Nine potential policy measures in three policy areas emerged from the Delphi exercise. The AHP exercise applied three criteria (relevance, urgency and feasibility) to rank the abovementioned measures within three policy areas. As for the Policy Area 1 (Labour market, employment, training and institutions) the measure 4.1.1 ‘Improving access to employment and modernizing institutions and services on labour market’ clearly dominated over the measure 4.1.2 ‘Supporting a better work-life balance’. The measure 4.2.2 ‘Equal access to quality and inclusive education’ emerged substantially more important than measures 4.2.1 ‘Improving the quality and effectiveness of education and training systems’ and 4.2.3 ‘Support to life-long learning’ in the Policy Area 2 ‘Education and skills’. Finally, measures 4.3.2 ‘Supporting social and economic integration of marginalized Roma communities’ and 4.3.3 ‘Ensuring equal access to healthcare including primary care’ received the highest ranks in the Policy Area 3 ‘Health and social services’. |
topic |
delphi method analytical hierarchy process partnership agreement long-term planning d78 d70 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.2478/revecp-2020-0017 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT dokupilovadusana identifyingmajorpolicychallengesandpolicyinterventionsviaexpertmethods AT balazvladimir identifyingmajorpolicychallengesandpolicyinterventionsviaexpertmethods AT kurincovavladimiracavojova identifyingmajorpolicychallengesandpolicyinterventionsviaexpertmethods AT mikuskovaevaballova identifyingmajorpolicychallengesandpolicyinterventionsviaexpertmethods AT gombitovadagmar identifyingmajorpolicychallengesandpolicyinterventionsviaexpertmethods |
_version_ |
1717810251248435200 |