Green behavioral (in)consistencies: are pro-environmental behaviors in different domains substitutes or complements?

Households’ consumption patterns and behaviors have profound influence on natural resources and environmental quality. This paper explores whether environmental behaviors and willingness to pay (WTP) in the household domains transport, energy consumption and water consumption are substitutes or comp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sandra Schusser, Goran Bostedt
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: LLC "CPC "Business Perspectives" 2019-06-01
Series:Environmental Economics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://businessperspectives.org/images/pdf/applications/publishing/templates/article/assets/12133/EE_2019_01_Schusser.pdf
id doaj-77e4dda5987d4a4685f7b4f82e3c7469
record_format Article
spelling doaj-77e4dda5987d4a4685f7b4f82e3c74692020-11-25T03:24:49ZengLLC "CPC "Business Perspectives"Environmental Economics1998-60411998-605X2019-06-01101234710.21511/ee.10(1).2019.0312133Green behavioral (in)consistencies: are pro-environmental behaviors in different domains substitutes or complements?Sandra Schusser0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6204-6384Goran Bostedt1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6540-743XPh.D. candidate, Centre for Environmental and Resource Economics (CERE), Department of Forest Economics, Swedish University of Agricultural SciencesAssociate Professor, Centre for Environmental and Resource Economics (CERE), Department of Forest Economics, SLU/Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences; Umea School of Business and Economics, Umea UniversityHouseholds’ consumption patterns and behaviors have profound influence on natural resources and environmental quality. This paper explores whether environmental behaviors and willingness to pay (WTP) in the household domains transport, energy consumption and water consumption are substitutes or complements. Using a cross-country data set from the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development Survey on Environmental Attitudes and Behavior from 2008, a random-effects (ordered) probit model is used to answer this question for the following countries: Australia, Canada, France, Mexico, Italy, and South Korea. It is found that in most countries, actual environmental behaviors are substitutes, while WTP for environmental public goods in different domains is mostly complementary. Grounding in these results, policies aiming to encourage overall environmentally friendly lifestyles should therefore be all-encompassing of several public domains, instead of individual ones, to avoid the risk of negative spillovers.https://businessperspectives.org/images/pdf/applications/publishing/templates/article/assets/12133/EE_2019_01_Schusser.pdfwillingness to paypro-environmental behaviorprivate provision of public goodsimpure public goodsrenewable energy
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sandra Schusser
Goran Bostedt
spellingShingle Sandra Schusser
Goran Bostedt
Green behavioral (in)consistencies: are pro-environmental behaviors in different domains substitutes or complements?
Environmental Economics
willingness to pay
pro-environmental behavior
private provision of public goods
impure public goods
renewable energy
author_facet Sandra Schusser
Goran Bostedt
author_sort Sandra Schusser
title Green behavioral (in)consistencies: are pro-environmental behaviors in different domains substitutes or complements?
title_short Green behavioral (in)consistencies: are pro-environmental behaviors in different domains substitutes or complements?
title_full Green behavioral (in)consistencies: are pro-environmental behaviors in different domains substitutes or complements?
title_fullStr Green behavioral (in)consistencies: are pro-environmental behaviors in different domains substitutes or complements?
title_full_unstemmed Green behavioral (in)consistencies: are pro-environmental behaviors in different domains substitutes or complements?
title_sort green behavioral (in)consistencies: are pro-environmental behaviors in different domains substitutes or complements?
publisher LLC "CPC "Business Perspectives"
series Environmental Economics
issn 1998-6041
1998-605X
publishDate 2019-06-01
description Households’ consumption patterns and behaviors have profound influence on natural resources and environmental quality. This paper explores whether environmental behaviors and willingness to pay (WTP) in the household domains transport, energy consumption and water consumption are substitutes or complements. Using a cross-country data set from the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development Survey on Environmental Attitudes and Behavior from 2008, a random-effects (ordered) probit model is used to answer this question for the following countries: Australia, Canada, France, Mexico, Italy, and South Korea. It is found that in most countries, actual environmental behaviors are substitutes, while WTP for environmental public goods in different domains is mostly complementary. Grounding in these results, policies aiming to encourage overall environmentally friendly lifestyles should therefore be all-encompassing of several public domains, instead of individual ones, to avoid the risk of negative spillovers.
topic willingness to pay
pro-environmental behavior
private provision of public goods
impure public goods
renewable energy
url https://businessperspectives.org/images/pdf/applications/publishing/templates/article/assets/12133/EE_2019_01_Schusser.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT sandraschusser greenbehavioralinconsistenciesareproenvironmentalbehaviorsindifferentdomainssubstitutesorcomplements
AT goranbostedt greenbehavioralinconsistenciesareproenvironmentalbehaviorsindifferentdomainssubstitutesorcomplements
_version_ 1724599663772827648