Herbal hepatotoxicity and WHO global introspection method

Herbal hepatotoxicity is a rare but highly disputed disease because numerous confounding variables may complicate accurate causality assessment. Case evaluation is even more difficult when the WHO global introspection method (WHO method) is applied as diagnostic algorithm. This method lacks liver sp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rolf Teschke, M.D., Axel Eickhoff, Albrecht Wolff, Christian Frenzel, Johannes Schulze
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2013-01-01
Series:Annals of Hepatology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1665268119313808
id doaj-78009f6b683944c689141f2dc460f107
record_format Article
spelling doaj-78009f6b683944c689141f2dc460f1072021-06-09T05:54:24ZengElsevierAnnals of Hepatology1665-26812013-01-011211121Herbal hepatotoxicity and WHO global introspection methodRolf Teschke, M.D.0Axel Eickhoff1Albrecht Wolff2Christian Frenzel3Johannes Schulze4Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Klinikum Hanau, Academic Teaching Hospital of the Medical Faculty of the Goethe University Frankfurt, Main, Germany; Corresponding author.Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Klinikum Hanau, Academic Teaching Hospital of the Medical Faculty of the Goethe University Frankfurt, Main, GermanyDepartment of Internal Medicine II, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, GermanyDepartment of Medicine I, University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, GermanyOffice of the Dean, Medical Faculty of the Goethe University Frankfurt/Main, Germany.Herbal hepatotoxicity is a rare but highly disputed disease because numerous confounding variables may complicate accurate causality assessment. Case evaluation is even more difficult when the WHO global introspection method (WHO method) is applied as diagnostic algorithm. This method lacks liver specificity, hepatotoxicity validation, and quantitative items, basic qualifications required for a sound evaluation of hepatotoxicity cases. Consequently, there are no data available for reliability, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value. Its scope is also limited by the fact that it cannot discriminate between a positive and a negative causality attribution, thereby stimulating case overdiagnosing and overreporting. The WHO method ignores uncertainties regarding daily dose, temporal association, start, duration, and end of herbal use, time to onset of the adverse reaction, and course of liver values after herb discontinuation. Insufficiently considered or ignored are comedications, preexisting liver diseases, alternative explanations upon clinical assessment, and exclusion of infections by hepatitis A-C, cytomegalovirus (CMV), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), herpes simplex virus (HSV), and varicella zoster virus (VZV). We clearly prefer as alternative the scale of CIOMS (Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences) which is structured, quantitative, liver specific, and validated for hepatotoxicity. In conclusion, causality of herbal hepatotoxicity is best assessed by the liver specific CIOMS scale validated for hepatotoxicity rather than the obsolete WHO method that is liver unspecific and not validated for hepatotoxicity. CIOMS based assessments will ensure the correct diagnosis and exclude alternative diagnosis that may require other specific therapies.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1665268119313808Herb induced liver injuryCIOMSKavaPelargonium sidoidesHerbalife products
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rolf Teschke, M.D.
Axel Eickhoff
Albrecht Wolff
Christian Frenzel
Johannes Schulze
spellingShingle Rolf Teschke, M.D.
Axel Eickhoff
Albrecht Wolff
Christian Frenzel
Johannes Schulze
Herbal hepatotoxicity and WHO global introspection method
Annals of Hepatology
Herb induced liver injury
CIOMS
Kava
Pelargonium sidoides
Herbalife products
author_facet Rolf Teschke, M.D.
Axel Eickhoff
Albrecht Wolff
Christian Frenzel
Johannes Schulze
author_sort Rolf Teschke, M.D.
title Herbal hepatotoxicity and WHO global introspection method
title_short Herbal hepatotoxicity and WHO global introspection method
title_full Herbal hepatotoxicity and WHO global introspection method
title_fullStr Herbal hepatotoxicity and WHO global introspection method
title_full_unstemmed Herbal hepatotoxicity and WHO global introspection method
title_sort herbal hepatotoxicity and who global introspection method
publisher Elsevier
series Annals of Hepatology
issn 1665-2681
publishDate 2013-01-01
description Herbal hepatotoxicity is a rare but highly disputed disease because numerous confounding variables may complicate accurate causality assessment. Case evaluation is even more difficult when the WHO global introspection method (WHO method) is applied as diagnostic algorithm. This method lacks liver specificity, hepatotoxicity validation, and quantitative items, basic qualifications required for a sound evaluation of hepatotoxicity cases. Consequently, there are no data available for reliability, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value. Its scope is also limited by the fact that it cannot discriminate between a positive and a negative causality attribution, thereby stimulating case overdiagnosing and overreporting. The WHO method ignores uncertainties regarding daily dose, temporal association, start, duration, and end of herbal use, time to onset of the adverse reaction, and course of liver values after herb discontinuation. Insufficiently considered or ignored are comedications, preexisting liver diseases, alternative explanations upon clinical assessment, and exclusion of infections by hepatitis A-C, cytomegalovirus (CMV), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), herpes simplex virus (HSV), and varicella zoster virus (VZV). We clearly prefer as alternative the scale of CIOMS (Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences) which is structured, quantitative, liver specific, and validated for hepatotoxicity. In conclusion, causality of herbal hepatotoxicity is best assessed by the liver specific CIOMS scale validated for hepatotoxicity rather than the obsolete WHO method that is liver unspecific and not validated for hepatotoxicity. CIOMS based assessments will ensure the correct diagnosis and exclude alternative diagnosis that may require other specific therapies.
topic Herb induced liver injury
CIOMS
Kava
Pelargonium sidoides
Herbalife products
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1665268119313808
work_keys_str_mv AT rolfteschkemd herbalhepatotoxicityandwhoglobalintrospectionmethod
AT axeleickhoff herbalhepatotoxicityandwhoglobalintrospectionmethod
AT albrechtwolff herbalhepatotoxicityandwhoglobalintrospectionmethod
AT christianfrenzel herbalhepatotoxicityandwhoglobalintrospectionmethod
AT johannesschulze herbalhepatotoxicityandwhoglobalintrospectionmethod
_version_ 1721388718798929920