Regulation of freshwater use to restore ecosystems resilience

Concern about the impacts of water regulation upon the aquatic environment has led to increasingly stringent regulatory constraints on the quantity and timing of freshwater withdrawals. For the time being these regulatory constraints tend to be articulated in terms of limits upon withdrawals, partly...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: A. Murgatroyd, J.W. Hall
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021-01-01
Series:Climate Risk Management
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212096321000322
id doaj-7811942606a3452c8bd22127863e8509
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7811942606a3452c8bd22127863e85092021-05-22T04:37:02ZengElsevierClimate Risk Management2212-09632021-01-0132100303Regulation of freshwater use to restore ecosystems resilienceA. Murgatroyd0J.W. Hall1Corresponding author.; Environmental Change Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UKEnvironmental Change Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UKConcern about the impacts of water regulation upon the aquatic environment has led to increasingly stringent regulatory constraints on the quantity and timing of freshwater withdrawals. For the time being these regulatory constraints tend to be articulated in terms of limits upon withdrawals, partly because of limited knowledge of the condition and resilience of the aquatic ecosystems. A more sophisticated approach to regulation would be more directly related to indicators of ecological condition. Moreover, it would consider ecosystem response to climatic events not present in the historical record. In this paper we use a combination of empirical evidence of ecosystem condition with simulation to propose and test reductions to regulatory limits on river water withdrawals and downstream minimum flow requirements. The study uses multi-level linear regression to relate the Lotic-invertebrate Index for Flow Evaluation (LIFE) to antecedent flow statistics observed in the Lee catchment, England. The selected flow statistics included extreme low (Q90) and high (Q10) flows in the summer season (April-Sept), and the median flows observed in the winter season (Oct-Mar). The derived model is used to forecast the response of the macroinvertebrate index to future flow scenarios and demand forecasts, incorporating the uncertainties in ecosystem response. Simulation is used to evaluate the sensitivity of the indices to different regulatory limits. Results indicate that macroinvertebrate health will worsen under 21st Century climate conditions, and that the existing regulation policy must be modified to maintain historically observed LIFE scores into the future. The framework demonstrates how regulations could move from precautionary limits on withdrawals to an approach based on observations, forecasting and simulation, allowing planners to refine the trade-offs between river health and reliable water supply in the face of uncertainty.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212096321000322River healthWater planningWater managementClimate changeResilience
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author A. Murgatroyd
J.W. Hall
spellingShingle A. Murgatroyd
J.W. Hall
Regulation of freshwater use to restore ecosystems resilience
Climate Risk Management
River health
Water planning
Water management
Climate change
Resilience
author_facet A. Murgatroyd
J.W. Hall
author_sort A. Murgatroyd
title Regulation of freshwater use to restore ecosystems resilience
title_short Regulation of freshwater use to restore ecosystems resilience
title_full Regulation of freshwater use to restore ecosystems resilience
title_fullStr Regulation of freshwater use to restore ecosystems resilience
title_full_unstemmed Regulation of freshwater use to restore ecosystems resilience
title_sort regulation of freshwater use to restore ecosystems resilience
publisher Elsevier
series Climate Risk Management
issn 2212-0963
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Concern about the impacts of water regulation upon the aquatic environment has led to increasingly stringent regulatory constraints on the quantity and timing of freshwater withdrawals. For the time being these regulatory constraints tend to be articulated in terms of limits upon withdrawals, partly because of limited knowledge of the condition and resilience of the aquatic ecosystems. A more sophisticated approach to regulation would be more directly related to indicators of ecological condition. Moreover, it would consider ecosystem response to climatic events not present in the historical record. In this paper we use a combination of empirical evidence of ecosystem condition with simulation to propose and test reductions to regulatory limits on river water withdrawals and downstream minimum flow requirements. The study uses multi-level linear regression to relate the Lotic-invertebrate Index for Flow Evaluation (LIFE) to antecedent flow statistics observed in the Lee catchment, England. The selected flow statistics included extreme low (Q90) and high (Q10) flows in the summer season (April-Sept), and the median flows observed in the winter season (Oct-Mar). The derived model is used to forecast the response of the macroinvertebrate index to future flow scenarios and demand forecasts, incorporating the uncertainties in ecosystem response. Simulation is used to evaluate the sensitivity of the indices to different regulatory limits. Results indicate that macroinvertebrate health will worsen under 21st Century climate conditions, and that the existing regulation policy must be modified to maintain historically observed LIFE scores into the future. The framework demonstrates how regulations could move from precautionary limits on withdrawals to an approach based on observations, forecasting and simulation, allowing planners to refine the trade-offs between river health and reliable water supply in the face of uncertainty.
topic River health
Water planning
Water management
Climate change
Resilience
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212096321000322
work_keys_str_mv AT amurgatroyd regulationoffreshwaterusetorestoreecosystemsresilience
AT jwhall regulationoffreshwaterusetorestoreecosystemsresilience
_version_ 1721430768146710528