Treatment of scoliosis in osteogenesis imperfecta: Experience at a single institution

Background: Spinal deformities are frequently seen in osteogenesis imperfecta (OI). We investigated contemporary spinal fusion techniques including pedicle screw fixation with or without cement augmentation in OI patients with scoliosis. Materials and Methods: OI patients with posterior-only scolios...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mutlu Cobanoglu, Jennifer M Bauer, Geraldine Neiss, Petya Yorgova, Kenneth Rogers, Richard W Kruse, Suken A Shah
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2019-01-01
Series:Indian Spine Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.isjonline.com/article.asp?issn=2589-5079;year=2019;volume=2;issue=2;spage=114;epage=121;aulast=Cobanoglu
id doaj-782076fd0d0449838e44a4ac6990da12
record_format Article
spelling doaj-782076fd0d0449838e44a4ac6990da122021-06-02T07:29:04ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Spine Journal2589-50792589-50872019-01-012211412110.4103/isj.isj_36_18Treatment of scoliosis in osteogenesis imperfecta: Experience at a single institutionMutlu CobanogluJennifer M BauerGeraldine NeissPetya YorgovaKenneth RogersRichard W KruseSuken A ShahBackground: Spinal deformities are frequently seen in osteogenesis imperfecta (OI). We investigated contemporary spinal fusion techniques including pedicle screw fixation with or without cement augmentation in OI patients with scoliosis. Materials and Methods: OI patients with posterior-only scoliosis surgery were reviewed retrospectively (2005–2017). Preoperative and postoperative clinical status was compared. The radiographic review included pelvic obliquity, major curve magnitude, coronal balance, apical vertebral translation (AVT), lowest instrumented vertebrae (LIV) tilt angle, proximal and distal junctional angle, T1–S1 distance, and T1-pelvic angle. Results: Sixteen patients were included in the study. The mean age at surgery was 14 years (range, 6–19). The average follow-up period was 80 ± 40 months (range, 24–148). Mean preoperative curve magnitude of 76° ± 19° was significantly larger than the initial (31° ± 16°) and final (32° ± 17°) postoperative curve magnitudes (58% correction; P < 0.001). Mean preoperative AVT and LIV tilt angle were significantly higher than the initial and final postoperative measurements (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively). There was no difference between the measurements of coronal balance, pelvic obliquity, and T1–S1 distance among the preoperative, initial postoperative, and final follow-up measurements (P = 0.479, P= 0.125, and P= 0.05, respectively). There was no proximal junctional failure but one distal junctional failure led to revision surgery. Ambulatory status was unchanged in all patients, but an improvement in subjective self-reported clinical complaints was observed. Conclusion: Pedicle screw instrumentation with or without cement augmentation provided stability with few complications and improved clinical outcomes. Although preoperative activity level did not change compared with postoperative activity, there was an improvement in self-reported clinical complaints.http://www.isjonline.com/article.asp?issn=2589-5079;year=2019;volume=2;issue=2;spage=114;epage=121;aulast=Cobanoglucement augmentationosteogenesis imperfectascoliosis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mutlu Cobanoglu
Jennifer M Bauer
Geraldine Neiss
Petya Yorgova
Kenneth Rogers
Richard W Kruse
Suken A Shah
spellingShingle Mutlu Cobanoglu
Jennifer M Bauer
Geraldine Neiss
Petya Yorgova
Kenneth Rogers
Richard W Kruse
Suken A Shah
Treatment of scoliosis in osteogenesis imperfecta: Experience at a single institution
Indian Spine Journal
cement augmentation
osteogenesis imperfecta
scoliosis
author_facet Mutlu Cobanoglu
Jennifer M Bauer
Geraldine Neiss
Petya Yorgova
Kenneth Rogers
Richard W Kruse
Suken A Shah
author_sort Mutlu Cobanoglu
title Treatment of scoliosis in osteogenesis imperfecta: Experience at a single institution
title_short Treatment of scoliosis in osteogenesis imperfecta: Experience at a single institution
title_full Treatment of scoliosis in osteogenesis imperfecta: Experience at a single institution
title_fullStr Treatment of scoliosis in osteogenesis imperfecta: Experience at a single institution
title_full_unstemmed Treatment of scoliosis in osteogenesis imperfecta: Experience at a single institution
title_sort treatment of scoliosis in osteogenesis imperfecta: experience at a single institution
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Indian Spine Journal
issn 2589-5079
2589-5087
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Background: Spinal deformities are frequently seen in osteogenesis imperfecta (OI). We investigated contemporary spinal fusion techniques including pedicle screw fixation with or without cement augmentation in OI patients with scoliosis. Materials and Methods: OI patients with posterior-only scoliosis surgery were reviewed retrospectively (2005–2017). Preoperative and postoperative clinical status was compared. The radiographic review included pelvic obliquity, major curve magnitude, coronal balance, apical vertebral translation (AVT), lowest instrumented vertebrae (LIV) tilt angle, proximal and distal junctional angle, T1–S1 distance, and T1-pelvic angle. Results: Sixteen patients were included in the study. The mean age at surgery was 14 years (range, 6–19). The average follow-up period was 80 ± 40 months (range, 24–148). Mean preoperative curve magnitude of 76° ± 19° was significantly larger than the initial (31° ± 16°) and final (32° ± 17°) postoperative curve magnitudes (58% correction; P < 0.001). Mean preoperative AVT and LIV tilt angle were significantly higher than the initial and final postoperative measurements (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively). There was no difference between the measurements of coronal balance, pelvic obliquity, and T1–S1 distance among the preoperative, initial postoperative, and final follow-up measurements (P = 0.479, P= 0.125, and P= 0.05, respectively). There was no proximal junctional failure but one distal junctional failure led to revision surgery. Ambulatory status was unchanged in all patients, but an improvement in subjective self-reported clinical complaints was observed. Conclusion: Pedicle screw instrumentation with or without cement augmentation provided stability with few complications and improved clinical outcomes. Although preoperative activity level did not change compared with postoperative activity, there was an improvement in self-reported clinical complaints.
topic cement augmentation
osteogenesis imperfecta
scoliosis
url http://www.isjonline.com/article.asp?issn=2589-5079;year=2019;volume=2;issue=2;spage=114;epage=121;aulast=Cobanoglu
work_keys_str_mv AT mutlucobanoglu treatmentofscoliosisinosteogenesisimperfectaexperienceatasingleinstitution
AT jennifermbauer treatmentofscoliosisinosteogenesisimperfectaexperienceatasingleinstitution
AT geraldineneiss treatmentofscoliosisinosteogenesisimperfectaexperienceatasingleinstitution
AT petyayorgova treatmentofscoliosisinosteogenesisimperfectaexperienceatasingleinstitution
AT kennethrogers treatmentofscoliosisinosteogenesisimperfectaexperienceatasingleinstitution
AT richardwkruse treatmentofscoliosisinosteogenesisimperfectaexperienceatasingleinstitution
AT sukenashah treatmentofscoliosisinosteogenesisimperfectaexperienceatasingleinstitution
_version_ 1721407054013267968