Inferences from structural comparison: flexibility, secondary structure wobble and sequence alignment optimization

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Work on protein structure prediction is very useful in biological research. To evaluate their accuracy, experimental protein structures or their derived data are used as the 'gold standard'. However, as proteins are dynamic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zhang Gaihua, Su Zhen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2012-09-01
Series:BMC Bioinformatics
id doaj-7849ade111ff46a9857b93eff5287799
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7849ade111ff46a9857b93eff52877992020-11-25T01:02:50ZengBMCBMC Bioinformatics1471-21052012-09-0113Suppl 15S1210.1186/1471-2105-13-S15-S12Inferences from structural comparison: flexibility, secondary structure wobble and sequence alignment optimizationZhang GaihuaSu Zhen<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Work on protein structure prediction is very useful in biological research. To evaluate their accuracy, experimental protein structures or their derived data are used as the 'gold standard'. However, as proteins are dynamic molecular machines with structural flexibility such a standard may be unreliable.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>To investigate the influence of the structure flexibility, we analysed 3,652 protein structures of 137 unique sequences from 24 protein families. The results showed that (1) the three-dimensional (3D) protein structures were not rigid: the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) of the backbone C<sub>α </sub>of structures with identical sequences was relatively large, with the average of the maximum RMSD from each of the 137 sequences being 1.06 Å; (2) the derived data of the 3D structure was not constant, e.g. the highest ratio of the secondary structure wobble site was 60.69%, with the sequence alignments from structural comparisons of two proteins in the same family sometimes being completely different.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Proteins may have several stable conformations and the data derived from resolved structures as a 'gold standard' should be optimized before being utilized as criteria to evaluate the prediction methods, e.g. sequence alignment from structural comparison. Helix/β-sheet transition exists in normal free proteins. The coil ratio of the 3D structure could affect its resolution as determined by X-ray crystallography.</p>
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Zhang Gaihua
Su Zhen
spellingShingle Zhang Gaihua
Su Zhen
Inferences from structural comparison: flexibility, secondary structure wobble and sequence alignment optimization
BMC Bioinformatics
author_facet Zhang Gaihua
Su Zhen
author_sort Zhang Gaihua
title Inferences from structural comparison: flexibility, secondary structure wobble and sequence alignment optimization
title_short Inferences from structural comparison: flexibility, secondary structure wobble and sequence alignment optimization
title_full Inferences from structural comparison: flexibility, secondary structure wobble and sequence alignment optimization
title_fullStr Inferences from structural comparison: flexibility, secondary structure wobble and sequence alignment optimization
title_full_unstemmed Inferences from structural comparison: flexibility, secondary structure wobble and sequence alignment optimization
title_sort inferences from structural comparison: flexibility, secondary structure wobble and sequence alignment optimization
publisher BMC
series BMC Bioinformatics
issn 1471-2105
publishDate 2012-09-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Work on protein structure prediction is very useful in biological research. To evaluate their accuracy, experimental protein structures or their derived data are used as the 'gold standard'. However, as proteins are dynamic molecular machines with structural flexibility such a standard may be unreliable.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>To investigate the influence of the structure flexibility, we analysed 3,652 protein structures of 137 unique sequences from 24 protein families. The results showed that (1) the three-dimensional (3D) protein structures were not rigid: the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) of the backbone C<sub>α </sub>of structures with identical sequences was relatively large, with the average of the maximum RMSD from each of the 137 sequences being 1.06 Å; (2) the derived data of the 3D structure was not constant, e.g. the highest ratio of the secondary structure wobble site was 60.69%, with the sequence alignments from structural comparisons of two proteins in the same family sometimes being completely different.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Proteins may have several stable conformations and the data derived from resolved structures as a 'gold standard' should be optimized before being utilized as criteria to evaluate the prediction methods, e.g. sequence alignment from structural comparison. Helix/β-sheet transition exists in normal free proteins. The coil ratio of the 3D structure could affect its resolution as determined by X-ray crystallography.</p>
work_keys_str_mv AT zhanggaihua inferencesfromstructuralcomparisonflexibilitysecondarystructurewobbleandsequencealignmentoptimization
AT suzhen inferencesfromstructuralcomparisonflexibilitysecondarystructurewobbleandsequencealignmentoptimization
_version_ 1725203480184881152