Dilemmas in anticoagulation and use of inferior vena cava filters in venous thromboembolism; a survey of Respiratory Physicians, Haematologists and Medical Oncologists and a review of the literature

Twenty percent of patients with Cancer Associated Thrombosis receive an inferior vena cava filter annually. Insertion is guided by practice guidelines, which do not specify or discuss the use of inferior vena cava filters in malignancy. Adherence to these guidelines is known to be variable. We aimed...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Philip Craven, Ciara Daly, Nisha Sikotra, Tim Clay, Eli Gabbay
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2021-01-01
Series:Pulmonary Circulation
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2045894020953841
id doaj-788a864ef3bb439bbac3dcc8a9d8ba14
record_format Article
spelling doaj-788a864ef3bb439bbac3dcc8a9d8ba142021-01-08T00:03:31ZengSAGE PublishingPulmonary Circulation2045-89402021-01-011110.1177/2045894020953841Dilemmas in anticoagulation and use of inferior vena cava filters in venous thromboembolism; a survey of Respiratory Physicians, Haematologists and Medical Oncologists and a review of the literaturePhilip Craven0Ciara Daly1Nisha Sikotra2Tim Clay3Eli Gabbay4Bendat Respiratory Research and Development Fund, St John of God Healthcare, Subiaco, AustraliaDepartment of Medical Oncology, St John of God Healthcare, Subiaco, AustraliaResearch Department, St John of God Healthcare, Subiaco, AustraliaSchool of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, AustraliaDepartment of Medical Teaching, St John of God Healthcare, Subiaco, AustraliaTwenty percent of patients with Cancer Associated Thrombosis receive an inferior vena cava filter annually. Insertion is guided by practice guidelines, which do not specify or discuss the use of inferior vena cava filters in malignancy. Adherence to these guidelines is known to be variable. We aimed to see if there was consistent management of venous thromboembolism among Medical Oncologists/Haematologists and Respiratory Physicians, with respect to inferior vena cava filter use in the setting of suspected and confirmed malignancy. Medical Oncologists, Haematologists and Respiratory Physicians were surveyed with four theoretical cases. Case 1 concerns a patient who develops a pulmonary embolism following spinal surgery. Cases 2 and 4 explore the use of inferior vena cava filters in the setting of malignancy. Case 3 covers the role of inferior vena cava filters in recurrent thrombosis despite systemic anticoagulation. There were 56 responses, 32 (57%) Respiratory Physicians and 24 (43%) Haematologists/Oncologists. Respiratory Physicians were significantly more likely to insert an inferior vena cava filter in case 1 ( p  = 0.04) whilst Haematologists/Medical Oncologists were more likely to insert an inferior vena cava filter in case 3 ( p  = 0.03). No significant differences were found in cases 2 and 4. There were significant disparities in terms of type and timing of anticoagulation. Consistency of recommendations with guidelines was variable likely in part because guidelines are themselves inconsistent. The heterogeneity in responses highlights the variations in venous thromboembolism management, especially in Cancer Associated Thrombosis. International Societies should consider addressing inferior vena cava filter use specifically in the setting of Cancer Associated Thrombosis. Collaboration between interested specialities would assist in developing consistent, evidence-based guidelines for the use of inferior vena cava filters in the management of venous thromboembolism.https://doi.org/10.1177/2045894020953841
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Philip Craven
Ciara Daly
Nisha Sikotra
Tim Clay
Eli Gabbay
spellingShingle Philip Craven
Ciara Daly
Nisha Sikotra
Tim Clay
Eli Gabbay
Dilemmas in anticoagulation and use of inferior vena cava filters in venous thromboembolism; a survey of Respiratory Physicians, Haematologists and Medical Oncologists and a review of the literature
Pulmonary Circulation
author_facet Philip Craven
Ciara Daly
Nisha Sikotra
Tim Clay
Eli Gabbay
author_sort Philip Craven
title Dilemmas in anticoagulation and use of inferior vena cava filters in venous thromboembolism; a survey of Respiratory Physicians, Haematologists and Medical Oncologists and a review of the literature
title_short Dilemmas in anticoagulation and use of inferior vena cava filters in venous thromboembolism; a survey of Respiratory Physicians, Haematologists and Medical Oncologists and a review of the literature
title_full Dilemmas in anticoagulation and use of inferior vena cava filters in venous thromboembolism; a survey of Respiratory Physicians, Haematologists and Medical Oncologists and a review of the literature
title_fullStr Dilemmas in anticoagulation and use of inferior vena cava filters in venous thromboembolism; a survey of Respiratory Physicians, Haematologists and Medical Oncologists and a review of the literature
title_full_unstemmed Dilemmas in anticoagulation and use of inferior vena cava filters in venous thromboembolism; a survey of Respiratory Physicians, Haematologists and Medical Oncologists and a review of the literature
title_sort dilemmas in anticoagulation and use of inferior vena cava filters in venous thromboembolism; a survey of respiratory physicians, haematologists and medical oncologists and a review of the literature
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Pulmonary Circulation
issn 2045-8940
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Twenty percent of patients with Cancer Associated Thrombosis receive an inferior vena cava filter annually. Insertion is guided by practice guidelines, which do not specify or discuss the use of inferior vena cava filters in malignancy. Adherence to these guidelines is known to be variable. We aimed to see if there was consistent management of venous thromboembolism among Medical Oncologists/Haematologists and Respiratory Physicians, with respect to inferior vena cava filter use in the setting of suspected and confirmed malignancy. Medical Oncologists, Haematologists and Respiratory Physicians were surveyed with four theoretical cases. Case 1 concerns a patient who develops a pulmonary embolism following spinal surgery. Cases 2 and 4 explore the use of inferior vena cava filters in the setting of malignancy. Case 3 covers the role of inferior vena cava filters in recurrent thrombosis despite systemic anticoagulation. There were 56 responses, 32 (57%) Respiratory Physicians and 24 (43%) Haematologists/Oncologists. Respiratory Physicians were significantly more likely to insert an inferior vena cava filter in case 1 ( p  = 0.04) whilst Haematologists/Medical Oncologists were more likely to insert an inferior vena cava filter in case 3 ( p  = 0.03). No significant differences were found in cases 2 and 4. There were significant disparities in terms of type and timing of anticoagulation. Consistency of recommendations with guidelines was variable likely in part because guidelines are themselves inconsistent. The heterogeneity in responses highlights the variations in venous thromboembolism management, especially in Cancer Associated Thrombosis. International Societies should consider addressing inferior vena cava filter use specifically in the setting of Cancer Associated Thrombosis. Collaboration between interested specialities would assist in developing consistent, evidence-based guidelines for the use of inferior vena cava filters in the management of venous thromboembolism.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2045894020953841
work_keys_str_mv AT philipcraven dilemmasinanticoagulationanduseofinferiorvenacavafiltersinvenousthromboembolismasurveyofrespiratoryphysicianshaematologistsandmedicaloncologistsandareviewoftheliterature
AT ciaradaly dilemmasinanticoagulationanduseofinferiorvenacavafiltersinvenousthromboembolismasurveyofrespiratoryphysicianshaematologistsandmedicaloncologistsandareviewoftheliterature
AT nishasikotra dilemmasinanticoagulationanduseofinferiorvenacavafiltersinvenousthromboembolismasurveyofrespiratoryphysicianshaematologistsandmedicaloncologistsandareviewoftheliterature
AT timclay dilemmasinanticoagulationanduseofinferiorvenacavafiltersinvenousthromboembolismasurveyofrespiratoryphysicianshaematologistsandmedicaloncologistsandareviewoftheliterature
AT eligabbay dilemmasinanticoagulationanduseofinferiorvenacavafiltersinvenousthromboembolismasurveyofrespiratoryphysicianshaematologistsandmedicaloncologistsandareviewoftheliterature
_version_ 1724345845724217344