Specific barriers to the conduct of randomised clinical trials on medical devices

Abstract Background Medical devices play an important role in the diagnosis, prevention, treatment and care of diseases. However, compared to pharmaceuticals, there is no rigorous formal regulation for demonstration of benefits and exclusion of harms to patients. The medical device industry argues t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Edmund A. M. Neugebauer, Ana Rath, Sunya-Lee Antoine, Michaela Eikermann, Doerthe Seidel, Carsten Koenen, Esther Jacobs, Dawid Pieper, Martine Laville, Séverine Pitel, Cecilia Martinho, Snezana Djurisic, Jacques Demotes-Mainard, Christine Kubiak, Vittorio Bertele, Janus C. Jakobsen, Silvio Garattini, Christian Gluud
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2017-09-01
Series:Trials
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-017-2168-0
id doaj-789d713ad1c644c6b9323d8a1747ace3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-789d713ad1c644c6b9323d8a1747ace32020-11-25T00:32:15ZengBMCTrials1745-62152017-09-0118111010.1186/s13063-017-2168-0Specific barriers to the conduct of randomised clinical trials on medical devicesEdmund A. M. Neugebauer0Ana Rath1Sunya-Lee Antoine2Michaela Eikermann3Doerthe Seidel4Carsten Koenen5Esther Jacobs6Dawid Pieper7Martine Laville8Séverine Pitel9Cecilia Martinho10Snezana Djurisic11Jacques Demotes-Mainard12Christine Kubiak13Vittorio Bertele14Janus C. Jakobsen15Silvio Garattini16Christian Gluud17Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane & Health Services Research Witten/Herdecke UniversityOrphanet, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)Institute for Research in Operative Medicine, Witten/Herdecke UniversityInstitute for Research in Operative Medicine, Witten/Herdecke UniversityInstitute for Research in Operative Medicine, Witten/Herdecke UniversityInstitute for Research in Operative Medicine, Witten/Herdecke UniversityInstitute for Research in Operative Medicine, Witten/Herdecke UniversityInstitute for Research in Operative Medicine, Witten/Herdecke UniversityCentre de Recherche en Nutrition Humaine Rhone-Alpes, Université de Lyon 1, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Groupement Hospitaler SudQUALISSIMAAIBILICopenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalEuropean Clinical Research Infrastructure Network (ECRIN)European Clinical Research Infrastructure Network (ECRIN)IRCCS Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario NegriCopenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalIRCCS Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario NegriCopenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalAbstract Background Medical devices play an important role in the diagnosis, prevention, treatment and care of diseases. However, compared to pharmaceuticals, there is no rigorous formal regulation for demonstration of benefits and exclusion of harms to patients. The medical device industry argues that the classical evidence hierarchy cannot be applied for medical devices, as randomised clinical trials are impossible to perform. This article aims to identify the barriers for randomised clinical trials on medical devices. Methods Systematic literature searches without meta-analysis and internal European Clinical Research Infrastructure Network (ECRIN) communications taking place during face-to-face meetings and telephone conferences from 2013 to 2017 within the context of the ECRIN Integrating Activity (ECRIN-IA) project. Results In addition to the barriers that exist for all trials, we identified three major barriers for randomised clinical trials on medical devices, namely: (1) randomisation, including timing of assessment, acceptability, blinding, choice of the comparator group and considerations on the learning curve; (2) difficulties in determining appropriate outcomes; and (3) the lack of scientific advice, regulations and transparency. Conclusions The present review offers potential solutions to break down the barriers identified, and argues for applying the randomised clinical trial design when assessing the benefits and harms of medical devices.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-017-2168-0Randomised clinical trialsEvidence-based clinical practiceEvidence-based medicineAssessmentSpecific barriersMedical devices
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Edmund A. M. Neugebauer
Ana Rath
Sunya-Lee Antoine
Michaela Eikermann
Doerthe Seidel
Carsten Koenen
Esther Jacobs
Dawid Pieper
Martine Laville
Séverine Pitel
Cecilia Martinho
Snezana Djurisic
Jacques Demotes-Mainard
Christine Kubiak
Vittorio Bertele
Janus C. Jakobsen
Silvio Garattini
Christian Gluud
spellingShingle Edmund A. M. Neugebauer
Ana Rath
Sunya-Lee Antoine
Michaela Eikermann
Doerthe Seidel
Carsten Koenen
Esther Jacobs
Dawid Pieper
Martine Laville
Séverine Pitel
Cecilia Martinho
Snezana Djurisic
Jacques Demotes-Mainard
Christine Kubiak
Vittorio Bertele
Janus C. Jakobsen
Silvio Garattini
Christian Gluud
Specific barriers to the conduct of randomised clinical trials on medical devices
Trials
Randomised clinical trials
Evidence-based clinical practice
Evidence-based medicine
Assessment
Specific barriers
Medical devices
author_facet Edmund A. M. Neugebauer
Ana Rath
Sunya-Lee Antoine
Michaela Eikermann
Doerthe Seidel
Carsten Koenen
Esther Jacobs
Dawid Pieper
Martine Laville
Séverine Pitel
Cecilia Martinho
Snezana Djurisic
Jacques Demotes-Mainard
Christine Kubiak
Vittorio Bertele
Janus C. Jakobsen
Silvio Garattini
Christian Gluud
author_sort Edmund A. M. Neugebauer
title Specific barriers to the conduct of randomised clinical trials on medical devices
title_short Specific barriers to the conduct of randomised clinical trials on medical devices
title_full Specific barriers to the conduct of randomised clinical trials on medical devices
title_fullStr Specific barriers to the conduct of randomised clinical trials on medical devices
title_full_unstemmed Specific barriers to the conduct of randomised clinical trials on medical devices
title_sort specific barriers to the conduct of randomised clinical trials on medical devices
publisher BMC
series Trials
issn 1745-6215
publishDate 2017-09-01
description Abstract Background Medical devices play an important role in the diagnosis, prevention, treatment and care of diseases. However, compared to pharmaceuticals, there is no rigorous formal regulation for demonstration of benefits and exclusion of harms to patients. The medical device industry argues that the classical evidence hierarchy cannot be applied for medical devices, as randomised clinical trials are impossible to perform. This article aims to identify the barriers for randomised clinical trials on medical devices. Methods Systematic literature searches without meta-analysis and internal European Clinical Research Infrastructure Network (ECRIN) communications taking place during face-to-face meetings and telephone conferences from 2013 to 2017 within the context of the ECRIN Integrating Activity (ECRIN-IA) project. Results In addition to the barriers that exist for all trials, we identified three major barriers for randomised clinical trials on medical devices, namely: (1) randomisation, including timing of assessment, acceptability, blinding, choice of the comparator group and considerations on the learning curve; (2) difficulties in determining appropriate outcomes; and (3) the lack of scientific advice, regulations and transparency. Conclusions The present review offers potential solutions to break down the barriers identified, and argues for applying the randomised clinical trial design when assessing the benefits and harms of medical devices.
topic Randomised clinical trials
Evidence-based clinical practice
Evidence-based medicine
Assessment
Specific barriers
Medical devices
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-017-2168-0
work_keys_str_mv AT edmundamneugebauer specificbarrierstotheconductofrandomisedclinicaltrialsonmedicaldevices
AT anarath specificbarrierstotheconductofrandomisedclinicaltrialsonmedicaldevices
AT sunyaleeantoine specificbarrierstotheconductofrandomisedclinicaltrialsonmedicaldevices
AT michaelaeikermann specificbarrierstotheconductofrandomisedclinicaltrialsonmedicaldevices
AT doertheseidel specificbarrierstotheconductofrandomisedclinicaltrialsonmedicaldevices
AT carstenkoenen specificbarrierstotheconductofrandomisedclinicaltrialsonmedicaldevices
AT estherjacobs specificbarrierstotheconductofrandomisedclinicaltrialsonmedicaldevices
AT dawidpieper specificbarrierstotheconductofrandomisedclinicaltrialsonmedicaldevices
AT martinelaville specificbarrierstotheconductofrandomisedclinicaltrialsonmedicaldevices
AT severinepitel specificbarrierstotheconductofrandomisedclinicaltrialsonmedicaldevices
AT ceciliamartinho specificbarrierstotheconductofrandomisedclinicaltrialsonmedicaldevices
AT snezanadjurisic specificbarrierstotheconductofrandomisedclinicaltrialsonmedicaldevices
AT jacquesdemotesmainard specificbarrierstotheconductofrandomisedclinicaltrialsonmedicaldevices
AT christinekubiak specificbarrierstotheconductofrandomisedclinicaltrialsonmedicaldevices
AT vittoriobertele specificbarrierstotheconductofrandomisedclinicaltrialsonmedicaldevices
AT januscjakobsen specificbarrierstotheconductofrandomisedclinicaltrialsonmedicaldevices
AT silviogarattini specificbarrierstotheconductofrandomisedclinicaltrialsonmedicaldevices
AT christiangluud specificbarrierstotheconductofrandomisedclinicaltrialsonmedicaldevices
_version_ 1725320034983608320