Granice fizyki w kosmologii

The message is that physics has an „outward bound” of scientific inquiry in the field of cosmology. I present it in the historical development. Physics and astronomy, developing since the seventeenth century, inherited from the early Greek philosophers the conception that the Universe as a whole is...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Leszek M. Sokołowski
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Copernicus Center Press 2015-12-01
Series:Zagadnienia Filozoficzne w Nauce
Subjects:
Online Access:http://zfn.edu.pl/index.php/zfn/article/view/181
id doaj-78cb89d77bd04b9bba70f2ca21f3ab0c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-78cb89d77bd04b9bba70f2ca21f3ab0c2020-11-24T20:51:58ZdeuCopernicus Center PressZagadnienia Filozoficzne w Nauce0867-82862451-06022015-12-01592581174Granice fizyki w kosmologiiLeszek M. Sokołowski0Obserwatorium Astronomiczne Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, Centrum Kopernika Badań InterdyscyplinarnychThe message is that physics has an „outward bound” of scientific inquiry in the field of cosmology. I present it in the historical development. Physics and astronomy, developing since the seventeenth century, inherited from the early Greek philosophers the conception that the Universe as a whole is invariable. In nineteenth century this conception in conjunction with the conception of eternity of the Universe (being a philosophical conclusion from the conservation laws of mass and energy) gave rise to contradictions with other laws of physics indicating that cosmology is not a branch of physics since the notion of the Universe is not a physical one. Cosmology returned to physics as its important branch due to the advent of general relativity theory and the discovery of the cosmic microwave background radiation. Modern cosmology generates fundamental problems creating real limits to inquiries in physics viewed as an empirical science. The very notion of the Universe shows that the scientific method reaches there limits of its applicability. Does „to exist” mean „to be observed by someone”? Should the definition of the Universe be based on a current physical theory, e.g. on Einstein’s general relativity, giving rise to a kind of mathematical instability? Is the fashionable concept of the „multiverse” a physical one or is a purely metaphysical notion in a scientific disguise? If the Universe is unique (as we believe), is it meaningful to describe it in the framework of physics, which by its method always assumes that the number of objects it describes, is unlimited? Apart from these permanent philosophical problems there are concrete urgent problems generated by cosmology: the nature of dark matter and dark energy. These two species of „substance” appear only in cosmology and do not fit the laboratory physics; contrary to the three centuries long tradition of modern science, now cosmology inspires physics in a troublesome way. A separate class of limits to physics is generated by the theorem in general relativity that the Universe emerged from an initial curvature singularity of the spacetime. At the singularity the whole scientific inquiry breaks down. Cosmology of the very early Universe suggests that in its evolution two specific epochs took place, that of quantum gravity and an inflationary epoch. The underlying them two physical theories are incomplete and seem to be inherently untestable. Furthermore, the experimentally verifiable physics cannot explain the origin of the initial conditions determining properties of the Universe which emerged from the singularity.http://zfn.edu.pl/index.php/zfn/article/view/181physical cosmologythe notion of the Universedark matter and dark energyfalsifiability of quantum gravityorigin of the Universe
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Leszek M. Sokołowski
spellingShingle Leszek M. Sokołowski
Granice fizyki w kosmologii
Zagadnienia Filozoficzne w Nauce
physical cosmology
the notion of the Universe
dark matter and dark energy
falsifiability of quantum gravity
origin of the Universe
author_facet Leszek M. Sokołowski
author_sort Leszek M. Sokołowski
title Granice fizyki w kosmologii
title_short Granice fizyki w kosmologii
title_full Granice fizyki w kosmologii
title_fullStr Granice fizyki w kosmologii
title_full_unstemmed Granice fizyki w kosmologii
title_sort granice fizyki w kosmologii
publisher Copernicus Center Press
series Zagadnienia Filozoficzne w Nauce
issn 0867-8286
2451-0602
publishDate 2015-12-01
description The message is that physics has an „outward bound” of scientific inquiry in the field of cosmology. I present it in the historical development. Physics and astronomy, developing since the seventeenth century, inherited from the early Greek philosophers the conception that the Universe as a whole is invariable. In nineteenth century this conception in conjunction with the conception of eternity of the Universe (being a philosophical conclusion from the conservation laws of mass and energy) gave rise to contradictions with other laws of physics indicating that cosmology is not a branch of physics since the notion of the Universe is not a physical one. Cosmology returned to physics as its important branch due to the advent of general relativity theory and the discovery of the cosmic microwave background radiation. Modern cosmology generates fundamental problems creating real limits to inquiries in physics viewed as an empirical science. The very notion of the Universe shows that the scientific method reaches there limits of its applicability. Does „to exist” mean „to be observed by someone”? Should the definition of the Universe be based on a current physical theory, e.g. on Einstein’s general relativity, giving rise to a kind of mathematical instability? Is the fashionable concept of the „multiverse” a physical one or is a purely metaphysical notion in a scientific disguise? If the Universe is unique (as we believe), is it meaningful to describe it in the framework of physics, which by its method always assumes that the number of objects it describes, is unlimited? Apart from these permanent philosophical problems there are concrete urgent problems generated by cosmology: the nature of dark matter and dark energy. These two species of „substance” appear only in cosmology and do not fit the laboratory physics; contrary to the three centuries long tradition of modern science, now cosmology inspires physics in a troublesome way. A separate class of limits to physics is generated by the theorem in general relativity that the Universe emerged from an initial curvature singularity of the spacetime. At the singularity the whole scientific inquiry breaks down. Cosmology of the very early Universe suggests that in its evolution two specific epochs took place, that of quantum gravity and an inflationary epoch. The underlying them two physical theories are incomplete and seem to be inherently untestable. Furthermore, the experimentally verifiable physics cannot explain the origin of the initial conditions determining properties of the Universe which emerged from the singularity.
topic physical cosmology
the notion of the Universe
dark matter and dark energy
falsifiability of quantum gravity
origin of the Universe
url http://zfn.edu.pl/index.php/zfn/article/view/181
work_keys_str_mv AT leszekmsokołowski granicefizykiwkosmologii
_version_ 1716800717336870912