A review of continuous vs intermittent androgen deprivation therapy: Redefining the gold standard in the treatment of advanced prostate cancer. Myths, facts and new data on a perpetual dispute

Objectives: To review the literature and present new data of continuous androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) vs intermittent androgen deprivation (IAD) as therapies for prostate cancer in terms of survival and quality of life and clarify practical issues in the use of IAD. Materials and Methods: We...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zisis Kratiras, Charalampos Konstantinidis, Konstantinos Skriapas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2014-01-01
Series:International Brazilian Journal of Urology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382014000100003&lng=en&tlng=en
id doaj-78ed5bdd3bd74f3a92575ecc3d3ee843
record_format Article
spelling doaj-78ed5bdd3bd74f3a92575ecc3d3ee8432020-11-24T23:36:47ZengSociedade Brasileira de UrologiaInternational Brazilian Journal of Urology1677-61192014-01-0140131510.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.01.02S1677-55382014000100003A review of continuous vs intermittent androgen deprivation therapy: Redefining the gold standard in the treatment of advanced prostate cancer. Myths, facts and new data on a perpetual disputeZisis KratirasCharalampos KonstantinidisKonstantinos SkriapasObjectives: To review the literature and present new data of continuous androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) vs intermittent androgen deprivation (IAD) as therapies for prostate cancer in terms of survival and quality of life and clarify practical issues in the use of IAD. Materials and Methods: We conducted a systematic search on Medline and Embase databases using “prostatic neoplasm” and “intermittent androgen deprivation” as search terms. We reviewed meta-analyses, randomised controlled trials, reviews, clinical trials and practise guidelines written in English from 2000 and onwards until 01/04/2013. Ten randomized controlled trials were identified. Seven of them published extensive data and results randomizing 4675 patients to IAD versus CAD. Data from the other three randomized trials were limited. Results: Over the last years studies confirmed that IAD is an effective alternative approach to hormonal deprivation providing simultaneously several potential benefits in terms of quality of life and cost effectiveness. Thus, in patients with non metastatic, advanced prostate cancer IAD could be used as standard treatment, while in metastatic prostate cancer IAD role still remains ambiguous. Conclusions: Nowadays, revaluation of the gold standard of ADT in advanced prostate cancer appears essential. Recent data established that IAD should no longer be considered as investigational, since its effectiveness has been proven, especially in patients suffering from non-metastatic advanced prostate cancer.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382014000100003&lng=en&tlng=enProstatic NeoplasmsTherapeuticsQuality of LifeAndrogens
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Zisis Kratiras
Charalampos Konstantinidis
Konstantinos Skriapas
spellingShingle Zisis Kratiras
Charalampos Konstantinidis
Konstantinos Skriapas
A review of continuous vs intermittent androgen deprivation therapy: Redefining the gold standard in the treatment of advanced prostate cancer. Myths, facts and new data on a perpetual dispute
International Brazilian Journal of Urology
Prostatic Neoplasms
Therapeutics
Quality of Life
Androgens
author_facet Zisis Kratiras
Charalampos Konstantinidis
Konstantinos Skriapas
author_sort Zisis Kratiras
title A review of continuous vs intermittent androgen deprivation therapy: Redefining the gold standard in the treatment of advanced prostate cancer. Myths, facts and new data on a perpetual dispute
title_short A review of continuous vs intermittent androgen deprivation therapy: Redefining the gold standard in the treatment of advanced prostate cancer. Myths, facts and new data on a perpetual dispute
title_full A review of continuous vs intermittent androgen deprivation therapy: Redefining the gold standard in the treatment of advanced prostate cancer. Myths, facts and new data on a perpetual dispute
title_fullStr A review of continuous vs intermittent androgen deprivation therapy: Redefining the gold standard in the treatment of advanced prostate cancer. Myths, facts and new data on a perpetual dispute
title_full_unstemmed A review of continuous vs intermittent androgen deprivation therapy: Redefining the gold standard in the treatment of advanced prostate cancer. Myths, facts and new data on a perpetual dispute
title_sort review of continuous vs intermittent androgen deprivation therapy: redefining the gold standard in the treatment of advanced prostate cancer. myths, facts and new data on a perpetual dispute
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
series International Brazilian Journal of Urology
issn 1677-6119
publishDate 2014-01-01
description Objectives: To review the literature and present new data of continuous androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) vs intermittent androgen deprivation (IAD) as therapies for prostate cancer in terms of survival and quality of life and clarify practical issues in the use of IAD. Materials and Methods: We conducted a systematic search on Medline and Embase databases using “prostatic neoplasm” and “intermittent androgen deprivation” as search terms. We reviewed meta-analyses, randomised controlled trials, reviews, clinical trials and practise guidelines written in English from 2000 and onwards until 01/04/2013. Ten randomized controlled trials were identified. Seven of them published extensive data and results randomizing 4675 patients to IAD versus CAD. Data from the other three randomized trials were limited. Results: Over the last years studies confirmed that IAD is an effective alternative approach to hormonal deprivation providing simultaneously several potential benefits in terms of quality of life and cost effectiveness. Thus, in patients with non metastatic, advanced prostate cancer IAD could be used as standard treatment, while in metastatic prostate cancer IAD role still remains ambiguous. Conclusions: Nowadays, revaluation of the gold standard of ADT in advanced prostate cancer appears essential. Recent data established that IAD should no longer be considered as investigational, since its effectiveness has been proven, especially in patients suffering from non-metastatic advanced prostate cancer.
topic Prostatic Neoplasms
Therapeutics
Quality of Life
Androgens
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382014000100003&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT zisiskratiras areviewofcontinuousvsintermittentandrogendeprivationtherapyredefiningthegoldstandardinthetreatmentofadvancedprostatecancermythsfactsandnewdataonaperpetualdispute
AT charalamposkonstantinidis areviewofcontinuousvsintermittentandrogendeprivationtherapyredefiningthegoldstandardinthetreatmentofadvancedprostatecancermythsfactsandnewdataonaperpetualdispute
AT konstantinosskriapas areviewofcontinuousvsintermittentandrogendeprivationtherapyredefiningthegoldstandardinthetreatmentofadvancedprostatecancermythsfactsandnewdataonaperpetualdispute
AT zisiskratiras reviewofcontinuousvsintermittentandrogendeprivationtherapyredefiningthegoldstandardinthetreatmentofadvancedprostatecancermythsfactsandnewdataonaperpetualdispute
AT charalamposkonstantinidis reviewofcontinuousvsintermittentandrogendeprivationtherapyredefiningthegoldstandardinthetreatmentofadvancedprostatecancermythsfactsandnewdataonaperpetualdispute
AT konstantinosskriapas reviewofcontinuousvsintermittentandrogendeprivationtherapyredefiningthegoldstandardinthetreatmentofadvancedprostatecancermythsfactsandnewdataonaperpetualdispute
_version_ 1725521648283549696