Effects of a Motion Seat System on Driver’s Passive Task-Related Fatigue: An On-Road Driving Study

• Main Authors: Seunghoon Lee, Minjae Kim, Hayoung Jung, Dohoon Kwon, Sunwoo Choi, Heecheon You
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: MDPI AG 2020-05-01
• Series: Sensors
• Subjects: passive task-related driver fatigue; monotonous driving; fatigue countermeasure; motion seat system
• Online Access: https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/9/2688

Passive task-related (TR) fatigue caused by monotonous driving can negatively affect driving safety by impairing driver alertness and performance. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a motion seat system on the driver’s passive TR fatigue in terms of driving performance, physiological response, and subjective fatigue by using automotive and physiological sensors those applicable to on-road driving environment. Twenty drivers (5 females and 15 males; age = 38.5 ± 12.2) with more than two years of driving experience participated in an on-road experiment with two driving conditions: driving in the static seat condition during the first half of the driving session and then in the static (static–static, SS) or motion seat (static–motion, SM) condition during the second half. The SM condition showed significantly lower passive TR fatigue by 4.4~56.5% compared to the SS condition in terms of the standard deviation of velocity, percentage of eyelid closure rate (PERCLOS), and the ratio of low- to high-frequency power (LF/HF) of electrocardiography signals. The drivers rated significantly lower subjective state changes of overall fatigue, mental fatigue, passive TR fatigue, drowsiness, and decreased concentration in the SM condition than those in the SS condition. The findings of the study support the use of a motion seat system can be an effective countermeasure to reduce passive TR fatigue.