Social ecological correlates of workplace sedentary behavior

Abstract Background To identify social ecological correlates of objectively measured workplace sedentary behavior. Methods Participants from 24 worksites - across academic, industrial, and government sectors - wore an activPAL-micro accelerometer for 7-days (Jan-Nov 2016). Work time was segmented us...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sarah L. Mullane, Meynard J.L. Toledo, Sarah A. Rydell, Linda H. Feltes, Brenna Vuong, Noe C. Crespo, Mark A. Pereira, Matthew P. Buman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2017-08-01
Series:International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12966-017-0576-x
id doaj-794c0f1f8d9745139ce11403329012f4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-794c0f1f8d9745139ce11403329012f42020-11-24T21:44:34ZengBMCInternational Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity1479-58682017-08-0114111010.1186/s12966-017-0576-xSocial ecological correlates of workplace sedentary behaviorSarah L. Mullane0Meynard J.L. Toledo1Sarah A. Rydell2Linda H. Feltes3Brenna Vuong4Noe C. Crespo5Mark A. Pereira6Matthew P. Buman7School of Nutrition and Health Promotion, College of Health Solutions, Arizona State UniversitySchool of Nutrition and Health Promotion, College of Health Solutions, Arizona State UniversityDivision of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of MinnesotaState of Minnesota Management and BudgetFairview Health ServicesGraduate School of Public Health, San Diego State UniversityDivision of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of MinnesotaSchool of Nutrition and Health Promotion, College of Health Solutions, Arizona State UniversityAbstract Background To identify social ecological correlates of objectively measured workplace sedentary behavior. Methods Participants from 24 worksites - across academic, industrial, and government sectors - wore an activPAL-micro accelerometer for 7-days (Jan-Nov 2016). Work time was segmented using daily logs. Sedentary behavior outcomes included time spent sitting, standing, in light intensity physical activity (LPA, stepping cadence <100 steps/min), and in prolonged sitting bouts (>30 min). Outcomes were standardized to an 8 h work day. Two electronic surveys were completed to derive individual (job type and work engagement), cultural (lunch away from the desk, walking at lunch and face-to-face interaction), physical (personal printer and office type) and organizational (sector) factors. Mixed-model analyses with worksite-level clustering were performed to examine multi-level associations. Secondary analyses examined job type and sector as moderators of these associations. All models were adjusted for age, race/ethnicity and gender. Results Participants (N = 478; 72% female; age: 45.0 ± 11.3 years; 77.8% non-Hispanic white) wore the activPAL-micro for 90.2 ± 15.5% of the reported workday. Walking at lunch was positively associated with LPA (5.0 ± 0.5 min/8 h, P < 0.001). Regular face-to-face interaction was negatively associated with prolonged sitting (−11.3 ± 4.8 min/8 h, P < 0.05). Individuals in private offices sat more (20.1 ± 9.1 min/8 h, P < 0.05), stood less (−21.5 ± 8.8 min/8 h, P < 0.05), and engaged in more prolonged sitting (40.9 ± 11.2 min/8 h, P < 0.001) than those in public office space. These associations were further modified by job type and sector. Conclusions Work-specific individual, cultural, physical and organizational factors are associated with workplace sedentary behavior. Associations vary by job type and sector and should be considered in the design of workplace interventions to reduce sedentary behavior. Trial registration Clinical trial No. NCT02566317 ; Registered Sept 22nd 2015.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12966-017-0576-xSedentary behaviorWorkplaceSocial ecological modelSector
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sarah L. Mullane
Meynard J.L. Toledo
Sarah A. Rydell
Linda H. Feltes
Brenna Vuong
Noe C. Crespo
Mark A. Pereira
Matthew P. Buman
spellingShingle Sarah L. Mullane
Meynard J.L. Toledo
Sarah A. Rydell
Linda H. Feltes
Brenna Vuong
Noe C. Crespo
Mark A. Pereira
Matthew P. Buman
Social ecological correlates of workplace sedentary behavior
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
Sedentary behavior
Workplace
Social ecological model
Sector
author_facet Sarah L. Mullane
Meynard J.L. Toledo
Sarah A. Rydell
Linda H. Feltes
Brenna Vuong
Noe C. Crespo
Mark A. Pereira
Matthew P. Buman
author_sort Sarah L. Mullane
title Social ecological correlates of workplace sedentary behavior
title_short Social ecological correlates of workplace sedentary behavior
title_full Social ecological correlates of workplace sedentary behavior
title_fullStr Social ecological correlates of workplace sedentary behavior
title_full_unstemmed Social ecological correlates of workplace sedentary behavior
title_sort social ecological correlates of workplace sedentary behavior
publisher BMC
series International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
issn 1479-5868
publishDate 2017-08-01
description Abstract Background To identify social ecological correlates of objectively measured workplace sedentary behavior. Methods Participants from 24 worksites - across academic, industrial, and government sectors - wore an activPAL-micro accelerometer for 7-days (Jan-Nov 2016). Work time was segmented using daily logs. Sedentary behavior outcomes included time spent sitting, standing, in light intensity physical activity (LPA, stepping cadence <100 steps/min), and in prolonged sitting bouts (>30 min). Outcomes were standardized to an 8 h work day. Two electronic surveys were completed to derive individual (job type and work engagement), cultural (lunch away from the desk, walking at lunch and face-to-face interaction), physical (personal printer and office type) and organizational (sector) factors. Mixed-model analyses with worksite-level clustering were performed to examine multi-level associations. Secondary analyses examined job type and sector as moderators of these associations. All models were adjusted for age, race/ethnicity and gender. Results Participants (N = 478; 72% female; age: 45.0 ± 11.3 years; 77.8% non-Hispanic white) wore the activPAL-micro for 90.2 ± 15.5% of the reported workday. Walking at lunch was positively associated with LPA (5.0 ± 0.5 min/8 h, P < 0.001). Regular face-to-face interaction was negatively associated with prolonged sitting (−11.3 ± 4.8 min/8 h, P < 0.05). Individuals in private offices sat more (20.1 ± 9.1 min/8 h, P < 0.05), stood less (−21.5 ± 8.8 min/8 h, P < 0.05), and engaged in more prolonged sitting (40.9 ± 11.2 min/8 h, P < 0.001) than those in public office space. These associations were further modified by job type and sector. Conclusions Work-specific individual, cultural, physical and organizational factors are associated with workplace sedentary behavior. Associations vary by job type and sector and should be considered in the design of workplace interventions to reduce sedentary behavior. Trial registration Clinical trial No. NCT02566317 ; Registered Sept 22nd 2015.
topic Sedentary behavior
Workplace
Social ecological model
Sector
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12966-017-0576-x
work_keys_str_mv AT sarahlmullane socialecologicalcorrelatesofworkplacesedentarybehavior
AT meynardjltoledo socialecologicalcorrelatesofworkplacesedentarybehavior
AT saraharydell socialecologicalcorrelatesofworkplacesedentarybehavior
AT lindahfeltes socialecologicalcorrelatesofworkplacesedentarybehavior
AT brennavuong socialecologicalcorrelatesofworkplacesedentarybehavior
AT noeccrespo socialecologicalcorrelatesofworkplacesedentarybehavior
AT markapereira socialecologicalcorrelatesofworkplacesedentarybehavior
AT matthewpbuman socialecologicalcorrelatesofworkplacesedentarybehavior
_version_ 1725909377037107200