Comparing the delay with different anticoagulants before elective electrical cardioversion for atrial fibrillation/flutter.

<h4>Aims</h4>To assess the impact of the introduction of direct oral anticoagulants upon the outcomes from elective electrical cardioversion for atrial fibrillation.<h4>Methods</h4>This is a retrospective comparison of delay to elective cardioversion with different anticoagul...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christopher Wall, Tania Jankowski, Vinci Naruka, Paula Mota
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2019-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210170
id doaj-796192a53255401ba35035410b85b02a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-796192a53255401ba35035410b85b02a2021-03-04T10:38:37ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032019-01-01141e021017010.1371/journal.pone.0210170Comparing the delay with different anticoagulants before elective electrical cardioversion for atrial fibrillation/flutter.Christopher WallTania JankowskiVinci NarukaPaula Mota<h4>Aims</h4>To assess the impact of the introduction of direct oral anticoagulants upon the outcomes from elective electrical cardioversion for atrial fibrillation.<h4>Methods</h4>This is a retrospective comparison of delay to elective cardioversion with different anticoagulants. The data was gathered from a large regional hospital from January 2013 to September 2017. There were 3 measured outcomes: 1) the time in weeks from referral to the date of attempted electrical cardioversion; 2) the proportion of patients who were successfully cardioverted; and 3) the proportion of patients who remained in sinus rhythm by the 12 week follow-up. Time-to-cardioversion was non-parametrically distributed so was analysed with Kruskal-Wallis testing and Mann-Whitney-U testing. Maintenance of sinus rhythm was analysed using z-testing.<h4>Results</h4>1,374 patients were submitted to cardioversion. The referrals for cardioversion were either from primary care or from cardiologists. At the time of cardioversion, 789 cases were anticoagulated on warfarin (W), 215 on apixaban (A) and 370 on rivaroxaban (R). All 3 cohorts were initially compared independently using Kruskal-Wallis testing. This demonstrated a significant difference in the delay (measured in weeks) between the A and W group (A = 7, W = 9, P<0.00001); the R and W group (R = 7, W = 9, P<0.00001) and no difference between R and A (A = 7, R = 7, P = 0.92). As there was no difference between the A and R groups, they were combined to form the AR group. The AR group was compared to the W group using Mann-Whitney-U testing which demonstrated a significant delay between the groups (AR = 7, W = 9, P<0.00001). Excluding patients with prior or unknown attempts of cardioversion (n = 791), the W patients (n = 152) were less successful in achieving sinus rhythm at cardioversion than the AR (n = 431) group (W = 95% vs AR = 99% P = 0.04). However at 12 weeks, incidence of sinus rhythm was significantly different (W = 40% vs AR = 49% P = 0.049). These groups were compared by z testing. At 12 weeks' follow-up there was no statistical difference in rate of adverse consequences between the AR group and the W group, but the rate of adverse consequences was too low to draw further conclusions.<h4>Conclusion</h4>DOACs appear to significantly shorten the latency between the decision to cardiovert and the cardioversion procedure by at least 2 weeks compared to warfarin in a real-world setting. In this study, patients who had not previously been cardioverted who were anticoagulated with warfarin had a significantly lower probability of conversion to sinus rhythm and a significantly lower probability to remain in sinus rhythm at the 12 week follow-up compared to the combined apixaban and rivaroxaban group.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210170
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Christopher Wall
Tania Jankowski
Vinci Naruka
Paula Mota
spellingShingle Christopher Wall
Tania Jankowski
Vinci Naruka
Paula Mota
Comparing the delay with different anticoagulants before elective electrical cardioversion for atrial fibrillation/flutter.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Christopher Wall
Tania Jankowski
Vinci Naruka
Paula Mota
author_sort Christopher Wall
title Comparing the delay with different anticoagulants before elective electrical cardioversion for atrial fibrillation/flutter.
title_short Comparing the delay with different anticoagulants before elective electrical cardioversion for atrial fibrillation/flutter.
title_full Comparing the delay with different anticoagulants before elective electrical cardioversion for atrial fibrillation/flutter.
title_fullStr Comparing the delay with different anticoagulants before elective electrical cardioversion for atrial fibrillation/flutter.
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the delay with different anticoagulants before elective electrical cardioversion for atrial fibrillation/flutter.
title_sort comparing the delay with different anticoagulants before elective electrical cardioversion for atrial fibrillation/flutter.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2019-01-01
description <h4>Aims</h4>To assess the impact of the introduction of direct oral anticoagulants upon the outcomes from elective electrical cardioversion for atrial fibrillation.<h4>Methods</h4>This is a retrospective comparison of delay to elective cardioversion with different anticoagulants. The data was gathered from a large regional hospital from January 2013 to September 2017. There were 3 measured outcomes: 1) the time in weeks from referral to the date of attempted electrical cardioversion; 2) the proportion of patients who were successfully cardioverted; and 3) the proportion of patients who remained in sinus rhythm by the 12 week follow-up. Time-to-cardioversion was non-parametrically distributed so was analysed with Kruskal-Wallis testing and Mann-Whitney-U testing. Maintenance of sinus rhythm was analysed using z-testing.<h4>Results</h4>1,374 patients were submitted to cardioversion. The referrals for cardioversion were either from primary care or from cardiologists. At the time of cardioversion, 789 cases were anticoagulated on warfarin (W), 215 on apixaban (A) and 370 on rivaroxaban (R). All 3 cohorts were initially compared independently using Kruskal-Wallis testing. This demonstrated a significant difference in the delay (measured in weeks) between the A and W group (A = 7, W = 9, P<0.00001); the R and W group (R = 7, W = 9, P<0.00001) and no difference between R and A (A = 7, R = 7, P = 0.92). As there was no difference between the A and R groups, they were combined to form the AR group. The AR group was compared to the W group using Mann-Whitney-U testing which demonstrated a significant delay between the groups (AR = 7, W = 9, P<0.00001). Excluding patients with prior or unknown attempts of cardioversion (n = 791), the W patients (n = 152) were less successful in achieving sinus rhythm at cardioversion than the AR (n = 431) group (W = 95% vs AR = 99% P = 0.04). However at 12 weeks, incidence of sinus rhythm was significantly different (W = 40% vs AR = 49% P = 0.049). These groups were compared by z testing. At 12 weeks' follow-up there was no statistical difference in rate of adverse consequences between the AR group and the W group, but the rate of adverse consequences was too low to draw further conclusions.<h4>Conclusion</h4>DOACs appear to significantly shorten the latency between the decision to cardiovert and the cardioversion procedure by at least 2 weeks compared to warfarin in a real-world setting. In this study, patients who had not previously been cardioverted who were anticoagulated with warfarin had a significantly lower probability of conversion to sinus rhythm and a significantly lower probability to remain in sinus rhythm at the 12 week follow-up compared to the combined apixaban and rivaroxaban group.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210170
work_keys_str_mv AT christopherwall comparingthedelaywithdifferentanticoagulantsbeforeelectiveelectricalcardioversionforatrialfibrillationflutter
AT taniajankowski comparingthedelaywithdifferentanticoagulantsbeforeelectiveelectricalcardioversionforatrialfibrillationflutter
AT vincinaruka comparingthedelaywithdifferentanticoagulantsbeforeelectiveelectricalcardioversionforatrialfibrillationflutter
AT paulamota comparingthedelaywithdifferentanticoagulantsbeforeelectiveelectricalcardioversionforatrialfibrillationflutter
_version_ 1714805121800470528