Differences in cortical response to acupressure and electroacupuncture stimuli

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>FMRI studies focus on sub-cortical effects of acupuncture stimuli. The purpose of this study was to assess changes in primary somatosensory (S1) activity over the course of different types of acupuncture stimulation. We used whole he...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vangel Mark G, Kettner Norman W, Napadow Vitaly, Witzel Thomas, Hämäläinen Matti S, Dhond Rupali P
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2011-07-01
Series:BMC Neuroscience
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2202/12/73
id doaj-796b8f8ac43e4ec2843a792c93693529
record_format Article
spelling doaj-796b8f8ac43e4ec2843a792c936935292020-11-25T01:58:30ZengBMCBMC Neuroscience1471-22022011-07-011217310.1186/1471-2202-12-73Differences in cortical response to acupressure and electroacupuncture stimuliVangel Mark GKettner Norman WNapadow VitalyWitzel ThomasHämäläinen Matti SDhond Rupali P<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>FMRI studies focus on sub-cortical effects of acupuncture stimuli. The purpose of this study was to assess changes in primary somatosensory (S1) activity over the course of different types of acupuncture stimulation. We used whole head magnetoencephalography (MEG) to map S1 brain response during 15 minutes of electroacupuncture (EA) and acupressure (AP). We further assessed how brain response changed during the course of stimulation.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Evoked brain response to EA differed from AP in its temporal dynamics by showing clear contralateral M20/M30 peaks while the latter demonstrated temporal dispersion. Both EA and AP demonstrated significantly decreased response amplitudes following five minutes of stimulation. However, the latency of these decreases were earlier in EA (~30 ms post-stimulus) than AP (> 100 ms). Time-frequency responses demonstrated early onset, event related synchronization (ERS), within the gamma band at ~70-130 ms and the theta band at ~50-200 ms post-stimulus. A prolonged event related desynchronization (ERD) of alpha and beta power occurred at ~100-300 ms post-stimulus. There was decreased beta ERD at ~100-300 ms over the course of EA, but not AP.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Both EA and AP demonstrated conditioning of SI response. In conjunction with their subcortical effects on endogenous pain regulation, these therapies show potential for affecting S1 processing and possibly altering maladaptive neuroplasticity. Thus, further investigation in neuropathic populations is needed.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2202/12/73
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Vangel Mark G
Kettner Norman W
Napadow Vitaly
Witzel Thomas
Hämäläinen Matti S
Dhond Rupali P
spellingShingle Vangel Mark G
Kettner Norman W
Napadow Vitaly
Witzel Thomas
Hämäläinen Matti S
Dhond Rupali P
Differences in cortical response to acupressure and electroacupuncture stimuli
BMC Neuroscience
author_facet Vangel Mark G
Kettner Norman W
Napadow Vitaly
Witzel Thomas
Hämäläinen Matti S
Dhond Rupali P
author_sort Vangel Mark G
title Differences in cortical response to acupressure and electroacupuncture stimuli
title_short Differences in cortical response to acupressure and electroacupuncture stimuli
title_full Differences in cortical response to acupressure and electroacupuncture stimuli
title_fullStr Differences in cortical response to acupressure and electroacupuncture stimuli
title_full_unstemmed Differences in cortical response to acupressure and electroacupuncture stimuli
title_sort differences in cortical response to acupressure and electroacupuncture stimuli
publisher BMC
series BMC Neuroscience
issn 1471-2202
publishDate 2011-07-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>FMRI studies focus on sub-cortical effects of acupuncture stimuli. The purpose of this study was to assess changes in primary somatosensory (S1) activity over the course of different types of acupuncture stimulation. We used whole head magnetoencephalography (MEG) to map S1 brain response during 15 minutes of electroacupuncture (EA) and acupressure (AP). We further assessed how brain response changed during the course of stimulation.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Evoked brain response to EA differed from AP in its temporal dynamics by showing clear contralateral M20/M30 peaks while the latter demonstrated temporal dispersion. Both EA and AP demonstrated significantly decreased response amplitudes following five minutes of stimulation. However, the latency of these decreases were earlier in EA (~30 ms post-stimulus) than AP (> 100 ms). Time-frequency responses demonstrated early onset, event related synchronization (ERS), within the gamma band at ~70-130 ms and the theta band at ~50-200 ms post-stimulus. A prolonged event related desynchronization (ERD) of alpha and beta power occurred at ~100-300 ms post-stimulus. There was decreased beta ERD at ~100-300 ms over the course of EA, but not AP.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Both EA and AP demonstrated conditioning of SI response. In conjunction with their subcortical effects on endogenous pain regulation, these therapies show potential for affecting S1 processing and possibly altering maladaptive neuroplasticity. Thus, further investigation in neuropathic populations is needed.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2202/12/73
work_keys_str_mv AT vangelmarkg differencesincorticalresponsetoacupressureandelectroacupuncturestimuli
AT kettnernormanw differencesincorticalresponsetoacupressureandelectroacupuncturestimuli
AT napadowvitaly differencesincorticalresponsetoacupressureandelectroacupuncturestimuli
AT witzelthomas differencesincorticalresponsetoacupressureandelectroacupuncturestimuli
AT hamalainenmattis differencesincorticalresponsetoacupressureandelectroacupuncturestimuli
AT dhondrupalip differencesincorticalresponsetoacupressureandelectroacupuncturestimuli
_version_ 1724969314044346368