Effect of graphic cigarette warnings on smoking intentions in young adults.

INTRODUCTION:Graphic warnings (GWs) on cigarette packs are widely used internationally and perhaps will be in the US but their impact is not well understood. This study tested support for competing hypotheses in different subgroups of young adults defined by their history of cigarette smoking and in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hart Blanton, Leslie B Snyder, Erin Strauts, Joy G Larson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4012950?pdf=render
id doaj-79cf3dcb70234de19f0d374c489e24d4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-79cf3dcb70234de19f0d374c489e24d42020-11-25T02:45:36ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-0195e9631510.1371/journal.pone.0096315Effect of graphic cigarette warnings on smoking intentions in young adults.Hart BlantonLeslie B SnyderErin StrautsJoy G LarsonINTRODUCTION:Graphic warnings (GWs) on cigarette packs are widely used internationally and perhaps will be in the US but their impact is not well understood. This study tested support for competing hypotheses in different subgroups of young adults defined by their history of cigarette smoking and individual difference variables (e.g., psychological reactance). One hypothesis predicted adaptive responding (GWs would lower smoking-related intentions) and another predicted defensive responding (GWs would raise smoking-related intentions). METHODS:Participants were an online sample of 1,169 Americans ages 18-24, who were randomly assigned either to view nine GWs designed by the FDA or to a no-label control. Both the intention to smoke in the future and the intention to quit smoking (among smokers) were assessed before and after message exposure. RESULTS:GWs lowered intention to smoke in the future among those with a moderate lifetime smoking history (between 1 and 100 cigarettes), and they increased intention to quit smoking among those with a heavy lifetime smoking history (more than 100 cigarettes). Both effects were limited to individuals who had smoked in some but not all of the prior 30 days (i.e., occasional smokers). No evidence of defensive "boomerang effects" on intention was observed in any subgroup. CONCLUSION:Graphic warnings can reduce interest in smoking among occasional smokers, a finding that supports the adaptive-change hypothesis. GWs that target occasional smokers might be more effective at reducing cigarette smoking in young adults.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4012950?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hart Blanton
Leslie B Snyder
Erin Strauts
Joy G Larson
spellingShingle Hart Blanton
Leslie B Snyder
Erin Strauts
Joy G Larson
Effect of graphic cigarette warnings on smoking intentions in young adults.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Hart Blanton
Leslie B Snyder
Erin Strauts
Joy G Larson
author_sort Hart Blanton
title Effect of graphic cigarette warnings on smoking intentions in young adults.
title_short Effect of graphic cigarette warnings on smoking intentions in young adults.
title_full Effect of graphic cigarette warnings on smoking intentions in young adults.
title_fullStr Effect of graphic cigarette warnings on smoking intentions in young adults.
title_full_unstemmed Effect of graphic cigarette warnings on smoking intentions in young adults.
title_sort effect of graphic cigarette warnings on smoking intentions in young adults.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2014-01-01
description INTRODUCTION:Graphic warnings (GWs) on cigarette packs are widely used internationally and perhaps will be in the US but their impact is not well understood. This study tested support for competing hypotheses in different subgroups of young adults defined by their history of cigarette smoking and individual difference variables (e.g., psychological reactance). One hypothesis predicted adaptive responding (GWs would lower smoking-related intentions) and another predicted defensive responding (GWs would raise smoking-related intentions). METHODS:Participants were an online sample of 1,169 Americans ages 18-24, who were randomly assigned either to view nine GWs designed by the FDA or to a no-label control. Both the intention to smoke in the future and the intention to quit smoking (among smokers) were assessed before and after message exposure. RESULTS:GWs lowered intention to smoke in the future among those with a moderate lifetime smoking history (between 1 and 100 cigarettes), and they increased intention to quit smoking among those with a heavy lifetime smoking history (more than 100 cigarettes). Both effects were limited to individuals who had smoked in some but not all of the prior 30 days (i.e., occasional smokers). No evidence of defensive "boomerang effects" on intention was observed in any subgroup. CONCLUSION:Graphic warnings can reduce interest in smoking among occasional smokers, a finding that supports the adaptive-change hypothesis. GWs that target occasional smokers might be more effective at reducing cigarette smoking in young adults.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4012950?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT hartblanton effectofgraphiccigarettewarningsonsmokingintentionsinyoungadults
AT lesliebsnyder effectofgraphiccigarettewarningsonsmokingintentionsinyoungadults
AT erinstrauts effectofgraphiccigarettewarningsonsmokingintentionsinyoungadults
AT joyglarson effectofgraphiccigarettewarningsonsmokingintentionsinyoungadults
_version_ 1724761643084152832