Techniques and Rules of Ineffability in the Dionysian Corpus

Is the Dionysian God, or an experience of the Dionysian God, absolutely ineffable? Does the Dionysian corpus assert or perform such ineffability? This paper will argue that the answer to each of these questions is no. The Dionysian God is known hyper-nous as the hyper-ousia cause of all. And the Dio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Knepper Timothy D.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 2014-06-01
Series:Studia Humana
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.2478/sh-2014-0006
id doaj-7a11cf65beeb4f40b6b2133a5e0a04a4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7a11cf65beeb4f40b6b2133a5e0a04a42021-10-02T17:49:34ZengSciendoStudia Humana2299-05182014-06-013233110.2478/sh-2014-0006sh-2014-0006Techniques and Rules of Ineffability in the Dionysian CorpusKnepper Timothy D.0Associate Professor of Philosophy, Drake University, USAIs the Dionysian God, or an experience of the Dionysian God, absolutely ineffable? Does the Dionysian corpus assert or perform such ineffability? This paper will argue that the answer to each of these questions is no. The Dionysian God is known hyper-nous as the hyper-ousia cause of all. And the Dionysian corpus unambiguously refers to, asserts of, and metaphorizes about this God just so. In arguing these points, this paper will call upon both the speech act theory of John Searle and the metaphor theory of George Lakoff and Mark Johnson. More particularly, it will look to Searle’s rules of reference and predication and conditions of illocutionary acts, as well as Lakoff and Johnson’s schematization of metaphor gestalt and entailment to show how Dionysian expressions of inexpressibility are rule-governed and the Dionysian God is thereby (relatively) effable.https://doi.org/10.2478/sh-2014-0006dionysius areopagitesspeech actsorthodox christianity
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Knepper Timothy D.
spellingShingle Knepper Timothy D.
Techniques and Rules of Ineffability in the Dionysian Corpus
Studia Humana
dionysius areopagites
speech acts
orthodox christianity
author_facet Knepper Timothy D.
author_sort Knepper Timothy D.
title Techniques and Rules of Ineffability in the Dionysian Corpus
title_short Techniques and Rules of Ineffability in the Dionysian Corpus
title_full Techniques and Rules of Ineffability in the Dionysian Corpus
title_fullStr Techniques and Rules of Ineffability in the Dionysian Corpus
title_full_unstemmed Techniques and Rules of Ineffability in the Dionysian Corpus
title_sort techniques and rules of ineffability in the dionysian corpus
publisher Sciendo
series Studia Humana
issn 2299-0518
publishDate 2014-06-01
description Is the Dionysian God, or an experience of the Dionysian God, absolutely ineffable? Does the Dionysian corpus assert or perform such ineffability? This paper will argue that the answer to each of these questions is no. The Dionysian God is known hyper-nous as the hyper-ousia cause of all. And the Dionysian corpus unambiguously refers to, asserts of, and metaphorizes about this God just so. In arguing these points, this paper will call upon both the speech act theory of John Searle and the metaphor theory of George Lakoff and Mark Johnson. More particularly, it will look to Searle’s rules of reference and predication and conditions of illocutionary acts, as well as Lakoff and Johnson’s schematization of metaphor gestalt and entailment to show how Dionysian expressions of inexpressibility are rule-governed and the Dionysian God is thereby (relatively) effable.
topic dionysius areopagites
speech acts
orthodox christianity
url https://doi.org/10.2478/sh-2014-0006
work_keys_str_mv AT kneppertimothyd techniquesandrulesofineffabilityinthedionysiancorpus
_version_ 1716850397485727744