Trochanteric osteotomy versus posterolateral approach: function the first year post surgery. A pilot study

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Although no prospective studies have compared functional results of trochanteric osteotomy and a non-trochanteric approach, most surgeons feel that trochanteric osteotomy is outdated in simple hip arthroplasty. Reasons not to perform...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: van Biezen Frans C, Reijman Max, van der Grinten Margot, Verhaar Jan AN
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2011-06-01
Series:BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/12/138
id doaj-7a5450a3ce0142e88b9c0c875eded69e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7a5450a3ce0142e88b9c0c875eded69e2020-11-25T00:26:47ZengBMCBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders1471-24742011-06-0112113810.1186/1471-2474-12-138Trochanteric osteotomy versus posterolateral approach: function the first year post surgery. A pilot studyvan Biezen Frans CReijman Maxvan der Grinten MargotVerhaar Jan AN<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Although no prospective studies have compared functional results of trochanteric osteotomy and a non-trochanteric approach, most surgeons feel that trochanteric osteotomy is outdated in simple hip arthroplasty. Reasons not to perform an osteotomy include the fear of longer rehabilitation and worse (final) functional outcome.</p> <p>Method</p> <p>This prospective study examines differences in rehabilitation between posterolateral and trochanteric approach one year post-surgery using questionnaires (WOMAC, SF-36, HHS) and functional tests (walking, climbing stairs, rising from sitting, and strength tests). Of the 109 patients 24 had a trochanteric osteotomy: the selected approach was based on the surgeon's preference. The trochanteric osteotomy group included more patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip. Before the start of the study no power analysis was performed.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Data from the questionnaires showed no significant differences between the two groups at 3, 6 and 12-months follow-up. At 3-months follow-up patients in the trochanteric osteotomy group scored lower on the functional tests. This difference had disappeared at 6 and 12-months follow-up, except for abduction force which remained lower in the trochanteric osteotomy group in patients with a non union of the TO.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>For simple hip arthroplasty an approach without osteotomy seems a logical choice. Although the power of this study is low, in experienced hands trochanteric osteotomy seems to give good functional results at 6-12 months post surgery if trochanteric union is obtained. Therefore, one should not hesitate to perform an osteotomy in difficult cases.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/12/138
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author van Biezen Frans C
Reijman Max
van der Grinten Margot
Verhaar Jan AN
spellingShingle van Biezen Frans C
Reijman Max
van der Grinten Margot
Verhaar Jan AN
Trochanteric osteotomy versus posterolateral approach: function the first year post surgery. A pilot study
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
author_facet van Biezen Frans C
Reijman Max
van der Grinten Margot
Verhaar Jan AN
author_sort van Biezen Frans C
title Trochanteric osteotomy versus posterolateral approach: function the first year post surgery. A pilot study
title_short Trochanteric osteotomy versus posterolateral approach: function the first year post surgery. A pilot study
title_full Trochanteric osteotomy versus posterolateral approach: function the first year post surgery. A pilot study
title_fullStr Trochanteric osteotomy versus posterolateral approach: function the first year post surgery. A pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Trochanteric osteotomy versus posterolateral approach: function the first year post surgery. A pilot study
title_sort trochanteric osteotomy versus posterolateral approach: function the first year post surgery. a pilot study
publisher BMC
series BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
issn 1471-2474
publishDate 2011-06-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Although no prospective studies have compared functional results of trochanteric osteotomy and a non-trochanteric approach, most surgeons feel that trochanteric osteotomy is outdated in simple hip arthroplasty. Reasons not to perform an osteotomy include the fear of longer rehabilitation and worse (final) functional outcome.</p> <p>Method</p> <p>This prospective study examines differences in rehabilitation between posterolateral and trochanteric approach one year post-surgery using questionnaires (WOMAC, SF-36, HHS) and functional tests (walking, climbing stairs, rising from sitting, and strength tests). Of the 109 patients 24 had a trochanteric osteotomy: the selected approach was based on the surgeon's preference. The trochanteric osteotomy group included more patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip. Before the start of the study no power analysis was performed.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Data from the questionnaires showed no significant differences between the two groups at 3, 6 and 12-months follow-up. At 3-months follow-up patients in the trochanteric osteotomy group scored lower on the functional tests. This difference had disappeared at 6 and 12-months follow-up, except for abduction force which remained lower in the trochanteric osteotomy group in patients with a non union of the TO.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>For simple hip arthroplasty an approach without osteotomy seems a logical choice. Although the power of this study is low, in experienced hands trochanteric osteotomy seems to give good functional results at 6-12 months post surgery if trochanteric union is obtained. Therefore, one should not hesitate to perform an osteotomy in difficult cases.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/12/138
work_keys_str_mv AT vanbiezenfransc trochantericosteotomyversusposterolateralapproachfunctionthefirstyearpostsurgeryapilotstudy
AT reijmanmax trochantericosteotomyversusposterolateralapproachfunctionthefirstyearpostsurgeryapilotstudy
AT vandergrintenmargot trochantericosteotomyversusposterolateralapproachfunctionthefirstyearpostsurgeryapilotstudy
AT verhaarjanan trochantericosteotomyversusposterolateralapproachfunctionthefirstyearpostsurgeryapilotstudy
_version_ 1725342623207522304