Conceptualising and operationalising resilience in older adults

• Main Authors: Theodore D Cosco, Almar Kok, Andrew Wister, Kenneth Howse
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2019-01-01
• Series: Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine
• Subjects: resilience; conceptualisation; operationalisation; older adults; methods
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21642850.2019.1593845

Context: As a result of increases in life expectancy and decreases in fertility, the proportion of the population entering later life has increased dramatically in recent decades. When faced with age-related challenges, some older adults respond more positively to adversity than would be expected given the level of adversity that they have experienced, demonstrating ‘resilience’. Objectives: Having a clear conceptual framework for resilience is a prerequisite to operationalising resilience in a research context. Methods: Here we compare and contrast several approaches to the operationalisation of resilience: psychometric-driven and data-driven (variable-centred and individual-centred) methods. Results: Psychometric-driven methods involve the administration of established questionnaires aimed at quantifying resilience. Data-driven techniques use statistical procedures to examine and/or operationalise resilience and can be broadly categorised into variable-centred methods, i.e. interaction and residuals, and individual-centred methods, i.e. categorical and latent class. Conclusions: The specific question(s) driving the research and the nature of the variables a researcher intends to use in their adversity-outcome dyad will largely dictate which methods are more (or less) appropriate in that circumstance. A measured approach to the ways in which resilience is investigated is warranted in order to facilitate the most useful application of this burgeoning field of research.