Contextualist Answers to the Challenge from Disagreement

In this short paper I survey recent contextualist answers to the challenge from disagreement raised by contemporary relativists. After making the challenge vivid by means of a working example, I specify the notion of disagreement lying at the heart of the challenge. The answers are grouped in three...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Dan Zeman
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Published:	Firenze University Press 2017-08-01
Series:	Phenomenology and Mind
Subjects:	contextualism disagreement disagreement in attitude pragmatic disagreement
Online Access:	https://oaj.fupress.net/index.php/pam/article/view/7266

id	doaj-7aa4f2a5eb3540069dff6d9ca805ea86
record_format	Article
spelling	doaj-7aa4f2a5eb3540069dff6d9ca805ea862020-11-25T03:58:34ZengFirenze University PressPhenomenology and Mind2280-78532239-40282017-08-011210.13128/Phe_Mi-2110617468Contextualist Answers to the Challenge from DisagreementDan Zeman0University of the Basque Country In this short paper I survey recent contextualist answers to the challenge from disagreement raised by contemporary relativists. After making the challenge vivid by means of a working example, I specify the notion of disagreement lying at the heart of the challenge. The answers are grouped in three categories, the first characterized by rejecting the intuition of disagreement in certain cases, the second by conceiving disagreement as a clash of non-cognitive attitudes and the third by relegating disagreement at the pragmatic level. For each category I present several important variants and raise some (general) criticisms. The paper is meant to offer a quick introduction to the current contextualist literature on disagreement and thus a useful tool for further research. https://oaj.fupress.net/index.php/pam/article/view/7266contextualismdisagreementdisagreement in attitudepragmatic disagreement
collection	DOAJ
language	English
format	Article
sources	DOAJ
author	Dan Zeman
spellingShingle	Dan Zeman Contextualist Answers to the Challenge from Disagreement Phenomenology and Mind contextualism disagreement disagreement in attitude pragmatic disagreement
author_facet	Dan Zeman
author_sort	Dan Zeman
title	Contextualist Answers to the Challenge from Disagreement
title_short	Contextualist Answers to the Challenge from Disagreement
title_full	Contextualist Answers to the Challenge from Disagreement
title_fullStr	Contextualist Answers to the Challenge from Disagreement
title_full_unstemmed	Contextualist Answers to the Challenge from Disagreement
title_sort	contextualist answers to the challenge from disagreement
publisher	Firenze University Press
series	Phenomenology and Mind
issn	2280-7853 2239-4028
publishDate	2017-08-01
description	In this short paper I survey recent contextualist answers to the challenge from disagreement raised by contemporary relativists. After making the challenge vivid by means of a working example, I specify the notion of disagreement lying at the heart of the challenge. The answers are grouped in three categories, the first characterized by rejecting the intuition of disagreement in certain cases, the second by conceiving disagreement as a clash of non-cognitive attitudes and the third by relegating disagreement at the pragmatic level. For each category I present several important variants and raise some (general) criticisms. The paper is meant to offer a quick introduction to the current contextualist literature on disagreement and thus a useful tool for further research.
topic	contextualism disagreement disagreement in attitude pragmatic disagreement
url	https://oaj.fupress.net/index.php/pam/article/view/7266
work_keys_str_mv	AT danzeman contextualistanswerstothechallengefromdisagreement
_version_	1724456397571096576

Contextualist Answers to the Challenge from Disagreement

Similar Items