Governing Carbon Dioxide Removal in the UK: Lessons Learned and Challenges Ahead

This Policy Brief reviews the experience of the UK in developing principles for the governance of carbon dioxide removal (CDR) at scale. Early discussions on CDR governance took place in two separate and somewhat disjointed policy domains: forestry, on the one hand, and R&D support for novel...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Javier Lezaun, Peter Healey, Tim Kruger, Stephen M. Smith
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-08-01
Series:Frontiers in Climate
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fclim.2021.673859/full
id doaj-7aab924352bc4dd5b656f86b7769fbef
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7aab924352bc4dd5b656f86b7769fbef2021-08-10T06:33:46ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Climate2624-95532021-08-01310.3389/fclim.2021.673859673859Governing Carbon Dioxide Removal in the UK: Lessons Learned and Challenges AheadJavier Lezaun0Peter Healey1Tim Kruger2Stephen M. Smith3Institute for Science, Innovation and Society, School of Anthropology and Museum Ethnography, University of Oxford, Oxford, United KingdomInstitute for Science, Innovation and Society, School of Anthropology and Museum Ethnography, University of Oxford, Oxford, United KingdomOxford Martin School, University of Oxford, Oxford, United KingdomSmith School of Enterprise and the Environment, University of Oxford, Oxford, United KingdomThis Policy Brief reviews the experience of the UK in developing principles for the governance of carbon dioxide removal (CDR) at scale. Early discussions on CDR governance took place in two separate and somewhat disjointed policy domains: forestry, on the one hand, and R&D support for novel “geoengineering” technologies, on the other. The adoption by the UK government of a 2050 “net zero” target is forcing an integration of these disparate perspectives, and should lead to a more explicit articulation of the role CDR is expected to play in UK climate strategy. This need for clarification is revealing some of underlying tensions and divisions in public views on CDR, particularly when it comes to forms of capture and sequestration deemed to be “non-natural.” We propose some principles to ensure that the development and deployment of carbon dioxide removal at scale strengthens a commitment to ambitious climate change mitigation and can thus enjoy broad public support.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fclim.2021.673859/fullcarbon dioxide removalgovernancenet zeronegative emission technologiesgeoengineering
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Javier Lezaun
Peter Healey
Tim Kruger
Stephen M. Smith
spellingShingle Javier Lezaun
Peter Healey
Tim Kruger
Stephen M. Smith
Governing Carbon Dioxide Removal in the UK: Lessons Learned and Challenges Ahead
Frontiers in Climate
carbon dioxide removal
governance
net zero
negative emission technologies
geoengineering
author_facet Javier Lezaun
Peter Healey
Tim Kruger
Stephen M. Smith
author_sort Javier Lezaun
title Governing Carbon Dioxide Removal in the UK: Lessons Learned and Challenges Ahead
title_short Governing Carbon Dioxide Removal in the UK: Lessons Learned and Challenges Ahead
title_full Governing Carbon Dioxide Removal in the UK: Lessons Learned and Challenges Ahead
title_fullStr Governing Carbon Dioxide Removal in the UK: Lessons Learned and Challenges Ahead
title_full_unstemmed Governing Carbon Dioxide Removal in the UK: Lessons Learned and Challenges Ahead
title_sort governing carbon dioxide removal in the uk: lessons learned and challenges ahead
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Climate
issn 2624-9553
publishDate 2021-08-01
description This Policy Brief reviews the experience of the UK in developing principles for the governance of carbon dioxide removal (CDR) at scale. Early discussions on CDR governance took place in two separate and somewhat disjointed policy domains: forestry, on the one hand, and R&D support for novel “geoengineering” technologies, on the other. The adoption by the UK government of a 2050 “net zero” target is forcing an integration of these disparate perspectives, and should lead to a more explicit articulation of the role CDR is expected to play in UK climate strategy. This need for clarification is revealing some of underlying tensions and divisions in public views on CDR, particularly when it comes to forms of capture and sequestration deemed to be “non-natural.” We propose some principles to ensure that the development and deployment of carbon dioxide removal at scale strengthens a commitment to ambitious climate change mitigation and can thus enjoy broad public support.
topic carbon dioxide removal
governance
net zero
negative emission technologies
geoengineering
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fclim.2021.673859/full
work_keys_str_mv AT javierlezaun governingcarbondioxideremovalintheuklessonslearnedandchallengesahead
AT peterhealey governingcarbondioxideremovalintheuklessonslearnedandchallengesahead
AT timkruger governingcarbondioxideremovalintheuklessonslearnedandchallengesahead
AT stephenmsmith governingcarbondioxideremovalintheuklessonslearnedandchallengesahead
_version_ 1721212681056157696