Is Computed Tomography Necessary for Diagnostic Workup in Displaced Pediatric Medial Epicondyle Fractures?

This study aimed to compare the treatment outcomes and complications between operatively and nonoperatively treated medial epicondyle fractures with displacement of >5 mm as accurately measured on three-dimensional computed tomography (3D CT). We retrospectively reviewed 77 patients who had isola...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sungmin Kim, Hyun Woo Kim, Kun-Bo Park, Kee-Bum Hong, Hoon Park
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-11-01
Series:Diagnostics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/10/11/957
id doaj-7aafbe232c7c4611b626bb8641b23d3f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7aafbe232c7c4611b626bb8641b23d3f2020-11-25T04:09:09ZengMDPI AGDiagnostics2075-44182020-11-011095795710.3390/diagnostics10110957Is Computed Tomography Necessary for Diagnostic Workup in Displaced Pediatric Medial Epicondyle Fractures?Sungmin Kim0Hyun Woo Kim1Kun-Bo Park2Kee-Bum Hong3Hoon Park4Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chonnam National University Hospital and Medical School, College of Medicine, Gwangju 61469, KoreaDivision of Pediatric Orthopaedic Surgery, Severance Children’s Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, KoreaDivision of Pediatric Orthopaedic Surgery, Severance Children’s Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, KoreaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 06273, KoreaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 06273, KoreaThis study aimed to compare the treatment outcomes and complications between operatively and nonoperatively treated medial epicondyle fractures with displacement of >5 mm as accurately measured on three-dimensional computed tomography (3D CT). We retrospectively reviewed 77 patients who had isolated medial epicondylar fractures with displacement of >5 mm. The mean age at injury was 11.4 years. Patients were assigned to one of two groups: 21 patients treated nonoperatively and 56 patients treated surgically. Additionally, patients treated operatively were divided into two subgroups according to fixation method; 31 patients underwent internal fixation with K-wires and 25 patients underwent internal fixation with a screw. Radiological and functional outcomes were compared among the three groups. Although the bony union rate was significantly higher in patients treated operatively compared to patients treated non-operatively (96.4% vs. 23.8%, <i>p</i> < 0.001), there were no significant differences in functional outcomes between the two groups. In the nonoperative group, three patients underwent osteosynthesis for symptomatic nonunion. There were no significant differences in radiological and functional outcomes between the two subgroups divided by fixation method. In a pediatric medial epicondylar fracture with a displacement of >5 mm as accurately measured on 3D CT, despite the difference in union rate, there was no difference in functional outcomes between operative and nonoperative treatment. Performing CT only to measure the fracture displacement in obviously displaced medial epicondylar fracture is not considered as a part of the “necessary” diagnostic workups.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/10/11/957medial epicondylefracturecomputed tomography
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sungmin Kim
Hyun Woo Kim
Kun-Bo Park
Kee-Bum Hong
Hoon Park
spellingShingle Sungmin Kim
Hyun Woo Kim
Kun-Bo Park
Kee-Bum Hong
Hoon Park
Is Computed Tomography Necessary for Diagnostic Workup in Displaced Pediatric Medial Epicondyle Fractures?
Diagnostics
medial epicondyle
fracture
computed tomography
author_facet Sungmin Kim
Hyun Woo Kim
Kun-Bo Park
Kee-Bum Hong
Hoon Park
author_sort Sungmin Kim
title Is Computed Tomography Necessary for Diagnostic Workup in Displaced Pediatric Medial Epicondyle Fractures?
title_short Is Computed Tomography Necessary for Diagnostic Workup in Displaced Pediatric Medial Epicondyle Fractures?
title_full Is Computed Tomography Necessary for Diagnostic Workup in Displaced Pediatric Medial Epicondyle Fractures?
title_fullStr Is Computed Tomography Necessary for Diagnostic Workup in Displaced Pediatric Medial Epicondyle Fractures?
title_full_unstemmed Is Computed Tomography Necessary for Diagnostic Workup in Displaced Pediatric Medial Epicondyle Fractures?
title_sort is computed tomography necessary for diagnostic workup in displaced pediatric medial epicondyle fractures?
publisher MDPI AG
series Diagnostics
issn 2075-4418
publishDate 2020-11-01
description This study aimed to compare the treatment outcomes and complications between operatively and nonoperatively treated medial epicondyle fractures with displacement of >5 mm as accurately measured on three-dimensional computed tomography (3D CT). We retrospectively reviewed 77 patients who had isolated medial epicondylar fractures with displacement of >5 mm. The mean age at injury was 11.4 years. Patients were assigned to one of two groups: 21 patients treated nonoperatively and 56 patients treated surgically. Additionally, patients treated operatively were divided into two subgroups according to fixation method; 31 patients underwent internal fixation with K-wires and 25 patients underwent internal fixation with a screw. Radiological and functional outcomes were compared among the three groups. Although the bony union rate was significantly higher in patients treated operatively compared to patients treated non-operatively (96.4% vs. 23.8%, <i>p</i> < 0.001), there were no significant differences in functional outcomes between the two groups. In the nonoperative group, three patients underwent osteosynthesis for symptomatic nonunion. There were no significant differences in radiological and functional outcomes between the two subgroups divided by fixation method. In a pediatric medial epicondylar fracture with a displacement of >5 mm as accurately measured on 3D CT, despite the difference in union rate, there was no difference in functional outcomes between operative and nonoperative treatment. Performing CT only to measure the fracture displacement in obviously displaced medial epicondylar fracture is not considered as a part of the “necessary” diagnostic workups.
topic medial epicondyle
fracture
computed tomography
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/10/11/957
work_keys_str_mv AT sungminkim iscomputedtomographynecessaryfordiagnosticworkupindisplacedpediatricmedialepicondylefractures
AT hyunwookim iscomputedtomographynecessaryfordiagnosticworkupindisplacedpediatricmedialepicondylefractures
AT kunbopark iscomputedtomographynecessaryfordiagnosticworkupindisplacedpediatricmedialepicondylefractures
AT keebumhong iscomputedtomographynecessaryfordiagnosticworkupindisplacedpediatricmedialepicondylefractures
AT hoonpark iscomputedtomographynecessaryfordiagnosticworkupindisplacedpediatricmedialepicondylefractures
_version_ 1724423073192476672