A comparative evaluation of electronic and radiographic determination of root canal length in primary teeth: An in vitro study

Aims: The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the root canal length determination by Electronic apex locator (EAL) (Raypex 5) and conventional radiography, and then compare them with the actual measurements obtained by direct visualization. Settings and Design: This study was conducted at...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Iyer Satishkumar Krishnan, Sheela Sreedharan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2012-01-01
Series:Contemporary Clinical Dentistry
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.contempclindent.org/article.asp?issn=0976-237X;year=2012;volume=3;issue=4;spage=416;epage=420;aulast=Krishnan
id doaj-7acba51f31384913a4ce5ae2614315ad
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7acba51f31384913a4ce5ae2614315ad2020-11-24T23:38:43ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsContemporary Clinical Dentistry0976-237X0976-23612012-01-013441642010.4103/0976-237X.107430A comparative evaluation of electronic and radiographic determination of root canal length in primary teeth: An in vitro studyIyer Satishkumar KrishnanSheela SreedharanAims: The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the root canal length determination by Electronic apex locator (EAL) (Raypex 5) and conventional radiography, and then compare them with the actual measurements obtained by direct visualization. Settings and Design: This study was conducted at the Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Government Dental College, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India. Subjects and Methods: One hundred single rooted primary teeth extracted due to extensive caries, trauma, serial extraction or unwillingness of the parent to save the teeth were selected. The teeth were numbered and root canal length was determined using the visual, electronic and the radiographic methods. The actual, electronic and the radiographic measurements were recorded. Statistical Analysis Used: Data were analyzed using Intraclass correlation test and linear regression analysis. Results: The accuracy of EAL and radiographic methods were 92% and 72%, respectively within + 0.5 mm. Both the electronic and conventional radiographic methods showed a high correlation and agreement (ICC intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.99 and 0.98 respectively) with the actual measurements. Conclusions: EALs proved to be more accurate in determining the root canal length than the radiographic method.http://www.contempclindent.org/article.asp?issn=0976-237X;year=2012;volume=3;issue=4;spage=416;epage=420;aulast=KrishnanElectronic apex locatorsintraoral periapical radiographyprimary teethroot canal length determination
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Iyer Satishkumar Krishnan
Sheela Sreedharan
spellingShingle Iyer Satishkumar Krishnan
Sheela Sreedharan
A comparative evaluation of electronic and radiographic determination of root canal length in primary teeth: An in vitro study
Contemporary Clinical Dentistry
Electronic apex locators
intraoral periapical radiography
primary teeth
root canal length determination
author_facet Iyer Satishkumar Krishnan
Sheela Sreedharan
author_sort Iyer Satishkumar Krishnan
title A comparative evaluation of electronic and radiographic determination of root canal length in primary teeth: An in vitro study
title_short A comparative evaluation of electronic and radiographic determination of root canal length in primary teeth: An in vitro study
title_full A comparative evaluation of electronic and radiographic determination of root canal length in primary teeth: An in vitro study
title_fullStr A comparative evaluation of electronic and radiographic determination of root canal length in primary teeth: An in vitro study
title_full_unstemmed A comparative evaluation of electronic and radiographic determination of root canal length in primary teeth: An in vitro study
title_sort comparative evaluation of electronic and radiographic determination of root canal length in primary teeth: an in vitro study
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Contemporary Clinical Dentistry
issn 0976-237X
0976-2361
publishDate 2012-01-01
description Aims: The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the root canal length determination by Electronic apex locator (EAL) (Raypex 5) and conventional radiography, and then compare them with the actual measurements obtained by direct visualization. Settings and Design: This study was conducted at the Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Government Dental College, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India. Subjects and Methods: One hundred single rooted primary teeth extracted due to extensive caries, trauma, serial extraction or unwillingness of the parent to save the teeth were selected. The teeth were numbered and root canal length was determined using the visual, electronic and the radiographic methods. The actual, electronic and the radiographic measurements were recorded. Statistical Analysis Used: Data were analyzed using Intraclass correlation test and linear regression analysis. Results: The accuracy of EAL and radiographic methods were 92% and 72%, respectively within + 0.5 mm. Both the electronic and conventional radiographic methods showed a high correlation and agreement (ICC intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.99 and 0.98 respectively) with the actual measurements. Conclusions: EALs proved to be more accurate in determining the root canal length than the radiographic method.
topic Electronic apex locators
intraoral periapical radiography
primary teeth
root canal length determination
url http://www.contempclindent.org/article.asp?issn=0976-237X;year=2012;volume=3;issue=4;spage=416;epage=420;aulast=Krishnan
work_keys_str_mv AT iyersatishkumarkrishnan acomparativeevaluationofelectronicandradiographicdeterminationofrootcanallengthinprimaryteethaninvitrostudy
AT sheelasreedharan acomparativeevaluationofelectronicandradiographicdeterminationofrootcanallengthinprimaryteethaninvitrostudy
AT iyersatishkumarkrishnan comparativeevaluationofelectronicandradiographicdeterminationofrootcanallengthinprimaryteethaninvitrostudy
AT sheelasreedharan comparativeevaluationofelectronicandradiographicdeterminationofrootcanallengthinprimaryteethaninvitrostudy
_version_ 1725516175193931776