Laparoscopic reconstruction of iatrogenic-induced lower ureteric strictures: Does timing of repair influence the outcome?

Context: Influence of timing of repair on outcome following laparoscopic reconstruction of lower ureteric strictures Aims: To assess the influence of timing of repair on outcome following laparoscopic reconstruction of lower ureteric strictures in our adult patient population. Settings and Design:...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: George P Abraham, Krishanu Das, Krishnamohan Ramaswami, Datson P George, Jisha J Abraham, Thomas Thachil
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2011-01-01
Series:Indian Journal of Urology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.indianjurol.com/article.asp?issn=0970-1591;year=2011;volume=27;issue=4;spage=465;epage=469;aulast=Abraham
id doaj-7ad05aef305b4a379aedcf2194154f64
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7ad05aef305b4a379aedcf2194154f642020-11-24T22:00:44ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Urology0970-15911998-38242011-01-0127446546910.4103/0970-1591.91433Laparoscopic reconstruction of iatrogenic-induced lower ureteric strictures: Does timing of repair influence the outcome?George P AbrahamKrishanu DasKrishnamohan RamaswamiDatson P GeorgeJisha J AbrahamThomas ThachilContext: Influence of timing of repair on outcome following laparoscopic reconstruction of lower ureteric strictures Aims: To assess the influence of timing of repair on outcome following laparoscopic reconstruction of lower ureteric strictures in our adult patient population. Settings and Design: Single surgeon operative experience in two institutes. Retrospective analysis. Materials and Methods: All patients were worked up in detail. All patients underwent cystoscopy and retrograde pyelography prior to laparoscopic approach. Patients were categorised into two groups: early repair (within seven days of inciting event) and delayed repair (after two weeks). Operative parameters and postoperative events were recorded. Postprocedure all patients were evaluated three monthly. Follow-up imaging was ordered at six months postoperatively. Improvement in renal function, resolution of hydronephrosis and unhindered drainage of contrast through the reconstructed unit on follow-up imaging was interpreted as a satisfactory outcome. Statistical Analysis Used: Mean, standard deviation, equal variance t test, Mann Whitney Z test, Aspin-Welch unequal variance t test. Results: Thirty-six patients (37 units, 36 unilateral and 1 simultaneous bilateral) underwent laparoscopic ureteral reconstruction of lower ureteric stricture following iatrogenic injury - 21 early repair (Group I) and 15 delayed repair (Group II). All patients were hemodynamically stable at presentation. Early repair was more technically demanding with increased operation duration. There was no difference in blood loss, operative complications, postoperative parameters, or longterm outcome. Conclusions: In hemodynamically stable patients, laparoscopic repair of iatrogenically induced lower ureteric strictures can be conveniently undertaken without undue delay from the inciting event. Compared to delayed repairs, the procedure is technically more demanding but morbidity incurred and outcome is at par.http://www.indianjurol.com/article.asp?issn=0970-1591;year=2011;volume=27;issue=4;spage=465;epage=469;aulast=AbrahamBoari flapiatrogeniclaparoscopyureteric strictureureteroneocystostomy
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author George P Abraham
Krishanu Das
Krishnamohan Ramaswami
Datson P George
Jisha J Abraham
Thomas Thachil
spellingShingle George P Abraham
Krishanu Das
Krishnamohan Ramaswami
Datson P George
Jisha J Abraham
Thomas Thachil
Laparoscopic reconstruction of iatrogenic-induced lower ureteric strictures: Does timing of repair influence the outcome?
Indian Journal of Urology
Boari flap
iatrogenic
laparoscopy
ureteric stricture
ureteroneocystostomy
author_facet George P Abraham
Krishanu Das
Krishnamohan Ramaswami
Datson P George
Jisha J Abraham
Thomas Thachil
author_sort George P Abraham
title Laparoscopic reconstruction of iatrogenic-induced lower ureteric strictures: Does timing of repair influence the outcome?
title_short Laparoscopic reconstruction of iatrogenic-induced lower ureteric strictures: Does timing of repair influence the outcome?
title_full Laparoscopic reconstruction of iatrogenic-induced lower ureteric strictures: Does timing of repair influence the outcome?
title_fullStr Laparoscopic reconstruction of iatrogenic-induced lower ureteric strictures: Does timing of repair influence the outcome?
title_full_unstemmed Laparoscopic reconstruction of iatrogenic-induced lower ureteric strictures: Does timing of repair influence the outcome?
title_sort laparoscopic reconstruction of iatrogenic-induced lower ureteric strictures: does timing of repair influence the outcome?
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Indian Journal of Urology
issn 0970-1591
1998-3824
publishDate 2011-01-01
description Context: Influence of timing of repair on outcome following laparoscopic reconstruction of lower ureteric strictures Aims: To assess the influence of timing of repair on outcome following laparoscopic reconstruction of lower ureteric strictures in our adult patient population. Settings and Design: Single surgeon operative experience in two institutes. Retrospective analysis. Materials and Methods: All patients were worked up in detail. All patients underwent cystoscopy and retrograde pyelography prior to laparoscopic approach. Patients were categorised into two groups: early repair (within seven days of inciting event) and delayed repair (after two weeks). Operative parameters and postoperative events were recorded. Postprocedure all patients were evaluated three monthly. Follow-up imaging was ordered at six months postoperatively. Improvement in renal function, resolution of hydronephrosis and unhindered drainage of contrast through the reconstructed unit on follow-up imaging was interpreted as a satisfactory outcome. Statistical Analysis Used: Mean, standard deviation, equal variance t test, Mann Whitney Z test, Aspin-Welch unequal variance t test. Results: Thirty-six patients (37 units, 36 unilateral and 1 simultaneous bilateral) underwent laparoscopic ureteral reconstruction of lower ureteric stricture following iatrogenic injury - 21 early repair (Group I) and 15 delayed repair (Group II). All patients were hemodynamically stable at presentation. Early repair was more technically demanding with increased operation duration. There was no difference in blood loss, operative complications, postoperative parameters, or longterm outcome. Conclusions: In hemodynamically stable patients, laparoscopic repair of iatrogenically induced lower ureteric strictures can be conveniently undertaken without undue delay from the inciting event. Compared to delayed repairs, the procedure is technically more demanding but morbidity incurred and outcome is at par.
topic Boari flap
iatrogenic
laparoscopy
ureteric stricture
ureteroneocystostomy
url http://www.indianjurol.com/article.asp?issn=0970-1591;year=2011;volume=27;issue=4;spage=465;epage=469;aulast=Abraham
work_keys_str_mv AT georgepabraham laparoscopicreconstructionofiatrogenicinducedloweruretericstricturesdoestimingofrepairinfluencetheoutcome
AT krishanudas laparoscopicreconstructionofiatrogenicinducedloweruretericstricturesdoestimingofrepairinfluencetheoutcome
AT krishnamohanramaswami laparoscopicreconstructionofiatrogenicinducedloweruretericstricturesdoestimingofrepairinfluencetheoutcome
AT datsonpgeorge laparoscopicreconstructionofiatrogenicinducedloweruretericstricturesdoestimingofrepairinfluencetheoutcome
AT jishajabraham laparoscopicreconstructionofiatrogenicinducedloweruretericstricturesdoestimingofrepairinfluencetheoutcome
AT thomasthachil laparoscopicreconstructionofiatrogenicinducedloweruretericstricturesdoestimingofrepairinfluencetheoutcome
_version_ 1725842888022032384