Legal Realism and Legal Positivism

American legal realism is commonly treated as a theory-pariah. The article exposes certain reasons explaining such a treatment. Generally, it seems that such an attitude is a result of many misunderstandings of realist aims and ambitions, some of which pertain to the theoretical status of legal real...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Adam Dyrda
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Centre for Philosophical Research 2018-04-01
Series:Avant: Journal of Philosophical-Interdisciplinary Vanguard
Subjects:
Online Access:http://avant.edu.pl/wp-content/uploads/Dyrda-Realizm-prawniczy.pdf
id doaj-7b08b5d0fa1e43b0954f7d9b0f7eb289
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7b08b5d0fa1e43b0954f7d9b0f7eb2892020-11-24T21:42:20ZengCentre for Philosophical ResearchAvant: Journal of Philosophical-Interdisciplinary Vanguard2082-75982082-67102018-04-0191476610.26913/90102018.0103.0004Legal Realism and Legal PositivismAdam Dyrda0Jagiellonian UniversityAmerican legal realism is commonly treated as a theory-pariah. The article exposes certain reasons explaining such a treatment. Generally, it seems that such an attitude is a result of many misunderstandings of realist aims and ambitions, some of which pertain to the theoretical status of legal realism and its relation to so called general jurisprudential theories, such as legal positivism. In the first part of the article I explain generally what these aims were and how one should see these relations. In the second part I briefly analyze B. Leiter’s famous claim that legal realism is conceptually dependent on hard legal positivism (as a general theory of law). The critique of this claim opens the possibility for some alternative understanding of legal realism.http://avant.edu.pl/wp-content/uploads/Dyrda-Realizm-prawniczy.pdflegal positivismAmerican legal realismlegal truismsgeneral theory of lawtheory of adjudicationBrian Leiter
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Adam Dyrda
spellingShingle Adam Dyrda
Legal Realism and Legal Positivism
Avant: Journal of Philosophical-Interdisciplinary Vanguard
legal positivism
American legal realism
legal truisms
general theory of law
theory of adjudication
Brian Leiter
author_facet Adam Dyrda
author_sort Adam Dyrda
title Legal Realism and Legal Positivism
title_short Legal Realism and Legal Positivism
title_full Legal Realism and Legal Positivism
title_fullStr Legal Realism and Legal Positivism
title_full_unstemmed Legal Realism and Legal Positivism
title_sort legal realism and legal positivism
publisher Centre for Philosophical Research
series Avant: Journal of Philosophical-Interdisciplinary Vanguard
issn 2082-7598
2082-6710
publishDate 2018-04-01
description American legal realism is commonly treated as a theory-pariah. The article exposes certain reasons explaining such a treatment. Generally, it seems that such an attitude is a result of many misunderstandings of realist aims and ambitions, some of which pertain to the theoretical status of legal realism and its relation to so called general jurisprudential theories, such as legal positivism. In the first part of the article I explain generally what these aims were and how one should see these relations. In the second part I briefly analyze B. Leiter’s famous claim that legal realism is conceptually dependent on hard legal positivism (as a general theory of law). The critique of this claim opens the possibility for some alternative understanding of legal realism.
topic legal positivism
American legal realism
legal truisms
general theory of law
theory of adjudication
Brian Leiter
url http://avant.edu.pl/wp-content/uploads/Dyrda-Realizm-prawniczy.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT adamdyrda legalrealismandlegalpositivism
_version_ 1725917615533064192