Attitudes toward Health Systems Financing in Chile

This article presents an exploratory model to classify public attitudes towards health systems financing and organization. It comprises 5 factors (pay-as-you-use, solidarity, willingness to contribute, mixed financing, and public provision) measured by 17 indicators, selected through Exploratory Str...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pablo A. González PhD, Laura L. Gutiérrez MSc, Juan Carlos Oyanedel PhD, Héctor Sánchez-Rodríguez BSc
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2021-06-01
Series:Inquiry: The Journal of Health Care Organization, Provision, and Financing
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/00469580211020187
id doaj-7b10313fc60a49cab7dda10304b71dc7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7b10313fc60a49cab7dda10304b71dc72021-06-25T02:05:12ZengSAGE PublishingInquiry: The Journal of Health Care Organization, Provision, and Financing0046-95801945-72432021-06-015810.1177/00469580211020187Attitudes toward Health Systems Financing in ChilePablo A. González PhD0Laura L. Gutiérrez MSc1Juan Carlos Oyanedel PhD2Héctor Sánchez-Rodríguez BSc3Universidad de Chile, Santiago, ChileUniversidad de Chile, Santiago, ChileUniversidad Andres Bello, Santiago, ChileUniversidad Andres Bello, Santiago, ChileThis article presents an exploratory model to classify public attitudes towards health systems financing and organization. It comprises 5 factors (pay-as-you-use, solidarity, willingness to contribute, mixed financing, and public provision) measured by 17 indicators, selected through Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling (ESEM) applied to a sample of Chilean adults. Based on this model, cluster analysis proposed 2 groups: “Taxes-public” and “Insurance-choice,” representing 47% and 53% of interviewees, respectively. The results show differences between groups concerning the evaluation of both health care providers and insurers. The second cluster tends to evaluate them more harshly, showing less willingness to contribute further, less solidarity, more agreement with the current financing arrangement in terms of the mixture and its insurance (as opposed to purchasing of service based on health problems), and more support for choice of provider. These results highlight the need to consider people’s attitudes in the public discussion of health systems financing.https://doi.org/10.1177/00469580211020187
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Pablo A. González PhD
Laura L. Gutiérrez MSc
Juan Carlos Oyanedel PhD
Héctor Sánchez-Rodríguez BSc
spellingShingle Pablo A. González PhD
Laura L. Gutiérrez MSc
Juan Carlos Oyanedel PhD
Héctor Sánchez-Rodríguez BSc
Attitudes toward Health Systems Financing in Chile
Inquiry: The Journal of Health Care Organization, Provision, and Financing
author_facet Pablo A. González PhD
Laura L. Gutiérrez MSc
Juan Carlos Oyanedel PhD
Héctor Sánchez-Rodríguez BSc
author_sort Pablo A. González PhD
title Attitudes toward Health Systems Financing in Chile
title_short Attitudes toward Health Systems Financing in Chile
title_full Attitudes toward Health Systems Financing in Chile
title_fullStr Attitudes toward Health Systems Financing in Chile
title_full_unstemmed Attitudes toward Health Systems Financing in Chile
title_sort attitudes toward health systems financing in chile
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Inquiry: The Journal of Health Care Organization, Provision, and Financing
issn 0046-9580
1945-7243
publishDate 2021-06-01
description This article presents an exploratory model to classify public attitudes towards health systems financing and organization. It comprises 5 factors (pay-as-you-use, solidarity, willingness to contribute, mixed financing, and public provision) measured by 17 indicators, selected through Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling (ESEM) applied to a sample of Chilean adults. Based on this model, cluster analysis proposed 2 groups: “Taxes-public” and “Insurance-choice,” representing 47% and 53% of interviewees, respectively. The results show differences between groups concerning the evaluation of both health care providers and insurers. The second cluster tends to evaluate them more harshly, showing less willingness to contribute further, less solidarity, more agreement with the current financing arrangement in terms of the mixture and its insurance (as opposed to purchasing of service based on health problems), and more support for choice of provider. These results highlight the need to consider people’s attitudes in the public discussion of health systems financing.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/00469580211020187
work_keys_str_mv AT pabloagonzalezphd attitudestowardhealthsystemsfinancinginchile
AT lauralgutierrezmsc attitudestowardhealthsystemsfinancinginchile
AT juancarlosoyanedelphd attitudestowardhealthsystemsfinancinginchile
AT hectorsanchezrodriguezbsc attitudestowardhealthsystemsfinancinginchile
_version_ 1721360872053407744