Participation, Representation and Media System: Habermasian Paths to the Past

Drawing from Swedish press history in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, the present article argues for further historical investigation into three aspects of Jürgen Habermas’ theory of the public sphere. The first concerns actual media participation, the second the representative features of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Patrik Lundell
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Linköping University Electronic Press 2010-11-01
Series:Culture Unbound: Journal of Current Cultural Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://cultureunbound.ep.liu.se/article/view/1938
id doaj-7b139c4162a242e497ef26892ded6adf
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7b139c4162a242e497ef26892ded6adf2020-11-25T04:05:26ZengLinköping University Electronic PressCulture Unbound: Journal of Current Cultural Research2000-15252010-11-012410.3384/cu.2000.1525.10226435Participation, Representation and Media System: Habermasian Paths to the PastPatrik Lundell0Department of Communication and Media, Lund University, Sweden Drawing from Swedish press history in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, the present article argues for further historical investigation into three aspects of Jürgen Habermas’ theory of the public sphere. The first concerns actual media participation, the second the representative features of media institutions, and the third media systems. These routes of analysis can and should be combined, and historical specificity is key. When we focus on concrete situations and places, the neat grand-scale chronologies (Habermas’ and others’) fall short. There is no simple development from a “representative publicness” to a participatory public sphere, and back again. And the media have always been interconnected in a system-like way. However, historical specificity does not exclude contemporary developments. The present conclusion is that if we are to gain any true understanding of contemporary phenomena, a historical perspective is crucial, and aspects of Habermas’ theory can serve as heuristic tools. https://cultureunbound.ep.liu.se/article/view/1938Participatory mediarepresentationmedia systempublic sphereJürgen Habermaspress history
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Patrik Lundell
spellingShingle Patrik Lundell
Participation, Representation and Media System: Habermasian Paths to the Past
Culture Unbound: Journal of Current Cultural Research
Participatory media
representation
media system
public sphere
Jürgen Habermas
press history
author_facet Patrik Lundell
author_sort Patrik Lundell
title Participation, Representation and Media System: Habermasian Paths to the Past
title_short Participation, Representation and Media System: Habermasian Paths to the Past
title_full Participation, Representation and Media System: Habermasian Paths to the Past
title_fullStr Participation, Representation and Media System: Habermasian Paths to the Past
title_full_unstemmed Participation, Representation and Media System: Habermasian Paths to the Past
title_sort participation, representation and media system: habermasian paths to the past
publisher Linköping University Electronic Press
series Culture Unbound: Journal of Current Cultural Research
issn 2000-1525
publishDate 2010-11-01
description Drawing from Swedish press history in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, the present article argues for further historical investigation into three aspects of Jürgen Habermas’ theory of the public sphere. The first concerns actual media participation, the second the representative features of media institutions, and the third media systems. These routes of analysis can and should be combined, and historical specificity is key. When we focus on concrete situations and places, the neat grand-scale chronologies (Habermas’ and others’) fall short. There is no simple development from a “representative publicness” to a participatory public sphere, and back again. And the media have always been interconnected in a system-like way. However, historical specificity does not exclude contemporary developments. The present conclusion is that if we are to gain any true understanding of contemporary phenomena, a historical perspective is crucial, and aspects of Habermas’ theory can serve as heuristic tools.
topic Participatory media
representation
media system
public sphere
Jürgen Habermas
press history
url https://cultureunbound.ep.liu.se/article/view/1938
work_keys_str_mv AT patriklundell participationrepresentationandmediasystemhabermasianpathstothepast
_version_ 1724433946655064064