Differences of Anteroposterior Pelvic Radiographs Between Supine Position and Standing Position in Patients with Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip

Objective To explore the difference in pelvic tilt and hip joint parameters with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) comparing the anteroposterior (AP) pelvic radiographs taken in supine and standing positions. Methods A prospective study of DDH patients undergoing Bernese periacetabular osteot...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Guo‐yue Yang, Ya‐yue Li, Dian‐zhong Luo, Cheng Hui, Kai Xiao, Hong Zhang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2019-12-01
Series:Orthopaedic Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/os.12574
id doaj-7b166750693542a1a0948b952e014cb9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7b166750693542a1a0948b952e014cb92020-11-25T01:55:52ZengWileyOrthopaedic Surgery1757-78531757-78612019-12-011161142114810.1111/os.12574Differences of Anteroposterior Pelvic Radiographs Between Supine Position and Standing Position in Patients with Developmental Dysplasia of the HipGuo‐yue Yang0Ya‐yue Li1Dian‐zhong Luo2Cheng Hui3Kai Xiao4Hong Zhang5Department of Orthopaedic Third Central Hospital of Tianjin Tianjin ChinaDepartment of Orthopaedic Third Central Hospital of Tianjin Tianjin ChinaThe Fourth Medical Center of the Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital Department of Orthopaedic Beijing ChinaThe Fourth Medical Center of the Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital Department of Orthopaedic Beijing ChinaThe Fourth Medical Center of the Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital Department of Orthopaedic Beijing ChinaThe Fourth Medical Center of the Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital Department of Orthopaedic Beijing ChinaObjective To explore the difference in pelvic tilt and hip joint parameters with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) comparing the anteroposterior (AP) pelvic radiographs taken in supine and standing positions. Methods A prospective study of DDH patients undergoing Bernese periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) was conducted. AP pelvic radiographs were taken in supine and standing positions before surgery The pelvic tilt and hip joint parameters from the two radiographs were compared. Contrast parameters included the distance between the pubic symphysis to sacrococcygeal distance (PSSC), lateral center‐edge angle (LCEA), Tönnis angle (TA), and angle of sharp (SA). Results A total of 110 young DDH patients were enrolled, including 32 men and 78 women, aged 18–49 years. The male PSSC was 45.63 ± 13.69 mm in supine position and 36.91 ± 12.33 mm in standing position (P < 0.05). The female PSSC was 56.76 ± 13.54 mm in supine position and 48.62 ± 15.44 mm in standing position (P < 0.05). In this study, LCEA <20° in AP pelvic radiographs in the supine position was found in 52 men and 135 women. For male patients, in supine position and standing position, LCEA were 5.51° ± 11.88° and 4.45° ± 12.22°, respectively (P < 0.05); TA were 20.20° ± 9.63° and 21.30° ± 9.97°, respectively (P < 0.05), and SA comparison showed no significant differences. For female patients, in supine position and standing position, LCEA were 3.07° ± 12.07° and 1.69° ± 12.11°, respectively (P < 0.05), TA were 22.62° ± 9.31° and 23.82° ± 9.45°, respectively (P < 0.05), and SA were 48.01° ± 4.68° and 48.49° ± 4.74°, respectively (P < 0.05). Conclusion Compared with the supine position, the young DDH patients have pelvic tilt backward and a decrease in hip coverage in the standing position.https://doi.org/10.1111/os.12574Developmental dysplasia of the hipOsteotomyPelvic tiltRadiographyShooting position
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Guo‐yue Yang
Ya‐yue Li
Dian‐zhong Luo
Cheng Hui
Kai Xiao
Hong Zhang
spellingShingle Guo‐yue Yang
Ya‐yue Li
Dian‐zhong Luo
Cheng Hui
Kai Xiao
Hong Zhang
Differences of Anteroposterior Pelvic Radiographs Between Supine Position and Standing Position in Patients with Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip
Orthopaedic Surgery
Developmental dysplasia of the hip
Osteotomy
Pelvic tilt
Radiography
Shooting position
author_facet Guo‐yue Yang
Ya‐yue Li
Dian‐zhong Luo
Cheng Hui
Kai Xiao
Hong Zhang
author_sort Guo‐yue Yang
title Differences of Anteroposterior Pelvic Radiographs Between Supine Position and Standing Position in Patients with Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip
title_short Differences of Anteroposterior Pelvic Radiographs Between Supine Position and Standing Position in Patients with Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip
title_full Differences of Anteroposterior Pelvic Radiographs Between Supine Position and Standing Position in Patients with Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip
title_fullStr Differences of Anteroposterior Pelvic Radiographs Between Supine Position and Standing Position in Patients with Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip
title_full_unstemmed Differences of Anteroposterior Pelvic Radiographs Between Supine Position and Standing Position in Patients with Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip
title_sort differences of anteroposterior pelvic radiographs between supine position and standing position in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip
publisher Wiley
series Orthopaedic Surgery
issn 1757-7853
1757-7861
publishDate 2019-12-01
description Objective To explore the difference in pelvic tilt and hip joint parameters with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) comparing the anteroposterior (AP) pelvic radiographs taken in supine and standing positions. Methods A prospective study of DDH patients undergoing Bernese periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) was conducted. AP pelvic radiographs were taken in supine and standing positions before surgery The pelvic tilt and hip joint parameters from the two radiographs were compared. Contrast parameters included the distance between the pubic symphysis to sacrococcygeal distance (PSSC), lateral center‐edge angle (LCEA), Tönnis angle (TA), and angle of sharp (SA). Results A total of 110 young DDH patients were enrolled, including 32 men and 78 women, aged 18–49 years. The male PSSC was 45.63 ± 13.69 mm in supine position and 36.91 ± 12.33 mm in standing position (P < 0.05). The female PSSC was 56.76 ± 13.54 mm in supine position and 48.62 ± 15.44 mm in standing position (P < 0.05). In this study, LCEA <20° in AP pelvic radiographs in the supine position was found in 52 men and 135 women. For male patients, in supine position and standing position, LCEA were 5.51° ± 11.88° and 4.45° ± 12.22°, respectively (P < 0.05); TA were 20.20° ± 9.63° and 21.30° ± 9.97°, respectively (P < 0.05), and SA comparison showed no significant differences. For female patients, in supine position and standing position, LCEA were 3.07° ± 12.07° and 1.69° ± 12.11°, respectively (P < 0.05), TA were 22.62° ± 9.31° and 23.82° ± 9.45°, respectively (P < 0.05), and SA were 48.01° ± 4.68° and 48.49° ± 4.74°, respectively (P < 0.05). Conclusion Compared with the supine position, the young DDH patients have pelvic tilt backward and a decrease in hip coverage in the standing position.
topic Developmental dysplasia of the hip
Osteotomy
Pelvic tilt
Radiography
Shooting position
url https://doi.org/10.1111/os.12574
work_keys_str_mv AT guoyueyang differencesofanteroposteriorpelvicradiographsbetweensupinepositionandstandingpositioninpatientswithdevelopmentaldysplasiaofthehip
AT yayueli differencesofanteroposteriorpelvicradiographsbetweensupinepositionandstandingpositioninpatientswithdevelopmentaldysplasiaofthehip
AT dianzhongluo differencesofanteroposteriorpelvicradiographsbetweensupinepositionandstandingpositioninpatientswithdevelopmentaldysplasiaofthehip
AT chenghui differencesofanteroposteriorpelvicradiographsbetweensupinepositionandstandingpositioninpatientswithdevelopmentaldysplasiaofthehip
AT kaixiao differencesofanteroposteriorpelvicradiographsbetweensupinepositionandstandingpositioninpatientswithdevelopmentaldysplasiaofthehip
AT hongzhang differencesofanteroposteriorpelvicradiographsbetweensupinepositionandstandingpositioninpatientswithdevelopmentaldysplasiaofthehip
_version_ 1724982897909170176